Structo & pro3dure Partnering: Dental Customers Benefit from Expansion of Materials for Velox Ecosystem

Innovative materials once again merge with 3D printing hardware in an international collaboration as Structo announces a partnership with pro3dure to jointly offer products for the dental industry.

Structo is a leading dental 3D printing solutions provider, headquartered in Singapore, that we caught up with late last year after they completed a funding round that would not only allow them to continue with additive manufacturing innovations but also to expand their presence worldwide. Over the past couple of years they have also offered innovation in creating orthodontic aligners, automated post-processing, and more.

Germany’s pro3dure, founded in 2013, offers a focus on generative and subtractive manufacturing, while integrating them into digital fabrication. Their team specializes in matching customized materials to the workflow of each customer, emphasizing 3D printing. Pro3dure also offers the greatest selection of 3D printing resins for dental applications.

“We strive to make our range of dental materials as widely available as possible,” said Dr. Martin Klare, CEO of pro3dure. “The Structo Velox is a revolutionary ecosystem that will change how 3D printing is adopted in the dental office and we are proud to introduce our range of 3D printing resins with the world’s largest spectrum of dental applications available on that platform.”

Now, dental labs using the Velox ecosystem will be able to use pro3dure materials too as many new applications open to customers, allowing 3D printing of the following also:

  • Splints
  • Surgical guides
  • Indirect bonding trays
  • Temporaries

Indirect bonding trays

Huub van Esbroeck emphasizes how critical partnerships are, especially with closely related companies like pro3dure, allowing them to ‘push the envelope of chairside 3D printing’ within the dental industry.

“We are committed to continue developing the Velox ecosystem of hardware, software and materials to empower the delivery of same day dentistry” said Huub van Esbroeck, Founder at Structo. “Today’s announcement will see Velox users gain access to pro3dure’s range of industry-leading dental 3D printing materials which gives them a range of options for their in-office 3D printing needs.

“This is another step for us to provide more options to all Velox users worldwide and we will continue working with industry leaders to add more value and streamline the chairside 3D printing workflow for our industry,” continued van Esbroeck. “We started off with just the hardware that does the print, wash and cure cycle of a 3D printing workflow. With more partnerships like these, we are confident that the Velox ecosystem will be able to empower dentists to deliver better patient care with revolutionary new solutions,” Huub added.

Many innovations continue within 3D printing, and specifically for the dental industry with progress in creating dental implants, targeting mass production of digital fabrication in dentistry, and more. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

[Source – Images: Structo/pro3dure]

The post Structo & pro3dure Partnering: Dental Customers Benefit from Expansion of Materials for Velox Ecosystem appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Interview with Firoza Kothari of Anatomiz3D

OEMs, materials companies and medical device firms are doing a lot of work with 3D Printing. What we’re not seeing is a lot of medical startups in the field. We’re not really seeing services emerge that facilitate medical models, medical device work or the development of medical solutions. Many people will tell you that patient-specific implants and medical 3D printing is a potentially large market, but where is the economic activity? And where are the companies that are going to facilitate this? One of the precious few is Anatomiz3D. The India based firm is offering a whole host of services and parts to the medical community. Firms like Anatomiz3D are essential if we want 3D printing in medical to spread and acellerate. I was very enthused to interview Firoza Kothari and learn more about them.

What is Anatomiz3D?

Anatomiz3D is an organization, which coalesces medical with the manufacturing industry, yielding customized solutions for medical applications. Our motto is to purvey personalized care in the form of Pre-surgical planning, Cutting and Drilling surgical guides, Custom Orthotics, Patient-specific implants and Implant moulds through the route of 3D Modelling and 3D printing technique.

We are consultants, trainers and partners to anyone who wishes to explore the medical field in AM, be it the surgical segment, education segment or medical device innovation. Our aim is to make this technology accessible to as many people as possible.

We have thorough knowledge and expertise to support and assist curative, restorative healthcare institutes. We aspire to see all the medical centres implementing this technology at their point-of-care. This will decrease the diagnostic time and get immediate care response in emergency cases.

An example of a calcified aortic valve

Why do you specialize in healthcare?

As a Biotech Engineer myself, my interest was highly piqued when I was introduced to 3D Bioprinting during my research about 3D Printing. With a vision to someday culture tissues and organs in a lab, Anatomiz3D started its journey towards personalised healthcare in a country like India which has immense surgical talent but also a population of 1.3B people to cater too. Surgical procedures need to be faster, easier and more precise to increase access to more patients.

What does that mean for your customers?

With aid from this technology, surgeons will be able to provide patient specific solutions that help with faster recovery and better quality of life for their patients. Surgical decision and procedures can be accelerated and lead to lesser probability of re-do surgeries. 

Once medical set-up implements 3D printing at their Point-of-care, it will cater to all the cases well within the processing time than currently being utilised. It will make this personalization process a standard of care, which the centres and the patient both could benefit out of.

A Criss cross heart whereby the inflow ventricles of the heart are intertwined.

How did you get started? 

Our first ever case was in Paediatric Cardiology, wherein a 6 month old infant was suffering from a complex congenital heart disease called DORV (Double Outlet Right Ventricle) with VSD (Ventricular Septal Defect). This patient was initially rejected for surgery considering the complications associated with a procedure of this level. But the medical team had heard of 3D Printing and reached out to us (Back then we were doing our pilots through our now sister concern – Sahas Softech) to take up the case, hoping to still be able to provide the infant with a last chance at a procedure. We designed the heart of the infant in collaboration with the medical team, studied the model together to understand the risks and the complications, and to our delight, they realised that the patient can actually be given the best possible surgical output. This was our first success story and it was also a huge boost to find out that this was the first ever case in India, not only in Paediatric Cardiology, but also in Soft Tissue Modelling over all. Since then, we have opened up multiple such avenues of application and intend to continue doing so.

What kind of parts do you make?

Our focus is always patient-centric. As per the doctor’s or surgeons’ requirement, we design the applications to serve their purposes. Our applications range from Pre-surgical planning, Cutting and Drilling Surgical Guides, Custom Orthotics, Patient-specific implants and Implant moulds.

Considering our experience with over 700 live cases, we have a library of complex cases across specialisations that serve as great teaching and training tools, reducing the need for cadavers and allowing for reproducible training across various locations and making learning possible to everyone.

Who are your customers? 

Our proficiency lies in Soft tissue and bone modeling, cutting and drilling guides, custom implant designing, education models, product development, Hospital set-up Consultancy. We provide services to Hospitals, Doctors, Surgeons, 3D printing service providers, Medical device companies, Medical universities, etc.

What are your parts used for?

There are distinct advantages of our products and services

For the Surgeon

  • Addition to current 2D imaging techniques

  • Decision making: whether to operate a patient or not

  • Faster and more precise Patient Specific treatment planning

  • Student/Resident Education model

  • Such planning and practicing helps the medical team feel prepared and confident

  • Implant pre-contouring

  • Tools selection and Trajectory of screws can be fixed

  • Improved communication within the team

For the Hospital

  • OT time can be reduced
  • More operations performed in a day
  • The success rate can be defined over time
  • More patient intake

For the Patient

  • Reduced blood loss
  • Reduced time under anesthesia
  • Reduced overall costs
  • Improved recovery time

Why do customers choose you?

