Marine Biologist Modifies Bioprinting for the Creation of Bionic Coral

Corals are dying globally. In the face of climate change and global warming, we can expect some severe consequences, which in turn directly affects marine life. In what is panning out to be a mass extinction event, coral reefs have been dangerously threatened by toxic substances and excess carbon dioxide for years, causing the certain death of may of these diverse marine invertebrates. Once the coral is dead, the reefs will also die and erode, destroying important marine life, that would otherwise feed and spawn on it.

Considering that scientists have predicted that nearly all coral reefs will disappear in 20 years, it is crucial that we protect corals and learn from them. For the expanding field of biotechnology, untapped resources like corals hold great potential, as bioactive compounds for cancer research or simply as an inspiration for the production of bioenergy and bioproducts.

In an interview with 3DPrint.com, interdisciplinary marine biologist Daniel Wangpraseurt, from the University of California San Diego (UCSD)’s Department of NanoEngineering, explained how bioprinting technology was a pivotal point in his work to develop bionic 3D printed corals as a new tool for coral-inspired biomaterials that can be used in algal biotechnology, coral reef conservation and in coral-algal symbiosis research. 

“For many years I have been studying how corals optimize light management and discovered that there are lots of interesting evolutionary tricks, such as different growth forms and material properties, so I became interested in copying these strategies and developing artificial materials that could host living microalgae, just like corals do in nature,” revealed Wangpraseurt.

Daniel Wangpraseurt

As one of the most productive ecosystems globally, coral reefs use photosynthesis to convert carbon dioxide into energy that they in turn use for food. Even though light provides the energy that fuels reef productivity, key nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus are also required, but are found in very low quantities in warm tropical oceans where coral reefs are generally found, making scientists wonder how these marine animals have managed to create a competitive habitat with such limited resources.

A laser beam is intensely scattered by elastic coral tissue and aragonite skeleton. (Credit: Daniel Wangpraseurt)

Wangpraseurt described that, while different corals have developed a plethora of geometries to achieve such capabilities, they are all characterized by an animal tissue-hosting microalgae, built upon a calcium carbonate skeleton that serves as mechanical support and as a scattering medium to optimize light delivery toward otherwise shaded algal-containing tissues.

“Taking what we learned about corals and biomaterials, we began working on a project to develop a synthetic, symbiotic system using a 3D bioprinting approach. We know corals have both animal cells and algal cells, and, so far, we have mimicked the animal part of the corals, that is, the physical and chemical microhabitat that partially controls the activity of the algal cells.”

At UCSD, Wangpraseurt expects to continue recreating coral-inspired photosynthetic biomaterial structures using a new bioprinting technique and a customized 3D bioprinter capable of mimicking functional and structural traits of the coral-algal symbiosis. Along with fellow researchers from UCSD, the University of Cambridge, the University of Copenhagen and the University of Technology Sydney, and thanks to a grant from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the team reported the results of their work on bioinspired materials that was published in the journal Nature Communications earlier this year.

“We want to go further and not just develop similar physical microhabitat but also modulate cellular interactions, by mimicking biochemical pathways of symbiosis. We hope that this allows us to not only optimize photosynthesis and cell growth, but also to gain a deeper understanding of how the symbiosis works in nature. By doing so, we can improve our understanding of stress phenomena such as coral bleaching, which is largely responsible for global coral death.”

Living colonies of Symbiodinium are visible within the 3D bioprinted tissues (Credit: Daniel Wangpraseurt)

So, how did bioprinters become the go-to technology for this project? Wangpraseurt explains that, while working as a researcher at the University of Cambridge’s Department of Chemistry Bio-Inspired Photonics lab, he noticed that scientists were using cellulose as a biomaterial with interesting optical responses. He was wondering how he could use cellulose to develop a material with very defined architectural complexity. 

“In the beginning, the main aim was to develop a coral-inspired biomaterial, that has a similar optical response as natural coral, and then to grow algae on it or within it. Thereby, we started off with simple techniques, using conventional 3D printers; however, it wasn’t very easy to recreate the spatial resolution we needed for corals.”

Inspired by 3D bioprinting research in the medical sciences, Wangpraseurt reached out to scientists at the UCSD NanoEngineering lab that were developing artificial liver models, and who later became collaborators in the project.

