Interview with BigRep CEO Stephan Beyer

Hot off of their announcement to partner with Bosh Rexroth we interviewed CEO Dr. Stephan Beyer of BigRep GmbH. The large format company seems to be excelling in partnerships and marketing. What is happening with the Berlin-based startup and where are they headed?

How is BigRep doing?

“We are seeing a very dynamic business right now, with BigRep and its partners leading the way in one of the 21 st century’s most exciting, disruptive technologies: 3D printing is already re-shaping Additive Manufacturing now in many industries. We are building the world’s largest serial production 3D printers, so we are experiencing a high level of interest and requests from industrial companies from around the world.”

What are your target verticals and types of companies?

“We are serving many different company types and industries, among them, of course, aviation, automotive, rail, design and architecture. We have a great many small- to mid-sized companies among our clients, but also major corporations. This reflects our highly flexible, customer-oriented approach. You need to listen to the industry. So we first identify and analyze the required application, which, in turn, drives the selection of performance materials, leading to the third and final step, the system as such, industrial AM equipment based on a 3D large-format printer.”

Why should I buy a BigRep?

“The top five reasons are these:

  • Size – with a capacity of over one cubic meter, the BigRep ONE provides the largest FFFbuilt volume currently available in the market.

  • “Made in Germany” – only our printers are based on the know-how of high-standard Germanengineering.

  • Technical quality – Our machines guarantee reliable, precise manufacturing with the highestlevel of iteration quality.

  • An open-choice approach for filaments.

  • Costs – BigRep printers are highly cost-efficient, both in acquisition costs and in long-term operations.”

How big is BigRep?

“We are headquartered in Berlin with a team of 90 engineers, developers, designers and experts from 22 different nations. As we are serving clients around the world, we also have offices in Boston and Singapore. In addition, we rely on an excellent global network of partners and re-sellers. We also have a global network of leading industry partners, such as Etihad Airways and Deutsche Bahn, as well as key investors – including BASF, Koehler, Klöckner and Körber.”

Are you aiming to make many small things quickly or large items?

“Actually both. One of the advantages of large-scale printers, of course, is to create large industrial objects in one single piece. But speed is of essence, too. So a fast extruder is quite important. For the ONE, we offer an optional Power Extruder with 0.6, 1 and 2 mm nozzles that can print 60% quicker, thus making our printer one of the fastest large-format 3D printers in the market.”

Will your machines grow bigger still?

“Well, they might depend on customer requirements. But more important is to make them faster and even more efficient – and more connected.”

You received EU funding, what did you use it for?

“The EU funding aims at supporting the growth of BigRep.”

What are the challenges when developing a 3D printer?

“Today, as any 3D printers, the large-format machines also will have to become faster and more efficient. They also need to offer interconnectivity and data in order to become a key element in smart factories and IoT applications. These are the challenges any manufacturer faces right now.

Where do you hope to see BigRep in five years?  What is BigRep’s ambition?
For us, it has always been about moving this technology and this industry forward. Studies show that the 3D printer market will grow by 20 per cent annually until 2020. A study by McKinsey forecasts a market volume of 100-250 billion Euros by then – and one of the driving forces behind this will be large-format 3D printing.

Given this background, we are aiming at taking a leading role in the 3D printing market for industrial manufacturing. Equally, we are aiming at further expanding the business while, at the same time, becoming the innovation and thought leader in the 3D printing industry.”

Do you see yourself as being a part of an ecosystem or developing a platform or just shipping a machine?

“We follow a comprehensive, sustained approach, so we develop complete solutions for integrated additive manufacturing systems, as well as a wide range of printing materials on an open-choice basis.”

What kind of industries do you think will use 3D printing for manufacturing in the near future?

“The same as today – automotive, aviation and transportation such as rail. In addition, medical technology, consumer goods, research and science are other promising areas of applications.”

Is sand casting important to you?

“It is a fascinating application. 3D models created by engineers with the use of a CAD software only need to be transferred to a BigRep 3D printer to be produced. It shortens the production cycle, reduces the use of resources and makes the complete process more cost and time-efficient. One example for this is the UK-based company Teignbridge Propellers International, which produces propellers for tugs, luxury yachts, fishing trawlers and ferries. Here, the BigRep ONE 3D printer is used to 3D print a full-size replica of the designed propeller to be the positive pattern for the cast mold, making the process faster by 33 per cent.”

Interview with Fabian Alefeld of Additive Minds, 3D Printing Training, Consulting and Application Development

One of the things holding 3D printing back is the lack of Application Development Consultants. Imagine the dawn of the asphalt age, bitumen production increases as maps are filled with squiggly lines where fields once stood. Cars roll off of vastly expanded production lines while workers who built them on cue, queue in lines for new automobiles. Where do we see the constraints of this automotive revolution? We don’t really see them at the time, just like we can’t fathom the effects. Decades on suburbs emerge, nations have changed and the citizens of the first world are all connected by a web of white lines on hardened petroleum, a new future being patrolled by cars propelled of earth’s crust cured dinosaur. We are, I believe, at the forefront of just such a revolution. But, rather than connecting all the points of the known world we will connect all the points of our imaginations with the makable.