Garnering success in 700 plus cases, our establishment has made enormous progress and gathered proficiency over the years. This success was only possible due to the efforts we put as a team, along with support from the medical community, and try our best to make sure the doctor’s work is made easy and the patient can lead his life with high quality.

What technologies do you use?

We use an array of technologies such as SLA, SLS, CJP, FDM, Polyjet and DMLS. The choice of technology and material depends on the final application. We consult on the same by understanding the requirements.

How do you print guides?

We understand the osteotomy that the surgeon wishes to perform and the final result they aim to achieve. Accordingly, a jig is printed in a Biocompatible and an Autoclavable material that can be used in the OT on the patient.

What certifications do you have?

As a medical device company in customized products, we are in the process of gaining our ISO 13485 certification. Apart from that, we use FDA and CE certified softwares to carry out our segmentation work, to ensure the accuracy of patient data.

So you also do implant design and personalization?

The objective to merge 3D printing technology with medical was to provide an advanced, customized solution in each case. Initially, Doctors share their requirement and the patient’s data with us. With the information provided, Anatomiz3D’s team of engineers design and 3D print the customized implants according to the patient anatomy. This enables the doctor to perform the case smoothly and give a personalized solution to the patient’s case.

How do you work with pharma companies?

Pharma and medical device companies use our products during their product development phase, validation phase, or even as marketing tools. Customized patient data can really help them test their products across a lot of data.

What partners, are you looking for?

We are looking forward to partnerships with Hospitals to set up Point Of Care centers, Medical Device Companies to assist them in product development, 3D Printing OEMs and Service Bureaus to aid them in any medical requests, Medical Institutions to enhance training and Education.

What is holding 3D printing back?

Medical was in dire need of technological advancement to decrease the response time and provide a prompt, customized solution to their patients. As the technology is in its nascent stage, the foremost issue is acceptance. Initially, there is resistance seen toward a transformation. At first, people are sceptical to make the transit from their traditional methods. Then there is a question of cost, material capability, timelines, accurate designs and a few others to name.

The post Interview with Firoza Kothari of Anatomiz3D appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Interview with Glassomer’s Dorothea Helmer: 3D Printing Fused Silica Glass on Desktop SLA Machines

Dr. rer. nat. Dorothea Helmer specializes in organic and inorganic chemistry and works at Glassomer. Along with Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Bastian E. Rapp and Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kotz she co-founded the company. Glassomer is trying to solve one of the most difficult and elusive problems in 3D printing, 3D printing glass, and optically clear components. The path they have chosen is to use stereolithography resins to make fused silica glass. The firm has found methods to make glass through methods usually reserved for polymers. Glassomer’s work really blew me away and I was just as amazed that there wasn’t more press about this incredible technology. In a technologically-astounding manner, we can now create optical objects with standard desktop machines (and debinding and sintering equipment).

The Glassomer Team (Image: Markus Breig/KIT.)

What is Glassomer?

The Glassomer GmbH is a start-up situated in Freiburg, Germany. Glassomer invented and patented a technology that lets us process glass like a polymer – hence Glass-o-mer. The process is based on a resin that contains a large amount of glass particles that can be structured by UV light, for instance in the 3D printer. After developing the parts are processed in an oven to give transparent fused silica glass.

What products do you make?

We sell the resins for molding and for stereolithography printing. We further do feasibility studies and small series prototyping of custom glass products.

Why is fused silica glass interesting?

Fused silica glass is a highly interesting material due to its outstanding optical transparency combined with its high chemical and thermal resistance and pleasant haptics. That makes it interesting for optics, as well as chemical glass ware but also decorative objects.

How can I 3D Print it?

The Glassomer material can be printed using standard benchtop stereolithography printers as long as the printer is material open.

From start to finish how does the manufacturing of a part work?

Glassomer resins can be shaped using a benchtop stereolithography printer or by casting against molds made our of e.g. silicones. Like other resins, the material polymerizes under UV light. The parts are washed and then processed at high temperature to give transparent fused silica glass. This process is executed in two steps: removal of the resin and sintering of the glass particles.

Do I need specialized equipment?

The printing process needs a standard, material open stereolithography printer. The thermal debinding process needs a programmable oven with temperatures up to 600 °C. Sintering requires an oven that withstands 1300 °C.

Is the process predictable?

During the sintering process the part shrinks but the shrinkage is completely isotropic (the same in each direction) and thus highly predictable and can be easily calculated in advance. For makers, they just need to resize their original print by the percentage of the shrinkage. For the Glassomer L50 formulation the linear shrinkage is 15.6 %.

Is it optically clear?

The finished part is completely transparent and clear. Fused silica is the purest glass out there, and it shows a high optical transparency throughout the wavelength spectrum of ultraviolet, visible and infrared light.

What can It be used for?

It can be used for printing optical parts, small chips or decorative objects. In general, for everything that requires high transparency and small structures, Glassomer is the material of choice.

What customers are you seeing?

Glass is a versatile material used in a great variety of fields. Our customers come from different fields like optics & photonics, chemistry, MedTec. But we also get a lot of interest form the jewellery, art and design sectors.

What do you hope to achieve?

Glassomer has the potential to revolutionize the way we fabricate glasses. Glass shaping has always been a challenge – up until now it is not something that people could be easily be doing at home. Now working with glasses is as simple as working with polymer clay. We want to make glasses accessible to every modern fabrication technology – besides 3D printing that includes high-throughput processes like industrial molding. This way high precision glass parts will become customizable and affordable. In the future, all compact optics like the cameras in smartphones will be made from glass – ensuring a higher quality and robustness.

What do you expect to be able to make in mSLA?

Glasses are the number one material used in data transfer – fast internet connections rely on glass fibre cables. Those cables need to be connected to the electronics that we ultimately use for generating the data. Using mSLA and 2-photon polymerization we want to make compact optics and connectors to ensure a higher transfer efficiency.

How strong and durable is it?

The material is real fused silica glass. It is not the same glass we use for e.g. windows, it is of much higher purity. Fused silica is very stable against chemicals or heat. Upon heating it almost does not expand, thus you can (other than our everyday glassware) put it in a flame of 1000 C and then instantly cool it under water without causing cracks. It is, however, a glass – if you hit it with enough force, it will break.

What other variants will you develop?

So far the material is accessible to stereolithography printing we will further develop technologies for fused deposition modeling and other forms of 3D printing and industrial molding.

What is holding back 3D Printing?

We still live in a world of abundance – the industry will need more time to understand that the future of fabrication is high-quality on-demand customized products instead of unspecific over-production. 3D printing still needs to improve in terms of production fidelity, production speed as well as available materials. At Glassomer we constantly work on expanding the material palette of 3D printing and hope to contribute a significant part to the industrial advance of 3D printing.