A laser beam is intensely scattered by elastic coral tissue and aragonite skeleton (Credit: Daniel Wangpraseurt)

The team went on to develop a 3D printing platform that mimics morphological features of living coral tissue and the underlying skeleton with micron resolution, including their optical and mechanical properties. It uses a two-step continuous light projection-based approach for multilayer 3D bioprinting and the artificial coral tissue constructs are fabricated with a novel bioink solution, in which the symbiotic microalgae are mixed with a photopolymerizable gelatin-methacrylate (GelMA) hydrogel and cellulose-derived nanocrystals (CNC). Similarly, the artificial skeleton is 3D printed with a polyethylene glycol diacrylate-based polymer (PEGDA).

Close up of coral polyps and living photosynthetic biomaterials. Living colonies of Symbiodinium are visible within the 3D bioprinted tissues (Credit: Daniel Wangpraseurt)

Based in San Diego, Wangpraseurt has spent months trying to recreate the intricate structure of the corals with a distinguished symbiotic system that is known to grow as it creates one of the largest ecosystems on the planet. 

“We used a 3D bioprinter that had been developed for medical purposes, which we modulated and further developed a specific bioink for corals. A lot of the work was related to the optimization of the material properties to ensure cell viability. Having the right bioink for our algal strains was crucial as if we were to use mixtures commonly used for human cell cultures, the cells will not grow very well and can die rapidly.”

The implications of the newly developed 3D printed bionic corals capable of growing microalgae are many. Wangpraseurt said he plans to continue working on bionic corals and potentially scale up the process for his startup, called mantaz, as well as for commercial properties; or to develop coral-inspired materials at a larger scale to have a more immediate impact on efforts related to coral reef restoration, and also for biotechnology.

SEM images of the skeleton structure of the coral Stylophora pistillata and the coral-inspired, 3D-printed material (Credit: Daniel Wangpraseurt)

Wangpraseurt is looking to scale the bioprinting system to have a more immediate impact on algae biotechnology, bioenergy, and bioproducts. He claims that he and his colleagues can “customize the environment of the algae and fine-tune the production of a certain bioproduct to potentially tap into the algae bioproduct market and scale the system for bioenergy production.” 

“Another interest of mine is to further develop a 3D bioprinted synthetic coral-algal symbiosis system, which can provide important insight into the mechanisms that lead to coral death, but can also result in the development of future technology for coral reef restoration.”

The researcher talks about coral reefs with a reverent passion that today goes beyond his lab work. When he is not moving the research along at USCD, Wangpraseurt is working with his social enterprise in Panama, as he and his team try to restore coral reef ecosystems to help coastal communities in the tropics, including local fishermen, by harvesting algae biomass that can be sold for different purposes, such as natural fertilizer, which contributes to an organic and sustainable chain of production. Furthermore, the coral-inspired aspects of Wangpraseurt’s research and startup company are really coalescing to enable him and his team to understand how corals work and, in turn, how we can learn from them for the benefit of our planet.

Nutrient sampling at a polluted reef in Panama (Image: Daniel Wangpraseurt)

The post Marine Biologist Modifies Bioprinting for the Creation of Bionic Coral appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Fabricating Bionic Corals Could Improve Bioenergy and Coral Reefs

Replicating structures with live cells have the potential to create environments to study processes and cell development that could become very beneficial to scientists and one of Earth’s largest ecosystems, coral reefs. These structures are complex and interesting for researchers, most reef-building corals have a mutualistic relationship with the algae that live in their tissues. The coral provides the algae with a protected environment and compounds they need for photosynthesis and in return, the algae produce oxygen and supply the coral with glucose, glycerol, and amino acids, which are the products of photosynthesis. The coral uses these products to make proteins, fats, and carbohydrates, and produce calcium carbonate.

This intricate relationship between coral and algae, that began 160 million years ago, can enlighten researchers that seek to provide a source of bioenergy and bioproduct generation. Earlier this month, a group of researchers from the University of Cambridge and the University of California San Diego has developed bionic 3D printed corals as a new tool for coral inspired biomaterials that can find use in algal biotechnology, coral reef conservation and in coral-algal symbiosis research.

The coral-inspired photosynthetic biomaterial structures were fabricated using a rapid 3D bioprinting technique capable of mimicking functional and structural traits of the coral-algal symbiosis and their results were reported in the journal Nature Communications, opening a new door to bioinspired materials and their applications for coral conservation.

