Comparing the Operational Characteristics of Plastic 3D Printed Spur Gears

Back to back gear test rig used in performed experimental research.

Spur gears, which can achieve high transmission ratio and energy efficiency, are comment elements used in the transmission of motion and high intensity power for mechanical power drives, i.e. belt drives, chain drives, and cylindrical gear drives. These power transmission elements are exposed to non-conforming operating conditions in terms of load and speed, and are also applicable at high speeds. Spur gears play a big role in mechanical engineering, and are often tested in back to back gear test rigs in order to gain data regarding the gear teeth flanks’ surface load capacity.

A group of researchers from the University of Belgrade in Serbia and the Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava published a paper, titled “The Influence of Material on the Operational Characteristics of Spur Gears Manufactured by the 3D Printing Technology,” on their efforts to test plastic 3D printed spur gears on a back to back gear test rig, in order to increase the use of the technology in manufacturing these gears.

3D printing direction of the 3D printed spur gear.

“In this paper the influence of the material type on the operational characteristics of spur gears manufactured by the 3D printing technology is analyzed, after the experimental testing performed on a back to back gear test rig, in the predefined laboratory conditions,” the researchers wrote.

“For the purposes of this paper, two types of polymeric materials were analyzed. The initial load in the form of a torque that was exposed to the spur gears was held constant, while the number of revolutions per minute of spur gears was varied. The plastic gears tested in this experiment operated in unlubricated working conditions.”

The researchers performed a comparative analysis, using commercially available PLA and ABS materials, on their impact on the 3D printed spur gears’ operating performance. The most common bulk failures in spur gears made of metal are teeth fractures and surface degradation like pitting and scuffing, but the researchers weren’t quite sure if this would be the case for their 3D printed plastic gears.

“With metallic spur gears, the load in the form of torque increases at the appropriate levels while simultaneously controlling the process of surface destruction of the gear teeth flanks,” the researchers explained.

“For the purposes of this experiment, the load in the form of a torque is fixed, that is, the initial moment of constant intensity has value 20 Nm. The torque of this intensity is insufficient to cause premature surface and volume destruction of spur gear teeth. The initially captured torque is “lost” during the wear process. The idea of this experiment was to estimate the wearing intensity for the initially captured load for two different spur gear materials.”

Worn off teeth flank surfaces of the tested PLA gears.

While back to back gear testing typically includes a constant number of revolutions of the electric motor, the frequency regulator was connected to the electric motor for this testing in order to have the ability to change the rotation. The researchers adopted a rotational speed change of 200 rpm, which was changed every ten minutes during the experiment, meaning they reached the maximum 1400 rpm after an hour of testing.

Indicators most commonly used for spur gear operational analysis include temperatures, noise and vibration levels, and the quantity and shape of wear products, and the researchers chose vibration (RMS acceleration) and temperature as the main indicators for their 3D printed ones. A thermal imaging camera was used to record the meshing temperature field of the 3D printed spur gears, while an SKF Microlog Analyzer GX collected information on the vibrations.

“Knowing the number of teeth of the tested spur gears, as well as their number of revolutions, a change in the amplitude of the vibration level is observed over time, by distinguishing the peak resulting from the meshing of the plastic spur gears,” the researchers explained.

In the first five minutes of the experiment under 200 rpm, there was hardly any vibration observed; additionally, in the first ten minutes under 200 rpm, the temperature of the PLA gears was about 20% higher than that of the ABS gears. Eventually, the 3D printed ABS spur gears endured roughly 30 minutes of work before experiencing failure in their teeth at 600 rpm, while the 3D printed PLA spur gears lasted for 90 minutes at 1400 rpm with no visible fractures, but showing “evident teeth contact surface destruction.”

Failure at the teeth roots of the tested ABS gears.

“In the interval from 5 to 15 minutes, vibrations behaviour of ABS and PLA plastic gear pairs is inverse comparing to their thermal behaviour,” the researchers wrote. “The vibrations of ABS plastic gears is higher (RMS=0,18 ms-2) than the ones made of PLA plastic (RMS=0,06 ms-2). Increasing the rotational speed from 300 up the 400 rpm, the vibration of both gear pairs significantly rises (up to RMS=0,72 ms-2). After 400 to 500 and 600 rpm, the vibration levels are declining. After 30 minutes of testing with 600 rpm, just before tooth of ABS gear pair fractured, the level of RMS accelerations was 0,3 ms-2. The vibration level of PLA plastic gear pair vary with an increase of rpm and oscillate around 0,25 ms-2. At the end of experiment (on 1400 rpm) the vibration values of PLA plastic gear pair is increasing to 0,5 ms-2, probably due to gear tooth contact surface destruction.”

Based on their findings, the researchers were able to conclude that the 3D printed PLA spur gears had better operational characteristics than the ABS ones.