All our dreams unmade will become things. We have machines and materials being pushed by millions in investment. New 3D printers, 3D printing technologies, and applications emerge daily. Many companies are trying to use 3D printing for manufacturing and are exploring many uses of the technology in the supply chain. But, what apart from institutional decay and inefficiency is holding them back? If we go back to our automobile example, and truly by now as allegories go if it were a horse and carriage the horse would have long been whipped to death, what is lacking is driving instructors. We can build the machines and making the materials is ramping up, we have designers that are learning and companies that are exploring. Excited business development folks have filled their powerpoints with more hockey sticks than the NHL. Everyone who dares think knows that 3D printing will change a lot of things in many industries. The hype may have subsided but now the wave of adoption is being pushed behind closed doors. Sadly these companies know that the road to the future is there but maybe don’t know that they can’t drive. This is especially the case with those being ‘helped’ by consultants that perhaps are good at consulting but have no industry knowledge to speak of let alone practical experience with commercializing our technologies. A comedy of Excel, these limited Value chain morons embarrass themselves to no end.  My favorite thing applied to those that perhaps should stick to hugging clouds or helping your local government with its blockchain challenges in, “they don’t even know how to ask the right questions.” Imagine asking an abstract expressionist used to dripping paint everywhichway to make a subway sign legible to thousands. The bull excrement artists are indeed artists but we need those that can actually teach and explain, not mystify. Meanwhile, I think I’ll place my trust in a sign maker who is paid to make something that points people to the right way rather than a tech term maker who is paid to play buzzword bingo.

Image: Tobias Hase. A portion of the Additive Minds team in Krailling near Munchen. Fabian is the one in the charcoal suit.

Happily, there are a few consultants in our corner who do actually know what they’re talking about. These people are called Additive Minds (there are a few others as well). Additive Minds is an academy, a series of demo locations and consulting services geared toward letting customers industrialize 3D printing for manufacturing. Born from laser powder bed fusion giant EOS these consultants are helping companies go from a standstill towards driving towards the future. We spoke to Fabian Alefeld of Additive Minds to find out more.

What is Additive Minds? 

Additive Minds is an applied engineering and consulting group in the field of industrial 3D-Printing. We support organizations in various industries to transform themselves to enter production with additive manufacturing (AM). Our team consists of more than 100 experts globally, that guide companies through their individual AM transformation and transfer the necessary knowledge organizations need to become successful. To date, we’ve performed more than 300 projects globally, all with the objective of growing the AM market and creating trust in industrial 3D Printing.”

What do you do?

“As the manager for the consulting business of Additive Minds, I oversee all consulting activities within the North American market. This focuses on identifying challenges and opportunities AM creates for organizations and translating those into long-term projects. Currently, I am building a team in the US that, jointly with customers, identifies value chain opportunities and applications with a technical and economic feasibility to be produced using AM. We then work with our engineering teams of Additive Minds to develop those organizations into successful AM production chains for innovative applications.”

Give me an example of a project? 

Laser Powder Bed Fusion Spare parts for Daimler Evobus, notice the textures and surface finish.

“With Daimler Evobus, Additive Minds proved that manufacturing spare parts additively can create a positive business case for OEMs by simplifying the spare part supply chain. Here, Daimler and Additive Minds screened a portfolio of more than 300,000 parts and identified 2,000 metal and polymer parts that could be produced additively. In the current first production stage, Daimler is 3D printing 20 of those with EOS technology. Within such projects, we are keen to transfer as much knowledge as possible – this means, that the next part screening and application development phases within Daimler can happen without the support of Additive Minds.

Other projects include setting up centers of excellence within organizations to establish sustainable AM practices or extensive application development for metal and polymer applications and taking those into validated production.”

Is this application development? 

“Application development is a core expertise of Additive Minds, and our work with Daimler Evobus is one example of this. When it comes to establishing production standards for AM, process parameter development is often underestimated, even though AM can significantly reduce production cost or optimize part properties such as surface finish and density. Out of our 100 experts, one of our teams alone has more than 100 years of experience in AM – consisting of only five people. With experts like that, we can provide organizations with the expertise they need to establish a clear path forward and stay ahead of their competition.”

What’s the best way to take a company from knowing nothing about 3D printing to being able to use it for manufacturing?

Image: Tobias Hase

“This transformation usually starts with identifying potential disruptive levers within their own value chain. From there, we identify applications or potential new solutions where AM adds value by either improving the part performance or the supply chain in addition to having economic feasibility. This all counts towards achieving competitive advantage for our customers and taking them from the initial step into a highly efficient production of innovative parts within the shortest time possible.”

What are some of the key institutional barriers to adopting 3D printing for manufacturing?

“Within organizations, there’s still an experience gap that exists with AM technology and not fully understanding how to best implement AM into current operations.  Comments like “we tried this a few years ago and it didn’t work – AM is not ready” are often said. We work to overcome these mindsets by developing first concepts and a business case to show that the technology has matured from an engineering point of view and has become more economical to convince the purchasing department.

On the other hand, organizations need to invest in key knowledge holders and make sure that they can spread and transfer that knowledge internally. In some projects, we are even certifying internal personal through an Additive Minds led training program that includes workshops and e-learning modules.”

What is tricky if I want to do manufacturing with AM?

“The challenge in implementing AM is educating people so they can think in a new way about manufacturing and then transforming production processes.

Educating people sets the basis, allowing them to think differently and removing barriers in their way of thinking to completely reimagining manufacturing.

On the other hand, the transformation of production means understanding how to incorporate AM into existing production workflows as well as incorporating AM into existing quality systems.”

Image: Tobias Hase

What are product categories and industries that are ripe for AM adoption?

“Almost every industry has an AM pioneer or at the very least, is working on AM applications. The aerospace, medical and tooling industry are already at a quite ripe state and other industries such as automotive are using AM for high performance parts or simplifying their supply chain. Nevertheless, we are at the beginning of transforming manufacturing, as AM currently owns 0.02 percent of the global manufacturing market with a global revenue of $2.5 billion USD.”

Manual labor is still a considerable component of 3D printed parts, how can we reduce this?