The post Interview with Glassomer’s Dorothea Helmer: 3D Printing Fused Silica Glass on Desktop SLA Machines appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Interview with Mitch Debora of Mosaic Manufacturing on the Palette

Mitch Debora is the CEO of Mosaic Manufacturing. His company came out with the innovative Palette in 2018 which let users mix different filaments in desktop FDM 3D printers and then improved it with the Palette 2. The Palette is an add on to existing printers and can broaden the scope of things that people can make with desktop machines including using more colors and mixing different hardnesses and materials. Now they firm has come up with the Palette 2S ($599), Palette 2S Pro ($799, better splicing) and the Canvas Hub S (cloud-based slicing, and color indication, $139). The Palette’s, and Canvas Hub are interesting products and comprise of a very tiny movement towards a “3D printer aftermarket” so we caught up with Mitch to find out more.

Who buys the Palette?

Businesses and individuals who own FFF 3D printers that are limited to printing in 1 or 2 materials. With Palette, they are able to virtually upgrade their printer to being a quad extruder printer allowing them to print with 4 colors and materials. The primary verticals where Palette is used is in education, product design, prototyping, and small-batch production.

What is it used for?

The multi-material aspect of Palette is commonly used to enable soluble support material for printing complex geometries with internal support requirements. The multi-color functionality is often used for part serialization, branding, and the simulation of overmolded parts. Finally, the material handling automation from Palette is used to unlock spool-to-spool printing which automats the process of switching spools between prints, or during prints.

How do I indicate colors in the software?

CANVAS has a toolbox with a color palette of 4 color options. You can indicate the colors you plan to use and assign them to specific regions, or virtually paint your model.

How does it work?

CANVAS is a cloud and web-based software that allows users to color and slice single or multi-material models. You start off by selecting a single-body STL that brings up different tool options, one of them being the paint feature. This tool allows you to digitally paint the surface of your model. Similar to other design applications, there are brush tools and a fill bucket. Specific to CANVAS is the ability to analyze a model and create various different “regions”. These regions are based on unique geometries in your part and allow you to quickly specify colors using the fill tool. Once painting is complete, the model is ready to be sliced. CANVAS uses the painted colors while it slices and, unlike other programs, it does not split the model into separate STLs but rather, the color is applied on a layer-by-layer basis. This allows the creation of larger regions of each color inside the part, for better print quality and part strength.

What do you hope to achieve?

At Mosaic, we want to make multi-material 3D printing as easy and accessible as possible. We are always learning and working on ways to improve our current ecosystem and provide options that are consistently exceptional and more reliable than what currently exists in the industry.

Can I make gradient color parts?

Palette supports gradient mode, which allows you to create models with a gradual color change throughout the models. No transition tower is created as the color transitions occur within the print itself. When you turn on Palette and select Print Modes, you are able to select Gradient and enter in the starting and ending length of filament, which will help determine the lengths used for the first and last pieces of filament for the print. This can easily be done from the color touch screen on Palette allowing you to easily print any model with a gradient. Palette also has similar modes on the screen for printing a “repeating pattern” or “random pattern”. We see a lot of use of this functionality in schools and by artists.

Can I also mix different materials?

Palette supports different filament combinations, and we’re constantly experimenting to find new material combinations that work together. Some of the popular combinations are PLA with PVA, ABS with HIPS, PLA with Poly support, and PLA with PETG (breakaway support). Materials can easily be specified in Canvas allowing it to take care of material specific splice settings, printing temperatures, and other printing parameters.

The post Interview with Mitch Debora of Mosaic Manufacturing on the Palette appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Mayo Clinic is Using 3D Printing to Teach the Next Generation of Spine Surgeons

Resident life is hard. After years of living, studying, and breathing medicine, they are finally one step closer to officially being able to practice. Medical residencies can take three years for primary care physicians, but some surgical specialties require even more training time to develop new procedures without risking lives, sometimes up to seven years. And did we mention that training is not a breeze? Its hard work and some of it is not for the queasy.

Residents need cadavers for educational purposes, but these are difficult to come by. In the United States, only 20,000 bodies are donated to science every year, that’s barely enough to satisfy a population of more than 27,000 residents. Plus you need to add the costs of purchasing them, according to an article by The New York Times, delivery of an intact cadaver costs as little as $1,000, but different specialists seek out specific pieces of anatomy for their work, and individual parts can be expensive, such as a torso in good conditions which can go for $5,000, or a spine for $3,500. With residents needing more than one cadaver to practice on and clinics usually having only limited resources, there is a sensical need to find new ways to educate the next generation of doctors. For William Clifton, Neurosurgery Resident at the Mayo Clinic in Florida, it seemed there had to be another way to train surgeons, so he consulted with an engineer, who was also a friend, and realized that creating 3D printed models for medicine and simulators for resident training could be the solve-all solution.

Clifton had an idea which involved buying an Ultimaker S5 FDM desktop printer with a personal loan, and finding room at home to begin printing out models in his free time, not an entirely easy job considering the young doctor and his wife have four children. But Clifton, one of the first recipients of the Mayo Clinic John H. and Carolyn O. Sonnentag Neurosurgery Residency in Florida, was on a mission, one he became very passionate about, using 3D printing technology to build simulators that can be used to train residents for surgery. Along his path, he ran into Aaron Damon, a researcher and lab specialist at the Simulation Center at Mayo Clinic, and immediately discovered that they shared a desire to change the future of resident training.

His early designs helped him build the training models used today. Since last March, they have developed hundreds of their original Biomimetic Human Tissue Simulators, more than 30 peer-reviewed publications, as well as several patent submissions for neurosurgical devices. The Department of Neurologic Surgery also became heavily engaged in planning for dedicated neurosurgery 3D printing space and there is now a materials science laboratory based on the ideas and infrastructure Clifton helped create. Today their lab houses three FDM printers: two Ultimaker S5 and one Raise3D Pro for bigger volumes, such as when they need to print cases of scoliosis (a medical condition in which a person’s spine has a sideways curve) to help residents that need to deal with pediatric scoliosis. 

“We are using 3D printed patient-specific models in a certain way to characterize the material properties of actual bone, soft tissue, muscle, ligaments, tendons, and more, exactly how it is in vivo,” said Clifton in an interview with 3DPrint.com. “The big innovation is that our models exhibit the same biomechanics as the human spine or the human skull so that the surgeon can see where the structures are in realtion to each other, bend and move them, as well as watch how the dynamic relations change.” 

According to Mayo Clinic, the 3D printing process comprises stripping down information from a patient’s CT scan and converting the image to stereolithography. Based on spatial information, Mayo Clinic can program the printer to create patient-specific models, such as anatomically precise vertebrae. Physician-scientists use these surgical training models in tandem with resources provided by the J. Wayne and Delores Barr Weaver Simulation Center at Mayo Clinic’s campus in Florida. The Weaver Simulation Center partnered with Clifton to share his 3D training models with surgical learners.