The first author of the paper and a Marie Curie Fellow from Cambridge’s Department of Chemistry, Daniel Wangpraseurt, indicated that “corals are highly efficient at collecting and using light, in our lab, we’re looking for methods to copy and mimic these strategies from nature for commercial applications.”

Wangpraseurt along with his colleagues have found a way to 3D print coral structures and use them as incubators for algae growth. They claim to have tested various types of microalgae and found that growth rates were one hundred times higher than in standard liquid growth mediums.

To create the intricate structures of natural corals, the researchers have developed a bioprinting platform capable of reproducing detailed structures that mimic the complex designs and functions of living tissues, like the photosynthetic matter mimicking coral tissue and skeleton source geometries. This method can print structures with micrometer-scale resolution in just minutes.

To scan living corals and use the models for their 3D printed designs, the team used an imaging technique that uses low-coherence light to capture micrometer-resolution called an optical coherence tomography (OCT), that is usually used for medical imaging and industrial nondestructive testing. The OCT data were imported into MATLAB and converted so that the images could be sliced into 2D image sequences for bioprinting.

The bioink for the hybrid living bionic coral constructs capable of cultivating high algal cell densities was made up of final concentrations of a green microalga; a combination of polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) with gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) to make a mechanically robust and tunable hydrogel; the photoinitiator lithium phenyl-trimethyl-benzoyl phosphinate (LAP); a food dye; cellulose-derived nanocrystals (CNC), and artificial seawater.

“We developed an artificial coral tissue and skeleton with a combination of polymer gels and hydrogels doped with cellulose nanomaterials to mimic the optical properties of living corals,” stated co-senior author Silvia Vignolini, also from Cambridge’s Department of Chemistry. “Cellulose is an abundant biopolymer; it is excellent at scattering light and we used it to optimise delivery of light into photosynthetic algae.”

The final bionic coral was designed in CAD software and was then sliced into hundreds of digital patterns with a custom-written MATLAB program. The digital patterns were uploaded to a digital micromirror device (DMD) in sequential order and used to selectively expose the prepolymer solution for continuous printing.

The custom-made 3D bioprinter uses light to print coral microscale structures in seconds. So that the printed coral copies natural coral structures and light-harvesting properties, create an artificial host-microenvironment for the living microalgae.

Chlorophyll fluorescence of bionic tentacles (Credit: Daniel Wangpraseurt)

Cambridge University suggested that the coral-inspired structures were highly efficient at redistributing light, just like natural corals, since only biocompatible materials were used to fabricate the 3D printed bionic corals.

This is critical for replicating structures with live cells, said co-senior author Shaochen Chen, also a professor from UC San Diego. “Most of these cells will die if we were to use traditional extrusion-based or inkjet processes because these methods take hours. It would be like keeping a fish out of the water; the cells that we work with won’t survive if kept too long out of their culture media. Our process is high throughput and offers really fast printing speeds, so it’s compatible with human cells, animal cells, and even algae cells in this case,” he went on.

The technique allows replication of any coral architecture, providing a variety of design solutions for augmenting light propagation. The team of researchers claims that their work “defines a class of bionic materials that is capable of interacting with living organisms and can be exploited for applied coral reef research and photobioreactor design.”

Wangpraseurt explained that “by copying the host microhabitat, we can also use our 3D bioprinted corals as a model system for the coral-algal symbiosis, which is urgently needed to understand the breakdown of the symbiosis during coral reef decline.”

Undoubtedly, the decline of coral reefs has been well documented and is a great concern to conservationists and should be a pressing matter for society at large. A 2017 study by UNESCO claims that the world’s coral reefs, from the Great Barrier Reef off Australia to Seychelles off East Africa, are in grave danger of dying out completely by mid-century unless carbon emissions are reduced enough to slow ocean warming.

As part of a growing concern to aid this fragile underwater ecosystem, Wangpraseurt, along with other colleagues has created a company, called mantaz, that uses coral-inspired light-harvesting approaches to cultivate algae for bioproducts in developing countries, as well as restore coral reefs with the help of local fishermen.