“Manual labor will be reduced through automated unpacking and post-processing as well as a seamless digital integration. We are currently working on such solutions with our partners Premium Aerotech and Daimler through our NextGenAM project. Nevertheless, organizations need to distance themselves from looking at AM from a cost-per-part point of view. Rather, organizations need to look at their whole value chain and identify the great opportunities than AM can add. This will justify manual labor of the application and can reduce supply chain complexity or create a competitive advantage.”

I keep thinking that each and every technology will have its own ideal part and application. Do you agree? 

“AM will never be the only technology and disrupt 100% of the traditional manufacturing. Within the AM market, there will also not be only one technology. All players within the AM market are currently jointly working on growing the market, securing trust in this technology. And each different AM technology will have its fields of applications.”

Do you think that SLS (powder bed fusion) will be mainly a technology for medical applications or be used more broadly in manufacturing?

“DMLS and SLS will are already out of the medical niche and used in aerospace, automotive and other industries.”

How long would it take a company to adopt metal printing from knowing nothing to making their first parts?

“We need to distinguish between making first parts versus serial production in a restricted industry.

For making parts, we have educational programs that allow manufacturers to build their first parts independently on EOS standard process parameters within two weeks.

If we are talking about for example an aerospace company that wants to newly develop parts, take them through certification and get into production with a statistical process control and a quality system in place, it can take about 12 to 18 months with external support such as Additive Minds. Without external expertise, this is a risky project, as organizations then need to go through a trial and error phase, which is both time and cost intensive. This is because it is hard for organizations to acquire resources with AM expertise, which are rare and expensive. Companies faced with the option to train existing or new hires and ramping up their learning curve as fast as possible.”

How do you train people?

“Since we founded Additive Minds, which was roughly 4 years ago and originally called AM Consulting, we have developed several methodologies on how to transfer knowledge. However, trainings are only the beginning of implementing AM into organizations. We focus on long-term engagements within projects, where we start with trainings and applied workshops and then transition into a co-engineering and co-creation phase. Through this process, Additive Minds takes over a larger role in the beginning, and step by step transfers the lead to the employees of our customers. That way, knowledge is transferred first and then applied and customized to each and every employee and organization. This is how we secure long-term success for our customers, not long-term dependency on Additive Minds.”

Who are your trainings for?

“Additive Minds focuses on organizational AM transformations, where we provide trainings, workshops and customer specific engineering and consulting services. The goal is to engage new business models in new markets with completely new engineering approaches, enhanced quality management and even digital integration. We need to work with and focus on stakeholders across organizations. From C-Level, purchasing and engineering, to finance and machine operators, all need to be “Additive Minded” to transform such projects into a long-term success.”

Interview with Martin Bondéus of Bondtech

If we look at a FDM (FFF, Material Extrusion) 3D printer the three key components are the feeder, extruder and nozzle of the 3D printer. These components determine the rate and pressure at which the material is deposited as well as (together with fans) how quickly this material solidifies. There are hundreds of 3D printer companies making the boxes that print but precious few companies working on improving the key components of 3D printers. It would be kind of like we were doing a biathlon where hundreds worked tirelessly on the skiing portion of the race but no one was learning how to shoot. One of the very few companies working on improving the key components of 3D printers is Bondtech. Known for its QR extruder and first getting noticed for its V2 extruder the company makes high-quality components that can improve your 3D printer. Better looking parts, faster printing and less failed prints are just some of the possible benefits. My favorite component of Bondtech’s is their drivegear for their feeding system. An incredibly well-designed part it prevents digging and slipping due to incorrectly dimensioned, tensioned or smooth filament. We interviewed the founder of Bondtech, Martin Bondéus, to find out more.

The drivegear seems like such a tiny part but it really has extensive effects in 3D printing. What kinds of effects are they?

“Our feeding system makes a big difference in terms of reliability, our system provides very high feeding force without any slipping or grinding of the filament that will make the process more stable, the operator does not have to worry that an overnight printjob does not finish due to problem with the material feeding.”

How did you make a better drive gear?

“After extensive testing with different solutions in our machine shop with manual machines we were able to define an optimized geometry, after the design was finalized we have moved over to volume production in best in class CNC machining centres.”

What are the effects of this for the user?

“The user can focus on being creative printing new exciting designs instead of worry about if the print job will fail or not.”

What do your QR kits do?

“Our QR kits is our high-end extruder that is virtually indestructible, it is currently our strongest feeder and is available for both 1.75 and 2.85 mm filament in right and left-hand versions to make installations easier, it is the obvious choice if you are looking for the best of Bowden extruders.”

How do they work?

“Featuring two counter-rotating drive gears, the Bondtech extruder grips the filament from both sides, thus eliminating the risk for grinding, slipping, filament deformation and under extrusion. In addition, the extruder is powered by a strong stepper motor and planetary gearbox that provide a superior pushing force.”

Whats a pancake stepper?

“A pancake stepper motor is a shorter version of a normal stepper motor, as these motors have less torque than normal Nema17 motors they require a gearbox inside the extruder in order to provide enough pushing force. The big advantage is that they are lighter than normal Nema17 stepper motors so the moving weight of the printhead is reduced and this makes it possible to print faster with sustained quality. The gearbox also improves the resolution of the extrusion and this is especially important when printing will smaller nozzles.”

What is dual drive and how does it work?

“The DualDrive technology features two counter-rotating drive gears, the Bondtech extruder grips the filament from both sides, thus eliminating the risk for grinding, slipping, filament deformation and under extrusion.”

Why don’t you make hotends?

“Currently, we are focusing in extruders and the parts around this but for the future, we will probably expand our range of products used in the additive manufacturing area.”