The real innovation was simulating human tissue and creating a new polymer for FDM 3D printing of anatomical models that will be used for practicing pre-surgical operations using electrocautery, something that has never been done before. The innovative new polymer chemistry and the 3D printed film should be commercially available soon as Clifton and Damon are in talks with multiple companies through Mayo Clinic Ventures (the business office at Mayo that handles this type of negotiations and commercialization).

3D printed phantom for teaching neurosurgical trainees the freehand technique of C2 laminar screw placement

“The faculty is ecstatic about this project because the skill of the residents has gone up considerably. Traditionally interns learn on cadavers or during the residency in living people. For example, surgical residents have to learn to place screws into the C2 vertabrae and this is a complex procedure because they are learning to navigate between the vertebral artery and the spinal cord; but with our models they can practice puting in a couple of hundred C2 pedicle screws so that when they go to the Operating Room (OR) they know exactly what to do, because they have done it so many times on such reallistic models,” claimed Clifton, whose specialty as a neurosurgeon leads him to perform surgery on the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves.

Mayo Clinic is all about research, education and patient care, which is why Damon and Clifton are printing their way into teaching future doctors how to take care of the next generation of patients. The duo gets along extremely well, understanding that cooperation and collaboration are one of the keys of their success, which will shortly be used in the other two Mayo Clinics, in Rochester and Arizona. In the short eight months since their adventure began, they have created 14 different models for spine pathologies alone, and now they will begin developing brain models. Damon indicated that they have a brain tumor resection model in the works, “that residents can use to practice the removal of a brain tumor, coagulation of vessels, measuring blood loss, brain manipulation, and even brain mapping, meaning that now we are going into the microsurgery skill set, and not just spinal surgeries.” 

“We can print a lot of different pathologies, wereas you are kind of limited with a cadaver. With 3D prinitng you can model specific pathologies after a patient, as well as complex and rare pathologies that residents might not see that often in the OR,” explained Damon. “This is a very specific and universal development at the same time, because we hope that other clinics around the world that barely have any access to cadavers for resident training, can use them and eventually this will improve outcomes and lives all over the world.” 

Each simulator costs approximately $50, whereas a cadaver normally purchased for this type of surgery training can run into the thousands, helping Mayo Clinic save thousands of dollars as well. The medical center, which ranks as the best clinic for neurosurgery worldwide, will still get cadavers of course; but Clifton recalled that he spent over $50,000 in just three months, on cadaveric tissue for research and education in 2018. That experience and the reality of the burden of costs behind his training is one of the reasons that sparked the interest in developing a more cost-effective way to practice.

“One of the distinct advantages of FDM 3D printing specifically is that it allows us to build models made from different material compositions and properties. We do this to simulate different disease processes for resident training, and to approach patient care and surgical planning in an individualized way,” said Clifton.

Clifton and Damon want to take this technology to the point where it is streamlined so that residents will have dedicated simulation training. The key is that even before they hit the OR, they have done the procedure at least 10 times, and not just the simplest parts of the procedure, but also all the complex elements. Their hope for the future is that this will become a standardized model in the US.

Damon suggested that a big part of their work has been refining and validating their models until they achieved a high fidelity that is comparable to cadavers. “With these simulators, residents are able to acquire the same skill level as surgeons who have been in the field for many years by high fidelity and cost-effective repeated practice. The support we get from Mayo Clinic also allows our creativity to grow and continue to push the boundaries of innovation in 3D printing.”

Damon suggested that “even in our lab at Mayo, there were up to five surgical residents sharing one cadaveric torso, but now each person can have their own model and countless amount of experience, which is invaluable.” The two experts claim that training on cadavers gives residents one chance of getting a procedure right, while models can be 3D printed hundreds of times. 

Three of Clifton’s patients recently benefited from his applications in 3D printing. The unique models contributed to surgical planning sessions, helped to pinpoint precise diagnoses and guided postoperative management choices. The first patient had a congenital spinal deformity, the next had a large metastatic tumor near the lumbar spine, and the third had a rare cyst compressing her brainstem. All three patients have recovered from their successful surgeries because of the combined forces of innovation and surgical skills.

“We are really looking into the education component, trying to obtain a better, safer and cheaper solution for the future. My goal is to teach the next generation of residents to become great spine surgeons.”

[Image credit: Mayo Clinic]

The post Mayo Clinic is Using 3D Printing to Teach the Next Generation of Spine Surgeons appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Interview with Lockheed: “Orion Spacecraft Has 200 3D Printed Components”

In 2006, NASA selected Lockheed Martin to design, develop, and build Orion, set to embark on both manned and unmanned missions, it is the agency’s newest deep space exploration spaceship that will eventually carry astronauts from the Earth to the Moon, and back. As part of a plan to extend a sustained human presence beyond low Earth orbit (LEO), advance commerce and science in space, the Artemis program is the next step in human space exploration and a part of NASA’s broader Moon to Mars approach. In 2022, the Orion crew capsule is expected to take astronauts on a ride beyond LEO, to the Moon and back, and in five years it will transport the next people to a lunar orbital post.

NASA’s Orion spacecraft has been using additive manufacturing technologies exponentially. Lockheed Martin and NASA recently announced the completion of the Orion crew and service module being developed for the uncrewed Artemis I mission, which used 100 3D printed parts. While the spacecraft for the Artemis II mission has Lockheed developing close to 200 3D printed parts.

The Orion crew module for Exploration Mission 1 that will launch atop NASA’s Space Launch System rocket on its first uncrewed integrated flight (Image credit: NASA)

Last September, NASA, and Lockheed finalized a contract for the production and operations of six Orion spacecraft missions with an option to order up to 12 in total. The agency’s Orion Production and Operations Contract (OPOC) is an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract for NASA to issue both cost-plus-incentive-fee and firm-fixed-price orders. Initially, NASA has ordered three Orion spacecraft for Artemis missions III through V for $2.7 billion. Then in 2022, the agency plans to order three additional Orion spacecraft for Artemis missions VI through VIII for $1.9 billion. Up to six additional Orion spacecraft may be ordered under the IDIQ contract through 2030, leveraging spacecraft production cost data from the previous six missions to enable the lowest possible unit prices.

During an interview with Lockheed Martin Space’ specialists Brian Kaplun, Manager of the Additive Manufacturing Lab, and Colin Sipe, Orion Crew Systems Senior Manager, 3DPrint.com delved into the makings of America’s next spacecraft for a new generation of explorers.

How has additive manufacturing helped in the creation of more efficient spacecraft?

“One of the tenants of advanced manufacturing is to increase the cost and the schedule efficiency for any of our platforms, including Orion, and doing so in a way that, at the very least, maintains parity from a technical perspective but in many cases enhances that. So a lot of the work we’ve done with Orion was targeted to allow for a more efficiently reusable, cost-competitive and faster time to delivery spacecraft that will have a better technical performance. For example our docking hatch covers were printed in a cost and schedule effective manner; additionally, thanks to a new ESD compliant polymer (a type of no-static plastic) we provided more technical performance as well,” suggested Kaplun. “AM is one tool in the advance manufacturing toolbox that really allows us to hit all three of those valuable points. The plan is to continue creating AM components that we already utilized and look at increasing the number.”