Co-authors of the paper are Aleksandar Dimić, Žarko Mišković, Radivoje Mitrović, Mileta Ristivojević, Zoran Stamenić, Ján Danko, Jozef Bucha, and Tomáš Milesich.

Discuss this research and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below.

Researchers Complete Comprehensive Evaluation of Manufacturing Methods, Including 3D Printing, for Impellers

EDM and ECM finishing of near-net-shape turbo charger wheels produced by additive manufacturing and investment casting.

Combustion engines uses turbochargers to boost their performance. But, for multiple reasons, there isn’t a conventional process chain for economically manufacturing the component. A team of researchers from RWTH Aachen University and Robert Bosch GmbH recognized the need for a comprehensive evaluation of alternative manufacturing methods for impellers – 3D printing isn’t the only way – and set out to deliver. They published their results in a paper, titled “Technological and Economical Assessment of Alternative Process Chains for Turbocharger Impeller Manufacture.”

The abstract reads, “In this paper, different manufacturing chains consisting of pre-finishing and finishing of near-net-shape parts are compared to each other for a given example geometry. Electrochemical as well as Electrical Discharge Machining technologies are taken into account as alternatives for conventional milling and grinding processes for the finishing of cast blanks or samples produced by additive manufacturing. Based on a technological analysis a cost comparison is executed, which allows an economical assessment of the different process chains regarding given boundary conditions and varying production quantities.”

In addition to electrochemical (ECM) and electrical discharge machining (EDM) technologies, the team also looked at wire-based technology variants (WEDM/WECM) for outer straight geometries, and 3D-(Sinking)-based technologies for inner flow ones. They completed a cost comparison of the methods, based on technological analysis, which, as the researchers wrote, “allows an economical assessment of the different process chains regarding boundary conditions and production quantities.”

Turbocharger wheels – blank manufacturing by investment casting (near-net-shape and finish contour) or additive manufacturing and conventional finishing by milling and grinding

“In a first step a technological process analysis took place for both alternative primary shaping processes of turbocharger wheel blanks and for finish machining of near-net-shape geometries by conventional as well as unconventional advanced machining processes,” the researchers wrote. “Target values were a geometrical precision better than 0.05 mm and a minimum surface roughness of Rz = 4 µm.”

Fine investment casting can be used to manufacture a blank with defined material allowance, as well as electron beam melting (EBM) 3D printing, though the latter with require post processing because of insufficient geometrical precision and a rough surface. It’s possible to finish with 5-axis milling, but due to extensive tool wear, it will require a lot of effort. The team determined that abrasive flow machining and vibratory grinding would not work.

“All technological necessary efforts have been evaluated and aggregated in a production cost ratio relative to the standard investment casting process as basis,” the team wrote in the paper. “This includes tool costs (purchase costs and life time), raw material costs (melt / powder material), energy (average energy consumption) and working costs (salary and multiple machine work) as well as machine costs (investment, net book value, space, maintenance, machining time per part) for main and secondary process like hot isostatic pressing (HIP) – imperative for the EBM parts – and washing. Additional industrial boundary conditions were a yearly lot size of 150,000 parts and working time of 4,800 h. The earnings per worker amounts to 43.75 €/h, the energy price and monthly space costs are 0.128 €/kWh and 12 €/m² respectively. The imputed interest rate is 10 %.”

Production costs of different primary shaping and finish machining as well as handling processes relative to the investment casting process.

Alternative EDM- and ECM-based processes were also included in the diagram.

The researchers explained that the microstructures from 3D printing and casting processes had a major influence on the final surface roughness. In addition, the ECM-processed material was analyzed, and basic EDM research showed that for the TiAl material, the correct electrical polarity had to be clarified. By applying a new flushing concept based on WECM, the team was able to achieve higher ECM cutting rates in a “competitive order of magnitude of 20 mm²/min also for macroscopic workpiece heights.”

EDM and ECM applications for finishing turbo charger wheels.

It was determined that, under the boundary conditions laid down, 3D-EDM is not a competitive  or efficient single process, but 3D-ECM is, when compared to 5-axis milling. Additionally, WEDM and WECM showed low costs.

“It can be concluded that the process chains involving 3DEDM are not suitable as their cost ratios are higher than 300 % of the reference but the ECM variants reveal significant advantages due to much lower cost ratios. In addition for the basis costs, the AM produced raw blanks reveal lower cost ratios compared to the investment casted ones – even for the given series production,” the researchers wrote.

These results are due to the specific material properties of the TiAl material. Because of low costs for the outer geometry finishing, the contour casted samples also had higher cost ratios.

“As a conclusion – for the given boundary conditions – the process chain including 3DECM and WECM of AM produced blank wheels achieved the lowest costs and was therefore the most efficient one,” the researchers wrote. “Further work should include detailed studies on surface integrity for the different machining processes and appropriate positioning.”

Co-authors of the paper are A. Klink, M. Hlavac, T. Herrig, and M. Holsten.