Interview with Alessandro Severini of the Felfil Filament Extrusion Machine to Make Your Own Filament at Home

The main thing that attracted me to 3D printing initially was this technology’s promise to let anyone make anything. On top of that once we’re bored with it we could then recycle it and make new things. With 3D printing, we could in a sustainable way have our cake and eat it too. We could grind up and extrude new filament made of old 3D prints or old PET bottles. At the same time this would make 3D printing energy efficient and very low cost. Many companies and projects have tried to make low cost, open source, and easy filament extruders. Most of these extruders are the kind of things that would take pleasure at burning your house down. Rickety, dangerous and difficult to use they’ve been nice representations of the idea but I shudder at the thought of using them again. Some are exceptions such as the high-end 3Devo device which is fine for your lab but too expensive for many of us. There really isn’t a product between the 3Devo and the rickety cheap extruders. The Felfill purports to be just such a device combining ease of use and desktop filament making inside of a relatively inexpensive device. An assembled Felfill costs 719 euros and promises to make a filament manufacturer out of you. We spoke to Alessandro Severini of Felfill to find out more.

What is FelFil?

“Felfil is a 3d printer plastic extruder machine which allows anyone to make custom 3D printing filaments at home, starting from industrial pellet or chopping up wrong 3D prints, old models and plastic waste.

Using our desktop filament maker you will be able to choose your filament color, diameter and material, day by day, according to your creativity and your curiosity. In this way you can save over 80% of the price of filaments spools and help to protect the environment.”

What kinds of customers do you have? 

“Our customers are many and really different from each other. However we can divide it in three different groups: those who are focused on recycling,  those who are focused on research on new material types, such as medical applications, and those who just print a lot and want to save some money buying pellets instead of filament. We are seeking all of them in order to help them to reach their goals.”

What kind of materials can the Felfill make? 

“We have tested the Felfil Evo with a wide range of materials, at the moment we can say that It can successfully process: PLA, ABS, HIPS, TPU, PA12, LDPE and HDPE, PETG, PP, PC/ABS, PCL and PMMA, and this list is in continuously updated.”

If I process HIPS and ABS won’t harmful fumes come from this?

“Ye,s It could happen. For this reason we strongly suggest our customers take every possible precaution about their own safety such as using it in a well ventilated area and under a fume hood.”

How well are you doing as a company?

“Never good enough! We are working hard in order to increase our business an improve our products quality, we are also developing some new interesting things and we will show them in next few months.”

Mainstreaming of Additive Manufacturing: An Ecosystem Perspective

This week’s busy and informative Science in the Age of Experience event, held in Boston, highlighted the 3DEXPERIENCE of organizer Dassault Systèmes‘ partners and customers as 3D technologies make more integrated platform thinking possible. Starting off the event, co-located with the 3DEXPERIENCE Forum, was Monday’s Additive Manufacturing Symposium, which brought together experts across a variety of disciplines and focuses working with industrial 3D printing technologies.

Subham Sett, Director, Additive Manufacturing & Materials, was one of the driving forces behind the Symposium experience as he was for last year’s, and it was a pleasure to speak with him again as we sat down to discuss the merits of such gatherings as well as the direction of the industry.

“When we started planning for the event, last year we looked at everything from conceiving the product to making it. We had a vision for material, design, manufacturing, and marketplace, but we weren’t in a place to say everything is out there to see, or it wasn’t widespread. A year later, we’re there,” he told me of the coming together of this resource and the progress made in just one year in the industry.

“We can see that in the tracks; there’s a growing ecosystem, and users, with thought leaders willing to come and speak of their own experiences. We heard from Airbus and the journey they started in this direction. A nice thing from the Airbus keynote was to see everything start with design on the project [Sjoerd Van der Veen] was talking about, which was under way I want to say two years ago. At our users’ conference in 2015, Airbus challenged us to see what Dassault can do end to end… It’s been great to see not onlyt that, but to hear from Boeing too. These challenges from the biggest names in aerospace, and how we talk about going from concept to production.”

Subham Sett, far right, kept the 3D printing panel conversation going as the moderator

Given the breadth of industries putting Dassault Systèmes’ portfolio of services to use, taking ideas through to production requires a strong look at design. By incorporating 3D printing more significantly into the workflow, design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) figures more strongly into consideration, particularly when looking toward the rising need for functional parts.

“Design is the first step, looking at lightweighting, at topology optimization. For the industry to grow and become mainstream, these parts have to be in production in the field. Our focus is printable,” Sett said.

“What’s really driving this shift toward performance in additive is material. Additive is science; we’re bringing in the physics to make it functional.”

The sessions, including the breakout tracks, were designed to bring a variety of perspectives to showcase the importance of these sciences in industrial 3D printing. Sett underscored that Dassault Systèmes is focusing on developing simulation from a material perspective and a process perspective, in a material- and process-agnostic way. It is, as he calls it, any material, any machine. This approach allows users to meet their needs without needing to turn to new software packages; “All of it can be done by a very simple customization process,” Sett noted.

By leveraging experience gained across platforms such as CATIA over the last two decades-plus, the Dassault Systèmes team has been developing their additive manufacturing applications by “using the same digital thread, parametric geometry,” and having been exposed to users’ applications ranging from functional design to shape compensation. Compensating for distortion ahead of a print job allows for the part to come out right the first time, thanks to simulation.

“We are at a point in additive manufactuing where it’s still not mainstream, and there’s a lot to figure out. Technologies are changing at such a rapid pace it almost feels like the latest and greatest for technology is in the additive space. There is not enough being done yet to address how the end user approaches it, though. I feel that’s a shared responsibility for the ecosystem, whether software like us or OEMs, to come together to design programs, whether graduate or undergraduate level programs, to train more,” Sett said, pointing to the critical consideration of workforce education and training.