While Colin Sipe explained that “we do a lot of parts that would be traditionally difficult to produce, such as structural components and brackets, different parts to channel airflow, or fuel containers, like hydrogen fuel tanks. Moreover, on the seats that the astronauts will use on Orion, we 3D printed different spacers (parts that go between the edge of the seat and the hip of the astronaut) and those come in various sizes based on the astronaut using it. We have to be able to accommodate from 1 to 99th percentile of the average American size individual.”

Do 3D printed parts withstand some of the harshest conditions in space?

“We fully qualify any of our spacecraft and platforms, and it is a qualification born of many years of doing this. On 2011 we launched the first-ever 3D printed part going to outer space on our Juno mission and right now those parts are orbiting the gas giant. So just as rigorous as we did in 2011, here in the last throes of 2019 we have to go through and really qualify any of the Orion parts. Even more so, with future manned missions, we are going to further stress those qualifications. Its a challenge that we are very experienced in and really believe we are up for,” claimed Kaplun. “Experience in any way, shape or form is going to be a competitive advantage for Lockheed.”

How do you choose the design for the 3D printed parts?

“We have produced many different parts for our customers that almost have an organic shape to them and so if you look at some of the new designs where you are optimizing for strength in terms of weight and producibility, you will observe that they mimic the bones in your arm like a very evolved and efficient method of support. If we look at some of the structural brackets that we have done, they almost have a tree or a skeletal structure look to them, that is a very unique mindset or would have been a unique mindset when we were looking at the substractive and traditional manufacturing. But now that people are being trained for AM, we notice that there are a lot more technically complex designs. Some of the ESD parts that we made for Orion would be virtually imposible ot make any other way,” revealed Kaplun. “Now, we are able to combine a large number of other parts into one piece and eliminate a lot of the fasteners and the weight that otherwise would have been a parasitic load, providing greater opportunities to put payloads and scienitic instruments onto our platforms.”

In what way does 3D printing drive down spacecraft costs?

“We try for a really ambitious cost reduction, aiming at 50%. Over the last year, we printed roughly 6,500 parts across our entire space division. Recently we even used AM technology to develop mockups for tests, such as the toilet that will be used on Orion, called the UWMS,” proposed Sipe. “We were concerned about one area of interference so we printed the entire mockup of the toilet and put it into the flight vehicle to verify that we could reach and access the bolts. The size of that toilet is probably two feet in diameter and three feet tall, so it was a very large piece to produce.”

How does Lockheed factor in sustainability when 3D printing its pieces?

Kaplun indicated that at Lockheed, engineers are “very proud of how sustainable our technology is. Our polymer builds can be recycled and reused if needed, the powder bed processes are extremely efficient and the industry as a whole is considered very sustainable and cost-efficient from a materials perspective. Some of the waste for our additive processes can be lower than five percent. When you compare that to some of the subtractive and traditional manufacturing applications, those numbers flip completely, producing 90% waste.” 

Would you be able to convey how many AM parts were used for Orion?

“We made 200 components for the Artemis II Orion spacecraft. While the Artemis I had over 100 printed pieces and the previous version had only four 3D printed parts. This reveals that only one spacecraft generation later, we were able to double the amount of 3D printed parts,” reported Sipe. 

A 3D printed titanium part for NASA’s Orion spacecraft (Image credit: Lockheed Martin)

What can we expect to see during the Artemis II mission scheduled for late 2020?

“Our next mission will launch Orion on a Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, which will be the largest rocket ever built as far as liftoff power. Next year we can expect an unmaned service module to travel to the lunar orbit where it will stay for a month, carry out significant checkouts of all of our modules and will be the first launch on the new rocket. Once it returns to Earth, we will recover it, take it apart, see what we can reuse, what we need to make some improvements on, and at the same time, we’ll be getting ready for our Artemis II mission, with the first astronauts flying on 2022. Then, Artemis III in 2024, will take astronauts to Gateway, a small space station in the lunar orbit, and from there to a human landing system that will put the first woman and next man on the Moon surface. This will be the first of many missions to the Moon’s south pole, where bases and moon mining will begin,” said Sipe.

Are there more engineers interested in AM technology applications?

According to Kaplun, there has been much interest in AM: “we are witnessing a lot of students and scholars contributing to the design space, coming into our engineering and production ranks with a lot of previous work in the field, with new ideas and new abilities to utilize the tools that we can now offer.” 

As an engineer, how do you change your mindset to produce something from a subtractive standpoint to an additive one?

“We are starting to corrupt the threshold as we are beginning to design parts that can only be made via the additive route, whereby in the past we would sort of take something that was designed for a normal conventional machine and then transition it to the additive world,” told Sipe. “Today we are generating designs that we know the only way they can be made is through AM. There are certain parts of the spacecraft that couldn’t be done with other technologies, such as hollow, organically grown on the printer parts that create new opportunities for us.” 

3D printed Orion docking hatch cover (Image credit: Lockheed Martin)

What 3D printing technologies are being used at Lockheed?

“We have a very large gamut of different types of technologies to make the 3D printed parts for Orion, the docking hedge covers were made on Stratasys FDM printers, but we also use a lot of metal powder bed technologies in various forms as well as different polymer technologies,” the experts proposed. 

3D printed Orion docking hatch cover made of PEKK thermoplastic (Image credit: Lockheed Martin)

So what lays ahead for the aerospace company?

“We just got into a long term production contract with NASA for the six upcoming spacecraft missions, so I believe it is our goal to make even more 3D printed parts for spacecraft. A big focus of the contract was to dramatically reduce per-vehicle costs and the major ways of doing that was by having reusable Orion crew modules and systems, using advanced manufacturing technologies, material and component bulk buys and an accelerated mission cadence. I consider that AM is a large part of reducing the cost and increasing the cadence of how often we fly,” enlightened Kaplun.

Both Kaplun and Sipe consider that the “Orion spacecraft is part of NASA’s backbone for deep space exploration.”

The completed Orion spacecraft crew module at the NASA Kennedy Space Center (Image credit: Lockheed Martin)

 

With work well underway on both the Artemis I and II rockets, with core stage assembly nearly complete at Michoud, Orion will leave Lockheed for testing at NASA’s Stennis Space Center near Bay St. Louis, in Mississippi.

Sipe concluded that: “In 1981, NASA wanted to move back into deep space so since 1981 we were flying the space shuttle, and physically could not go outside the Earth’s orbit, the Apollo was the last spacecraft that physically could leave the gravity of the Earth and move into deep space, and NASA had a desire for mankind to return. Orion is the only spacecraft development that is a true exploration class spacecraft. It’s not like any other, it has unique capabilities never before seen and even though the capsule is a heritage of the Apollo mission, its actually far superior.” 