A colony of the coral Stylophora pistilla growing on Watakobi Reef, East Sulawesi, Indonesia (Credit: University of Cambridge)

“We hope that our technique will be scalable so it can have a real impact on the algal biosector and ultimately reduce greenhouse gas emissions that are responsible for coral reef death,”

The study, funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, as well as the European Research Council, the David Phillips Fellowship, the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, the Carlsberg Foundation, and the Villum Foundation, appears promising. By mimicking the coral’s light management strategies and designing a bionic coral made out of sustainable polymers for enhanced microalgal light absorption and growth, they were able to define a class of bionic materials that is capable of interacting with living organisms and can be exploited for coral reef research and energy production.

The post Fabricating Bionic Corals Could Improve Bioenergy and Coral Reefs appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

REGEMAT 3D Will Start Selling Biomaterials

One of the key players in the bioprinting field in Spain will be incorporating seven new biomaterials. In the coming months, REGEMAT 3D will launch a catalog of biomaterials that customers can buy and use along with their bioprinting systems. According to company officials, in recent years, advances in 3D bioprinting systems have become very important, as well as new biomaterials for regenerative medicine. The performance of the research groups with which they collaborate has produced results that were likely unheard of years ago. Still, they consider that these innovations in bioprinting systems must be accompanied by a progressive definition and characterization of the biomaterials being used. This year, one of REGEMAT 3D’s objective is to advance biomaterials for further research in the different applications derived from the 3D bioprinting sector, which is growing every year.

REGEMAT 3D bioprinting with new biomaterials

Each specific application requires different solutions and appropriate biomaterials to optimize processes. For instance, it is easy to understand that to regenerate skin components, hydrogels, cells and growth factors are different from those needed to regenerate muscle tissue, bone or cornea. So, it is essential to offer researchers and scientists different biomaterials to aid their work. REGEMAT is focusing on seven: thermoplastics, collagens, alginates, agaroses, gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), nanocellulose, and different types of cell media compatible with the cells used. All of the biomaterials should be easy to print, handle and will allow researchers to tackle some of the challenges they face while working. 

The new biomaterials for 3D bioprinting will be available on the company’s web page (which they will relaunch shortly), as well as through their offices. REGEMAT 3D has agreements with several national and international partners for the manufacture of these products. The first ones to be sold commercially will be nanocellulose, collagen, and alginate.

REGEMAT 3D new biomaterials

The Granada, Spain-based biotech company has sold its machines to users in more than 25 countries. For years, the company has been working with research groups at the University of Granada in advanced therapies, participated in a joint project for the development of new therapies for cartilage regeneration, and has collaborated with the University Hospital of La Paz, where REGEMAT 3D’s founder coordinates the 3D Tissue Engineering and Printing Platform (PITI3D), which provides ingredients and processes to generate functional tissues. Since its origin, the startup has been focusing on regenerative medicine, developing custom hardware and software required and demanded by some of the major hospitals and research universities in the region. They develop their own bioprinting systems – the BIO V1 machines – and customize them for their users’ applications according to the requirements of each investigation.

Last January, a group of researchers led by the University of Granada and REGEMAT 3D, published an academic article on the development of a volume-by-volume 3D biofabrication process that divides the printed part into different volumes and injects the cells after each volume has been printed, once the temperature of the printed thermoplastic fibers has decreased. This helps overcome problems that arise when working in 3D bioprinting with thermoplastics at high temperatures: one of the biomaterials they will soon begin commercializing, with which the company is very familiar and has worked with for a long time. 

To continue developing new biomaterials and launching new products, the Spanish company, led by founder and CEO José Manuel Baena, has managed to raise 320,000 Euros in the midst of the latest financing round. REGEMAT 3D, along with its sister company Breca, are not only launching the new series of biomaterials, but they are also expanding their presence to Brazil, where the company has already started to market its products, and China, where they closed an agreement with Chinese distributor ApgBio, based in Shanghai, that’s responsible for introducing bioprinting equipment in the country for the regeneration of organs or tissues. Companies like REGEMAT 3D are gearing up to mass produce biomaterials, providing researchers with more options when it comes to bioprinting for regenerative medicine and advanced therapies, usually keeping in mind how patients bodies will react to the new materials, and whether they will be compatible. Spain, like many other European countries, is quickly catching up to the world of bioprinting, which today is led by US-based companies but shows promise in many developed countries.