“With Dassault Systèmes we’ve started the journey already; you can see that in the [co-located student] hackathon, they have access to our whole software suite, working in one environment through the cloud. They can be productive, they can communicate with the machine. This is a bridge between the digital world and the real world. More needs to be done at the curriculum level, and we’re talking with several universities to add to the curriculum. A lot more needs to be done.”

Keeping on this train of thought, we touched on the need for training and certification in the industry as well. The current workforce requires more training to be ready to bring these new technologies on-site — and they need the reassurance that it will be worth it. Certification of parts for end use is a major focus in particularly the highly-regulated aerospace and medical sectors, and will have a cumulative effect of highlighting the quality and consistency with which additive manufacturing can produce parts for industry.

“Where we are seeing a lot of interest for functional parts is in aerospace and defense, but also in life sciences. Not just for customized tools, either; this is an area users and cusotmers are encouraging us to push. Life sciences are seeing more focus in materials qualification and process certification. These industries are leading the charge for usable parts. Hopefully others will follow suit,” he said.

For additive manufacturing to truly become mainstream, Sett pointed out, functional parts need to come into existence.

“Part of that picture is getting the whole supply chain on a certification track. It’s a shared responsibility to move the industry along,” he said.

[Image: Dassault Systèmes]

Part of that shared responsibility also means building up a better experience for users. One challenge many potential users are facing, and one directly impacting Dassault Systèmes, comes in the form of software. Some users have reported as many as 10 different software programs coming into play. “Engineers, designers, simulation analysts, and manufacturers are not just looking at software that looks integrated on the surface,” Sett pointed out, but require actual integration in real-world conditions.

“There’s are productivity loss issues that come with learning multiple software packages. Clearly there’s recognition of this in the additive manufacturing industry as it’s maturing. Being able to connect all this in a digital thread that takes it all the way through machines is necessary,” he said. “There’s a need for hardware and software guys to come together to complete the user experience — not just the user experience, but the whole journey… From the Dassault Systèmes side, we want to bridge that gap from concept to production so we can focus more on production.”

Ultimately, he told me, the message he’s looking to get out there is that, “We want to make additive real for the enterprise.”

An entire ecosystem is necessary for industrial 3D printing to truly take its place as part of the mainstream manufacturing industry, with all aspects connecting much more seamlessly than they are now.

Discuss Dassault Systèmes, industry challenges, and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts in the Facebook comments below.

[All photos: Sarah Goehrke]

 

3D Scanning, 3D Printing, and the Business of Publishing Shoes

A volunteer prepares to demonstrate the 3D scanning process for FitStation at the HP Global Innovation Summit

In today’s virtual world, stepping outside to take a breather and immerse oneself in nature is often a much-needed break from computers and the fluorescent lights of an office. That sort of immersion is enhanced for many people by taking a walk — and, increasingly, doing so while wearing footwear created with advanced technologies including immersive computing.

During the HP Global Innovation Summit earlier this month in Barcelona, after having heard more from HP and its partners working with the FitStation platform announced last summer, I appreciated the opportunity to sit down with Josh St. John, Head of Product, Immersive Computing at HP, and Eric Hayes, Chief Marketing Officer, Superfeet to hear more about progress in personalized footwear.

“We’ve seen progress made on 3D printing for lasts and molds,” Hayes told me, touching as well on the Flowbuilt facility announced shortly before our conversation. “That’s the catcher of the information that turns information from digital to physical. We have Multi Jet Fusion there and more; the intent of Flowbuilt is to make the products that FitStation uses. We use MJF for 3D printing of lasts, there’s the ability to adapt the shape of the shoe or insole to your foot.

“The magic of FitStation, where all the effort from Josh’s team and all comes in, is to take that data and make it into something that’s actually good for your body. If you take that static image and create a thing from it, it’s not helping your body; we wash it, we craft it into the shape your body needs to best benefit from it. Then we build a last and build a shoe around its shape for your body. The reason the wood-carved lasts went by the wayside is that they were expensive, they were used once and put by the wayside. There are a lof of people now; we can’t all have our own wood lasts in the back. With MJF, we print not only the lasts, but the unique parts. We print individual areas, apply that to traditional lasts, and can build the shoe around that.”

Hayes (left) and St. John

The FitStation work includes collaboration with DESMA, which Hayes noted requires molds made to go on their particular machines. As with effectively any mold, there are traditionally long lead times and high costs involved in creating molds via specialized mold makers. 3D printing allows for increasingly well-understood benefits in streamlining this process, reducing costs and times.

“MJF moves an $8,000 mold to maybe a $1,500 one. For the future, there’s potential use in development and then production. Compare that with a mold made from aluminum,” Hayes said. “With molding able to move from development to production, there’s potential for profit for outside shoe sizes for a company, for smaller brands that can expand to in-between sizes.”

The pain of having a nonstandard shoe size frequently extends beyond shoe store frustration, as finding a good fit often translates to a good-enough fit — which for those spending significant time on their feet is often not good enough at all. Line and service workers, hikers, runners, or anyone else relying on pedestrian mobility face a tough issue in seeking out the perfect shoes and insoles to keep them as comfortable as possible.

Shoes, St. John affirmed, should be optimized for fit.

“FitStation lets us quantify that, lets us create instructions for manufacturing. Brooks is developing a shoe, produced across the FitStation platform, that all comes down to optimizing the manufacturing infrastructure for it,” he said, touching on the personalized Genesys shoe that Brooks unveiled at the summit.

The partners involved in FitStation create a recommendation process to determine the best route to best fit. This process, Hayes added, offers a helpful approach for customers.

“The onus is entirely on the consumer right now to find what fits for them,” he told me. “FitStation takes that over, cuts the wheat from the chaff if you will, and provides a service, which is very important for the consumer. Designs are curated for the consumer. Curation and customization is the next step up.”