The post Interview with Lockheed: “Orion Spacecraft Has 200 3D Printed Components” appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Michael Gorski of Filament Innovations On FDM for Manufacturing

I kept hearing from people about Michael Gorski and Filament Innovations. I was repeatably told that in Pennsylvania a small firm was making open FDM systems made for manufacturing. I’ve predicted for a number of years now that the small scale open desktop FDM systems, first not suitable for much of anything, would morph into the manufacturing systems of the future over time. I really think that for large objects such as car bumpers or dashboards medium format FDM will be the technology of choice while for many smaller parts clusters of FDM printers will be the norm. Open FDM just gives you tough, dimensionally accurate parts at low cost without a lock in with a materials vendor or an OEM. For many industries at volume I think that open FDM is the manufacturing solution of the future. For that to happen we need intelligent clusters of machines (which Ultimaker and Prusa seem to be working on) and much more reliable medium format machines with high throughput, yield, and repeatability. The latter challenge is what Filament Innovations is taking on.

 

What is Filament Innovations? 

Filament Innovations is a family-owned FDM 3D Printer manufacturer located near Allentown, Pennsylvania. We focus on selling FDM printers to businesses across America. We specialize in advanced 3D Printers that are both robust and affordable for all size businesses. We really pride ourselves on the level of quality and craftsmanship that goes into each 3D Printer we build. We often tell our customers that we are the “hot rod shop” of 3D Printers as we can custom build a printer to suit a customer’s needs.

When and why did you start it? 

The company was started in October 2015; when we launched we were not building printers, but selling our own private line of filament. As FDM 3D Printing grew, we saw the hardware market get split into two segments – the “race to the bottom” imported printer and the expensive larger format printers, costing over $50,000. Many business owners who wanted to adopt FDM 3D Printing were scared of the lack of after-sales support and reliability from the imported machines, or did not have $50,000 on hand for a capital investment to buy a more well-known machine. With that in mind, we quickly saw market opportunity for a large scale, American built, and high quality FDM unit in the $15,000 – $20,000 range. 

Tell us about your Icarus printer? 

Our BFP-ICARUS 3D Printer is the backbone of the company. Our business model is simple, make the best printer we can with no cheap add-ons and sell it for one flat, shipped price with as many USA components as possible. At $15,000 shipped via LTL Freight, our BFP-ICARUS is a leader in the FDM market in terms of quality and craftsmanship. Our linear motion system is a full ballscrew design with HiWin linear rails and TBI ballscrews, running on custom made NEMA 23 motors. Our extrusion system is produced by Dyze Designs, with their PRO series hotend and extruder combination, which comes equipped with a PT100 sensor and Tungsten Carbide nozzle. Every printer is factory equipped with a Gecko print plate, allowing customers to print common filaments and have them release easily with the removable print plate. The entire frame of the printer is wrapped in quarter inch Optix USA Made acrylic which stiffens the entire body of the unit so you don’t have to worry about any frame slag or shaking. The build area satisfies customers’ needs at 470x381x915 (mm).

What kind of customers buy it?

We love selling printers to industries that put them to work and use them on a daily basis. The majority of our customers are in the Prosthetics and Orthotics industry where they print customized below the knee check sockets for patients. Since every prosthetic socket is unique, this is a great application for our BFP-ICARUS units. Beyond the O&P market, we also work with the US Army Research lab and the Navy, specifically NAWC (Naval Air Warfare Center). We are continuing to grow our relationship with other defense departments and are in the planning phase of putting more BFP-ICARUS units into defense work soon. 

What makes it different?

What makes the BFP-ICARUS different in terms of being an FDM Printer, and Filament Innovations different in terms of being a FDM manufacturer, is how we do business in the industry. At Filament Innovations we are not selling you a product and then moving on to the next customer, we are creating a partnership to bring FDM 3D Printing into their company. Businesses can be hesitant to buy an FDM 3D Printer because they do not know what they need it for, how to run it, or how to service it. We get to know each customer and their business individually and help them understand how FDM 3D Printing can help their business. For example, when you buy a BFP-ICARUS unit, we schedule a two to three hour video chat with you on the day you receive it (Skype, FaceTime, etc). On that chat, we walk around the printer with you and go over its basic operations and how to maintain it. We really go the extra mile in terms of customer service and that is why our customer’s come back to use for future printers. Plus, as a fun “wow” moment for the customer, we laser etch their logo right next to ours on every machine that goes out the door. This gives our customer’s a personal touch that provides them confidence in their decision of partnering with Filament Innovations.

 How capable is it? 

The unit is extremely capable in terms of what it can do as the unit is enclosed, the Dyze PRO series hotend can go to 450C with ease, and the unit comes with all the bells and whistles you would want (auto bed leveling, independent Z motor bed leveling, WiFi, etc). The one unique selling points that really impresses our customers is its upgradability for the extrusion systems. Filament Innovations may have one of the best relationships in the history of FDM with Dyze Designs. We have made every BFP-ICARUS unit upgradable to accommodate Dyze’s 2.85mm high flow Typhoon system and the Pulsar pellet extrusion system. This means customers can buy one 3D Printer, and upgrade that one unit to a high-flow filament or pellet extrusion system once these systems come to market. For example, in the prosthetics industry, a below the knee socket is a large, relatively basic, but unique shape that needs to be printed quickly. Customers who choose to buy their BFP-ICARUS now can get their feet wet with 3D Printing and then buy the upgrade kits to retro-fit their 3D Printer as Dyze Designs releases these new systems. We designed our BFP-ICARUS platform with ballscrews for a reason, it can handle the additional weight of these extrusion systems out of the gate, which means customers do not need to buy an additional printer. This is just another example of how we are putting the customer’s needs first and not forcing them to buy an entirely new printer.   

The post Michael Gorski of Filament Innovations On FDM for Manufacturing appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Interview with Riddhi Maharaj on 3D Printing Space Systems in Africa

NewSpace Logo

Riddhi Maharaj is a Materials Engineer at NewSpace Systems. In this interview, we discuss 3D printing with respect to Space components design, product development and Lean engineering.

Can you give a brief introduction of NewSpace Systems?

NewSpace Systems (NSS) is an advanced satellite component manufacturer predominantly focused on the operational SmallSat constellation market. Making use of our 30 plus years of experience in the space industry, our team specializes in high-reliability Attitude Control Systems and services such as contract manufacturing and technology commercialization. To date, our team has worked with nearly 50 customers, across 5 continents, and has a UK subsidiary and 6 international partners/resellers. Additionally, the NewSpace manufacturing capability currently comprises of a unique state-of-the-art facility on the African continent, boasting several ISO 14644-1, class 7, certified cleanrooms and technicians who have been accredited to European Space Agency standards (ECSS), to effectively support our international clients and their demanding missions.

A chemical engineer by training, I obtained my B.Sc Honours in 2013 and an M.Sc in Chemical Engineering in 2016. Currently, I am pursuing an M.Phil in Space Studies, part-time, through the University of Cape Town. While my formal title at NewSpace Systems is that of Materials Engineer, on a day to day basis I’m involved in several R&D projects, one of which was aimed at the development of metal additive manufacturing high-frequency Radio Frequency (RF) components.