[Images: REGEMAT 3D]

The post REGEMAT 3D Will Start Selling Biomaterials appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

China: Complex GelMA-based Scaffolds Improved with the Addition of Nanoclay

Chinese scientists are delving further into successful bioprinting in ‘3D printing of complex GelMA-based scaffolds with nanoclay,’ exploring why photo-crosslinkable gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) has become so enticing for researchers attempting to engineer tissue. In a realm rife with obstacles, however, GelMA is no exception—constricted by viscosity issues and long cross-linking time.

The authors decided to bolster the ink further with nanoclay, in the hopes of being able to print stable, complex scaffolds. During this study, they evaluated windows for printability, issues with porosity and mechanical strength, and biocompatibility.

Obviously, without cell viability, there is no bioink and there are no spectacular innovations to write about. A wide range of hydrogels have been used successfully, with alginate commonly involved due to rapid crosslinking speed. Here, however, the researchers explain that alginate is not always conducive to attachment of cells or good function. Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA), however, is known to crosslink easily during light exposure. The researchers point out also that it maintains the biocompatibility of gelatin.

In attempting to overcome multiple issues with the use of GelMA, such as low viscosity and extensive time required for cross-linking, they examined the use of pre-crosslinking, post-crosslinking, in-situ crosslinking, and two-step crosslinking. Ultimately, the consensus was that all the methods were unsuitable, resulting in inferior stability. With the addition of nanoclay, however, the authors discovered that the ink had higher viscosity, and the GelMA scaffolds had better shape fidelity.

“After extrusion, the nanoclay rapidly converted to the gel state upon the release of shear stress, thereby forming stable hydrogel filament,” stated the authors. “Finally, the 3D structure was printed layer-by-layer by stacking the filament, and the GelMA within the filament was covalently crosslinked under UV light, resulting in a stable scaffold.”

3D printing strategy of complex scaffolds with GelMA/Nanoclay ink. (A) Schematic illustration of printing scaffolds with GelMA/Nanoclay ink: (I) preparing GelMA/Nanoclay ink, (II) extruding filament based on the thixotropy property of nanoclay, and (III) printing structure based on the photo-crosslinking of GelMA. (B) Rheological properties of the GelMA/Nanoclay ink: (I) flow
behavior of 4% nanoclay, 10% GelMA, 10/3% GelMA/Nanoclay, 10/4% GelMA/Nanoclay, and 10/6% GelMA/Nanoclay, (II) the viscosity-shear rate, and (III) the shear moduli-angular frequency of the respective biomaterial inks.

They also found that nanoclay at higher levels resulted in less expansion due to more shear stress, meaning that nanoclay with higher concentration needed greater yield stress for deformation. In further discussion, the authors states that greater balance needs to researched for printing with GelMA/Nanoclay, and that so far, they surmise that if ‘cell-laden structures’ are to be directly 3D printed, they are forced to give up shape fidelity. Along with that, greater control is required of the following:

  • Mechanical strength
  • Degradation rate
  • Tissue regeneration capacity

“Through systematic experiments that included rheological testing, printability analysis, property characterization, and biocompatibility characterization, we have answered several fundamental questions relating to this ink, including the formation mechanism for shear-thinning and rapid-gelling and the printability window for the fabrication of complex GelMA scaffolds, as well as showing that the addition of nanoclay improved the basic properties and had no effect on the excellent biological performance of the scaffolds,” concluded the researchers.

“Therefore, this method provides an easy way to fabricate complex GelMA-based scaffolds with good shape fidelity. It is very likely that this method will have versatile applications in the individualized therapy of tissue defects.”

Printability analysis of GelMA/Nanoclay ink with regard to the extrusion process. (A) Schematic illustration of the expansion phenomenon and definition α = D/d.(B) Effect of the nozzle diameter on (I) the extruded filament diameter, and (II) α.
(C) Effect of the flow rate on (I) the extruded filament diameter, and (II) α.

The world of tissue engineering and bioprinting is rich in a variety of scaffolds, and while here we have learned more about the use of GelMA-based scaffolds, researchers around the world are constantly experimenting with new ways to sustain cells and make inks that are cell-laden. We have followed studies regarding transparent bioinks for fabricating corneas, making neural tissue, and 3D printing complex structures like alginate/gelatin hydrogels. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

Photograph of the printed scaffolds with various shapes. (A) Abbreviation of Zhejiang University. (B) A bionic ear. (C)A branched vessel.

[Source / Images: ‘3D printing of complex GelMA-based scaffolds with nanoclay’]