Operating at 29 retail pilot sites as of the time of our chat, St. John pointed to the offerings of FitStation when it comes to 3D scanning feet. Incorporating MJF 3D printing into the end-to-end FitStation platform, HP sees “an opportunity to scale the 3D printed insole business,” he said, as 3D printing custom insoles and orthotics enables a better, more personal fit.

This advanced solution in a platform approach enables not only a better ultimate fit and experience for the consumer, but a new way of thinking for footwear providers.

“Superfeet is 41 years old; we’ve launched a lot of products over the years,” Hayes said. “The ME3D product coming off Multi Jet Fusion has been the most successful product launch in Superfeet history; it has the lowest return rate, the highest rating, and the highest repeat purchase rate. The average Superfeet consumer owns three insoles, which tend to be disparate, think for casual, formal, and hiking shoes. Once they find ME3D, they want more ME3D, which is fantastic. The product itself just performs so much better, because we’re making it specific not just to you, but to your right foot and your left foot. Being able to customize this pair and tailor one for your left foot and one for your right foot, the overall satisfaction rating goes through the roof.”

Very few people are actually symmetrical, and it’s these small variations that give us personality — and can make finding the right fit additionally challenging. This is where 3D printing fits especially well, as the technology is seeing increasing use among a growing amount of businesses involved in the footwear sector.

“With all the applications we’re aware of, in dental, in jewelry, this is the application I’ve seen that’s ripest for it,” St. John said of footwear.

The coming together of footwear and 3D printing is attracting notice worldwide. Advances in the technological capabilities of additive manufacturing are seeing it situated as a strong contender for footwear applications, as materials are strong enough now to support weight in end-use products alongside the use of the technology to create lasts and molds for more traditional fabrication. Integration with advanced platforms incorporating 3D scanning and software support also make more possible.

“It’s not that we’ve been ignoring 3D printing for the last 25 years, it’s that 3D printing wasn’t ready yet to put the Superfeet name on it,” Hayes said of the company’s relationship with the technology.

“The data coming off Fitstation wasn’t there. MJF made it not just economical, but viable performance-wise for us to put our name on it. We’re very confident because of MJF and what the performance can do. Anyone can take a scan of a foot; it’s what you do with that data that matters. FitStation lets us manufacture off that data, and lets us do it at scale, turn it around, and deliver to the customer.”

Scale production and enabling new economies of manufacturing are among the key issues HP has sought to address with its Multi Jet Fusion 3D printing technology. That realizable benefits of these efforts are being acknowledged and put to use in real-world production is a strong statement to the viability of HP’s ambitious disruptive vision for industrial 3D manufacturing.

The 3D printed heelcap of a Superfeet insole

These visions are being brought to fruition not by MJF alone, of course, but through the integration of complementary technologies, including immersive computing.

“With immersive solutions, either the customer knows exactly what they want to do, like 3D scanning, or they have a problem they need to solve,” St. John told me. “With Superfeet and DESMA, two partners with great expertise and market reach, we bring in 3D printing, manufacturing, IT infrastructure, and distribution. Together, that relationship is able to be really strong, to reinvent manufacturing.”

Comparing use of MJF versus traditionallly made custom insoles, Hayes pointed to benefits such as adjusting flexibility and more design possibilities, “more custom tweaks.”

“This is digital craftsmanship, it’s digitization of craft,” St. John said. “It’s a way to publish shoes.”

Discuss HP, Multi Jet Fusion, the future of manufacturing, and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts in the Facebook comments below.

[All photos: Sarah Goehrke]

 

Industrial 3D Manufacturing is Here: HP’s New Head of 3D Printing for Asia-Pacific and Japan Details Multi Jet Fusion Global Expansion

Rob Mesaros

Earlier this week, HP Inc. announced its latest global move with the new Lanwan Intelligence – HP Multi Jet Fusion Technology Mass Manufacturing Center in Dali, Foshan in Guangdong Province. Opened through a partnership with Guangdong (Dali) 3D Printing Collaborative Innovation Platform, the new 3D printing center is home to 10 Jet Fusion 3D printing systems, housing HP technology exclusively. The center is targeting production-grade applications at scale for automotive, consumer goods, and other verticals.

As their technology continues to grow as leading industrial 3D printing offering, HP recognizes that business strategy is best propelled by a best-fit team — and with the company’s disruptive ambitions, that team represents a critical aspect of strategy. With Multi Jet Fusion 3D printing technology advancing with rising installations around the world, we have been keeping up with the team at the heart of the growth.

Rob Mesaros is HP’s new Head of 3D Printing for Asia-Pacific and Japan, building upon his strong foundation of experiences with both HP and that region of the world. He was on-site at this past weekend’s opening of the new 3D printing center, and has thoughtfully provided us exclusive insights into what this move means for HP.

Stephen Nigro, President of 3D Printing, HP (left) with Rob Mesaros, Head of 3D Printing for Asia-Pacific and Japan, at the new 3D printing center in China

I appreciated the opportunity to hear directly from Mesaros with his perspective into HP’s offerings and strategies.

You just assumed a new position at HP as Head of 3D Printing for Asia-Pacific and Japan. What do you think has prepared you for this role?

“For starters, I’m a 12-year veteran at HP. Of course 3D printing wasn’t yet part of the plan when I started, but it’s another extension of HP’s spirit of reinvention, market disruption, and making life better for everyone that goes back to the company’s founding days. Most recently, I headed HP’s business in Australia & New Zealand as the Managing Director, and I’ve also served in various other roles in Hong Kong and Singapore, so I’ve had a rarified view into Asia’s many industries and cultures. One thing I’ve gained from that experience is the ability to see how important Asia will be to the growth of 3D manufacturing worldwide, which is among the main reasons why I jumped at the opportunity.”