From your experience, how important is 3D printing and Additive Manufacturing in product development and Lean Engineering?

3D printing is a constantly developing technology that plays an important role in rapid product development and lean engineering due to the nature of the process. By allowing for rapid prototyping of parts additive manufacturing is a critical stage in lean engineering product development.

Printer pictures MH3

3D printing is a technique that builds objects layer by layer using materials such as polymers, metals, and composites, offering unparalleled manufacturing flexibility. 3D printing relies on CAD software to print products and in so doing drastically reduces the amount of supply chain management. Due to the additive nature of the process, it allows for the manufacture of very complex components with a substantial reduction in manufacturing time, costs and material wastage which are key objectives in the lean engineering approach.

Additionally, AM provides the users with the flexibility to create complex part geometries that are difficult to build using traditional manufacturing methods. Parts can now be manufactured with intricate internal cavities and lattice structures that help reduce parts’ weight without compromising their mechanical performance. Furthermore, AM machines produce less scrap than traditional machines and allow for recycling of the metal powder alloys further reducing material wastage.

One of the major advantages, which further cements the importance of 3D printing in product development and lean engineering, is that 3D printing allows for the fabrications of monolithic parts. In the space industry where mass is a premium,3D printing allows for lighter more efficient products that can also be produced faster. This is a major benefit in space product development given the growing demands of the industry for rapid product R&D and delivery.

What significant role has 3D printing and Additive manufacturing played in NewSpace Systems?

NewSpace Systems as a lean engineering company has increasingly started to utilize 3D printing in our product development in the last couple of years. It is typically used for rapid prototyping of new products during the product development phase to develop marketing ‘mock-ups’ of our products,  and to manufacture complex test and product assembly jigs, to ensure that our products meet our stringent quality standards.

Space Components

Apart from that, NSS is actively involved in the development of a new product line that utilizes laser metal 3D printing in titanium and aluminum to produce high-frequency RF and microwave products. High-frequency RF products are used extensively in satellite communication payloads. These systems are highly complex and are both difficult and expensive to manufacture using traditional methods which also produce very heavy systems. Due to the geometric freedoms offered by metal 3D printing, it allows for extremely light-weight and even more complex and highly efficient RF systems to be manufactured faster.  This led to NSS incubating a spin-out company, LambdaG.

LambdaG is a technology company specializing in the design and manufacturing of advanced RF & microwave components. Their primary focus areas are microwave components and innovative antenna systems in space, defense, and aerospace domains. Together with NewSpace Systems (Industry partner), they offer bespoke and custom 3D-printed waveguide components for small satellites. This additive manufacturing solution allows for unparalleled design flexibility. Their primary solutions are, but not limited to antenna systems for Telemetry, tracking and control, payloads, feed chains, diplexers and filters, passive waveguide components and custom sub-assemblies. LambdaG’s goal is to advance RF and microwave connectivity within the space, aerospace and defense domains with the aid of material science and advanced manufacturing. LambdaG is currently developing several requirement-driven RF & microwave products from L- to Ka-band as innovative solutions to the growing satellite communication needs.

Space equipment

Has 3D printing become a key technology in Materials Engineering?

I think 3D printing has become a key technology across a lot of engineering disciplines, not just materials engineering. Through my experience with metal 3D printed materials, I have noticed active R&D in the production of metal alloys and a growing area of interest being metamaterials.

 

The post Interview with Riddhi Maharaj on 3D Printing Space Systems in Africa appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Interview with Aaron Breuer, the CEO of SelfCAD

With perhaps only ten to twenty million people being proficient in CAD we can maintain that everyone could or should 3D print but the reality is that this isn’t in our hands. 3D modeling and CAD software let people design for 3D printing and if they are still too complex or take thousands of hours to master then the pool of available people that can really fully use 3D printing will always be limited. There are a number of easy 3D modeling tools out there that make the learning curve less steep and are entry-level alternatives that get you closer to making your ideas, faster one of these is SelfCAD. We know SelfCAD’s CEO Aaron Breuer well because he teaches the 3D modeling component of our 3D printing classes. We thought it high time that we interviewed him to find out more about SelfCAD.

What is SelfCAD? For who is it intended?

SelfCAD is an easy to use fully-featured online 3D modeling and slicing software. It enables users to model, sculpt and slice all under a single platform. SelfCAD is intended for Do It Yourself people and hobbyists. That is, those who design 3D models as a hobby and those own a 3D printer and design models for 3D printing.

Why should I get it?

The future of manufacturing is 3D printing and in the near future people will be able to design their own 3D models and 3D print them, and hence this is the right time for one to get into it.

What are some of its features?

SelfCAD is a fully functional CAD application because everything that one can do with professional CAD software can be done in SelfCAD too.

SelfCAD has several unique features that allow both novice and professional users to create simple and complex designs. For example, the Image generator that converts any type of Image into a 3D model. There is also the magic fix tool that automatically fixes your model to make it printable. SelfCAD also has an in-built slicer for slicing the model to prepare it for any FDM printer. Now we are working directly with other 3D printing companies in order to add more new interesting versions of 3D printing.

In addition to its unique tools, there are also standard CAD features like the technical drawing and sketching tools which are easier to use to enable users to explore their imagination and design abilities. There are also artistic features like the Sculpting tools that are easier to use.

How many people are working on SelfCAD?

20+.

Where do you hope to be in five years?

In a few years to come, we hope that most people with 3D printers will be using SelfCAD because they can design any type of 3D model and slice it too.

How do you make money?

SelfCAD is software as a service. We have a monthly and yearly subscription but we are far less expensive than our competitors.

How is SelfCAD optimized for 3D printing?

SelfCAD is an online program, hence users can share and collaborate on the cloud with others with ease. Secondly, everything created in SelfCAD is printable, whether it’s a model imported into SelfCAD or designed from scratch, the magic fix tool prepares the model for 3D printing.
There is also an in-built Slicer that generates the G-Code of the model after designing it without leaving the software. So from start to finish, one doesn’t need any additional software as one can design, customize and slice in a single program.

What does the education version include?

We give a 65% discount to the educators and it includes the same features as the paid version.

Why is it so easy to use?

SelfCAD has a simplified user-friendly interface that is simple to work with and one can master easily. It has also been designed in a way that the number of tools is less when compared to other programs, and these tools are reusable. That is, one can use the same tool to do different things. This is because SelfCAD was created by creative minds and brilliant UX designers who put a lot of emphasis on the usability of the program and hence they consolidated many similar tools.
There are also video tutorials and instructable guides that help the beginners to master SelfCAD in just a few days.
It has also been created in a way that makes it’s easy to work with basic shapes, unique designs, innovative concepts, and both simple and complex designs.

What’s it like competing with Autodesk and other huge companies?