What is it about Asia-Pacific in particular that’s unique in the global manufacturing system?

“Well, it’s the largest manufacturing market in the world by a considerable margin. China alone represents nearly half of the $12 trillion global manufacturing industry, as well as the world’s 2nd largest economy, which continues to surge. By those merits alone, the manufacturing market for the region is primed for a digital transformation that has already occurred in other major industries like finance and communications, but China is also the world-leader in chemicals development and manufacturing, and strong partnerships with global materials leaders to is at the crux of HP’s 3D printing partner ecosystem. No one company can drive change of this magnitude alone, it’s going to take a truly global village.”

HP just launched the first large-scale 3D manufacturing facility in Asia with China’s Guangdong (Dali) 3D Printing Collaborative Innovation Platform. What makes HP’s Multi Jet Fusion the right 3D printing technology for this new type of 3D factory?

“What makes Multi Jet Fusion right for this center, or any large manufacturing facility, is that we’ve cracked the code for large-scale digital production with incredibly advanced 3D printing technology, lower production costs, greater speed and reliability, dramatically less waste, voxel-level design and production control, and a collaborative 3D partner ecosystem – all of which are driving a new world of previously-impossible applications that are transforming major industries. We’re particularly excited to be launching this 3D factory of the future with Guangdong (Dali) 3D Printing Collaborative Innovation Platform in the world’s largest manufacturing market.”

How does this installation showcase HP’s global commitment to 3D printing / what message does this send to the industry?

“The main message is that industrial 3D manufacturing is here. It’s no longer a wishful notion. Companies like Guangdong (Dali) 3D Printing Collaborative Innovation Platform are providing large-scale, end-to-end 3D manufacturing right now with growing frequency. We’re seeing both new and existing customers increasingly make additional volume orders of HP Jet Fusion printers, as many as 16 at a time, to enable industrial-scale 3D manufacturing to meet growing demand.”

How will China figure in to HP’s global plans?

“China is already a central part of our global growth. China’s ‘Made in China 2025’ plan will be a tipping point for 3D printing technology’s adoption in this region. We are excited about the opportunity to contribute to this national initiative, as we continue to help local manufacturers deliver cost-effective and production-grade parts to accelerate their innovations more quickly and effectively. Our goal is to continue to drive full-production 3D printing since we introduced Multi Jet Fusion in Greater China last June with global leaders like Sinopec Yanshan Petrochemical Company joining our collaborative 3D Open Materials Platform, as well as a host of new partner-driven 3D printing facilities and HP 3D Printing Reference and Experience Centers across Beijing, Taipei, Chengdu, Guangzhou, Nanjing, Shanghai, and a growing number of other municipalities.”

What can we expect to hear come out of China with this center?

“We expect to see this center contribute greatly to the growth of industrial 3D manufacturing that’s been accelerating across China, and around the world. Specifically, we’re excited to watch the digital transformation of leading local industries in the Greater Bay Area of Southern China like automotive, consumer goods and motorcycles that will now be enabled by new, production-grade 3D applications at major scale.”

HP has not been playing its cards close to the vest in terms of broad ambition: the company means to use its 3D printing capabilities to disrupt the $12 trillion global manufacturing industry. With this goal in mind, HP has continued to pave its own way forward with Multi Jet Fusion 3D printing, including the full-color prototyping capabilities unveiled earlier this year and the promise of a metal system to come. Dedicated installation bases around the world, including the world’s major economies and manufacturing hubs, showcase the follow-through necessary for any great plan.

Multi Jet Fusion was announced only a few years ago, with its first installations in late 2016; with the speed of development possible through additive manufacturing and the swift progress of this new industrial technology suite, HP is proving to be both bullish and full-speed-ahead in fulfilling its ambitious intentions.

Discuss Multi Jet Fusion, global expansion, and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com, or share your thoughts in the Facebook comments below.

[Images provided by HP Inc.]

 

Workforce is Key to the Development of Additive Manufacturing: Interview with Women in Manufacturing

Opening this week’s Additive Manufacturing Symposium at Science in the Age of Experience, Allison Grealis, Founding President of Women in Manufacturing, took attendees on a journey of discovery surrounding the workforce. As 3D printing integrates more into the broader manufacturing industry, with production capabilities increasing and on-site installations rising, a skills gap remains a significant challenge and barrier to faster and broader adoption. The workforce in manufacturing, both existing and future, is in focus for Women in Manufacturing and other industry organizations striving to focus on the human aspect of industry.

The skills gap is an issue in itself, and a particular piece of that puzzle comes in the form of diversity of workforce. The Additive Manufacturing Symposium’s morning plenary session kicked off with Grealis’ presentation, “The State of Women & Additive Manufacturing,” laying the foundation for an informative day of industry discussion. Organizations, she explained, are becoming ever more aware of the need for diversity and the tangible benefits of a workforce drawing from more diverse backgrounds, applicable to all levels from production line to C-suite. The latter of these sees a notable lack of diversity, wiith women representing a minority. She cited figures to note that while women make up 49% of the US labor force, they represent only 29% of the manufacturing workforce. These figures have been rising, but disparity remains, as reported in studies from McKinsey and, targeted to additive manufacturing, Alexander Daniels Global.

In her presentation, Grealis discussed actionable steps that organizations can take to ensure that they bring in a strong variety of personnel throughout operations, as well as actionable steps women can take in pursuing manufacturing careers.