Our main goal is not to compete with anyone, rather, we focus on providing a program for all people, both beginners, and professionals that will solve their design and slicing challenges. The users who have been struggling to create 3D models in other professional software can now get started easily in SelfCAD without taking months of designing. So generally our joy is to see people creating useful things and 3D printing them. Additionally, we are also working with schools directly to make 3D designing easy for them.

Who would you like to partner with?

We would like to partner with everyone, more so those who won’t our development resources. So far we have partnered with some 3D printing companies and schools and we look forward to more partnerships in the future.

Discuss this article and more on the 3DPrintBoard or comment below to tell us what you think.

The post Interview with Aaron Breuer, the CEO of SelfCAD appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Interview with Josh Martin the CEO of Fortify on Fiber Reinforced DLP

We’re so used to 3D printing being disruptive that we don’t, in my opinion, worry enough about being disrupted ourselves. Much 3D printing news is a seemingly endless me-too copycat conga line so we need to recognize when someone is doing something original. Fortify is doing something original, something original that is potentially disruptive to the 3D printing industry. The company has come out of obscurity to raise over $13 million for an integrated 3D printing solution for fiber-reinforced parts. Fortify is making strong DLP parts and can even align the fibers in these parts. Through correct fiber alignment inside a part, Fortify could potentially create properties that others could not match. Novel fibers could be used to make parts weakly magnetic but only in certain sections for example. Also tougher, stiffer and more durable DLP resin parts may take a traditionally smooth and detailed technology into new applications. Through better microstructural control the company could outperform other players by a significant margin. Boeing was already trying to put SLA parts on aircraft in the mid-nineties, will Fortify make that a reality? Or will light-cured resins always be brittle with low CSTs no matter how many fibers you put in them? Will their technology find broad adoption? Fortify has the potential to be truly disruptive if they through business development find, conquer and commercialize completely new parts and applications in spaces where their technology wins. Or the company could keep on seeking adoption and find only skepticism for a firm going its own way. Either way the company is going to have a very exciting number of years ahead of it. We interviewed Fortify CEO Josh Martin to find out more.

How did Fortify get started?

Fortify spun out of my research at Northeastern University. I completed my P.hD. under Professor Randall Erb at the DAPS (Directed Assembly of Particles and Suspensions) lab focusing on printing advanced composites. Throughout that process, I linked up with a few other engineers (Scott Goodrich, Andrew Caunter, and Dan Shores) at NEU and we decided to commercialize the technology. Around the same time,  Karlo Delos Reyes (one of Fortify’s Co-Founders) brought funding to the University for graduate students to turn their research and technology into a company (what is now called the Origin Program). We were lucky that the additive manufacturing space was gaining acknowledgement and needed new materials to continue serving a variety of industries. All of these pieces came together and propelled us to join MassChallenge (the largest accelerator for startups) where we were the 2016 Gold Winner. Since 2016, we’ve closed two rounds of Venture Capital financing, totaling $13M.

What is it that you do?

Fortify is creating engineering solutions by leveraging fiber reinforced additive manufacturing. We are commercializing DCM (Digital Composite Manufacturing), a platform that combines software, hardware, and materials for a fully integrated additive solution that will replace many bulk machined parts and enable new levels of performance through 3D printing.

How does it work?

The Digital Composite Manufacturing platform leverages traditional digital light projection technology to print accurate parts with high resolution. Our hardware system leverages new types of processing to print filled UV curable resins. Particle alignment and process control is driven by our software, which can utilize finite element analysis to optimize the end product.

How do you optimize for microstructural control?

Control over the microstructure is driven by our electromagnetic alignment technology – fluxprint. Optimization is reached by simulation based techniques, which allow us to use boundary conditions on a part to predict a best-case alignment protocol.

How do you align the fibers?

Our electromagnetic alignment technology – fluxprint – allows for control over the orientation of our reinforcing additives. Part of our unique value add is the ability to tailor the response of a number of different reinforcing materials.

So these are short fibers? 

In most cases, yes. Using aligned short fibers allows us to strike a unique balance of mechanical performance and processability.

Does this mean that you can also do magnetic parts?

Yes, this would be quite easy for us to accomplish. It’s worth mentioning that we currently tailor our materials so that the end-part has no bulk magnetic response.

How do your parts compare with traditional composites?

Traditional continuous fiber composites involve many labor intensive processes to achieve very high levels of performance. Applications that require large structural components (such as wind turbines and airplanes) will continue to leverage the traditional composite supply chain. However, for smaller and more complex parts, the cost to manufacture traditional composites often outweighs the performance benefit. Fortify is excited to bring our materials into these types of applications. Short fiber-filled engineering materials, such as glass-filled Ultem or PEEK, can be processed into more complex parts while providing valuable performance gains. However, these materials still present challenges that require machining operations and impose design constraints. Fortify is targeting a material performance-processability space that will directly compete with short-fiber filled engineering resins, and bridge the gap between filled engineering polymers and traditional composites.

Which materials can you do?

We are currently focusing our development on a number of ceramic reinforcements. We combine this with engineering thermosets from well known industrial suppliers like Henkel, DSM, and BASF.

Aren’t these DLP materials too brittle?

Thermoset materials used in DLP technologies have made tremendous progress towards improved toughness. Fortify is excited to improve performance measured by fracture and impact toughness using our alignment technology.

Can you produce parts with a lot of cross-sectional area?

Yes, Fortify is not limited to printing latticed parts. Most of our injection mold tools are printed with a fully dense cross-section.

Is it problematic that composites are difficult to recycle?

It has been a focus of the industry for a while now. There are new recyclable thermoset systems coming to the market, but the performance keeps them from competing with the incumbent supply chain. Fortify is keeping an eye on this space, because we believe our additive technology could be used to bridge the gap, enabling fiber reinforced recyclable systems that can compete on a performance basis with traditional materials.

What are some of the emerging applications?

Our beachhead application at the moment is injection mold tooling. This is an application sought after by the 3DP space for a few decades. The relatively low adoption barrier makes it a great entrance into the market to allow us to prove our technology as we develop for production parts. Fortify is excited to develop towards applications that need better performance at temperature, such as electrical connectors, as well as other industries that require precision parts with wear resistance, such as gears and electromechanical components.

Will you sell machines, be a service?

We are looking to provide hardware systems and consumables to OEM’s and contract manufacturers.

Who are you interested in partnering with?

We are actively seeking beta program partners. The perfect partner would be an organization that isn’t completely new to additive, so has some familiar background, and has an exciting application that fits the small, complex geometry, high mechanical application space. This is an exciting time to join the Fortify network as we continue to prove our technology for EUP and streamline production and manufacturing for composites in real world applications. 

What advice do you have for a company new to 3D printing that wants to use it for manufacturing?

Get the right decision makers involved from the beginning when identifying areas of the business that would benefit from the use of additive. Each use case likely has a bias towards a particular technology. Once that technology is identified, it will take dedicated resources to validate and exercise the use case.

The post Interview with Josh Martin the CEO of Fortify on Fiber Reinforced DLP appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.