Organizations can:

  • Be sure the women you work with have interesting and challenging work
  • Provide feedback and positive affirmation
  • Encourage educational and training initiatives
  • Provide opportunities for professional development
  • Identify and improve the visibility of leaders


Women in additive can:

  • Establish a relationship with a mentor / become a mentor
  • Be visible! Take opportunities to speak on behalf of the industry / share your story
  • Educate and encourage the next generation of talent
  • Rise the ranks by positioning yourself for success / pave the way for others
  • Meet and connect with other like-minded industry women

Later in the day, I appreciated the opportunity to sit down with Grealis and discuss more of the issues and solutions for workforce development in additive manufacturing — an immediate illustration of her last action point for women, as it happened.

“Workforce is the key issue we’re combating,” she told me.

“This is one of the things that’s been a core focus for the organization since we got started. The skills gap is a big focus. When we talk to most companies, they have a slew of positions they’re seeking to fill, and we believe our organization can be a resource to filling those gaps. There are new opportunities that technology and additive manufacturing represent to women and men alike. We have a focus on the public perception issue, trying to influence a more positive image of manufacturing; we focus on parents, educators, and career counselors as much as on students and budding professionals. We share new technology components that would entice new workers and help to dispel myths that would discourage them.”

Initiatives surrounding workforce development represent a critical focus, Grealis underscored, with education and training imperative to the growth of a more advanced manufacturing sector. Encouraging the growth of women in the industry is a widespread effort, with many companies having created women’s affinity groups. Some of these, though, are groups in name alone, she said, and Women in Manufacturing is “working to create real vehicles to provide women with resources — in their company, and resources outside their individual company.”

One of the organization’s efforts is its Leadership Lab for Women in Manufacturing, launched with Case Western Reserve University’s (CWRU) Weatherhead School of Management and the support of the Women in Manufacturing Education Foundation (WiMEF). This Leadership Lab was launched in response to companies’ feedback that they had rising leaders in their ranks who weren’t yet equipped with all they needed, Grealis said. That type of responsiveness to real-world needs is necessary for the growth of positive structural development and encouraging leadership from within. Grealis pointed to efforts fostering training for management aptitude needed for success in leading teams and leading functions of responsibility within their organizations.

“Virtual training and learning is very important to us; we want to greatly expand this in the next few years,” she added. “We want to get down into the ranks to more women in manufacturing, many of whom don’t have the travel budget to go to Boston or Indianapolis [where WiM hosts events], and provide resources in how to get more training than just opportunities on the shop floor.”

Providing solutions is integral to Women in Manufacturing’s work and interest, as the organization seeks to “be a key solution provider to find and train and retain talent.” Since 2012, they have offered a direct job board through which companies can directly post jobs and job seekers can see what’s available, including apprenticeships and training, she noted. Networking is also key to the efforts, and advanced networking groups enable a valuable human resources resource, as well as a group for owners and senior executives. Discussion of best practices, and of support and advice, enables a unique setting “that isn’t happening naturally” as these twice-yearly events provide a confidential setting to talk about business.

“With all these efforts, the hope is to grow that percentage that we talked about this morning — we want to see that 29% rise closer to 50%. We want to grow not only the hourly ranks or the management ranks, but also C-suite ranks. Often there it’s under 10%, or single-digit, which is pretty disappointing,” Grealis continued.

“If you look at Forbes’ ranks of top female executives, the key most powerful women in business, most are with manufacturing companies, which is exciting. Now, we need to see more of them, to duplicate that ten-fold and fill more boardrooms with women. Most of those women came through the ranks. Most came up through technical fields, engineering and the like, and rose to lead these companies forward.”

Forbes’ list showcases an impressive array indeed of strong women leading businesses, and includes powerhouse quotes from powerhouse women. The list cites an interview with the Wall Street Journal from Mary Barra, CEO of General Motors and named at number five on the Forbes list:

“Cultivating diversity isn’t about taking a gender count when you walk into a room. It’s about valuing all ideas and building teams with different backgrounds and experiences.”

Looking specifically at additive manufacturing and the revolution surrounding digitization and an increase in cloud and other virtual resources, I asked Grealis how she saw these new technologies reshaping manufacturing and impacting the workforce.

“There should be more opportunities now. It’s not a women’s issue; it’s a people issue,” she said.

“Virtual capabilities are making work more humane; we don’t want to make work life. Companies are becoming more virtual, more flexible, and this makes not only manufacturing more appealing to women, but to millennials, to more generations — it’s become an attractive piece of manufacturing. You can’t just stop the manufacturing line because people want to go home. Virtual offerings, smart machines, and flexible hours are making more possible.”

She pointed to the example of a plant manager she spoke with recently who has found herself in a more humane work environment due to the flexibility enabled by checking virtually on production, allowing her to work more appealing hours while still keeping tabs on the happenings on the line.

For her part, Grealis’ background, with her father working in manufacturing, provided early exposure to these environments and providing a foundation from which she could understand the unique needs in manufacturing.

“I liked the excitement piece that it wasn’t dull; it’s not a traditional office intern experience when helping with things. Early exposure made me more open and excited when I came to metal forming after college,” she said. “I’ve always been very passionate about women’s issues. I’ve had a core passion always about advocating, and even thought for a short minute I would be a criminal lawyer. It’s come full circle to create an organization illuminating a population in manufacturing not often seen or heard from. I worked for a trade association working with metal forming companies, and worked with women leaders in metal forming. I found their unique needs were no different than women in different parts of manufacturing. At the tim, there wasn’t a resource around these individuals, and so we decided to start a conference that became our full service organization. It’s great to help provide power and support to this amazing community.”

Women in Manufacturing will be hosting its summit October 3-5 in Indianapolis, including several plant tours and networking events, alongside gathered experts, workshops, and roundtables.

Discuss workforce, Women in Manufacturing, and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts in the Facebook comments below.

[All photos: Sarah Goehrke]