Researchers Run Simulation Tests on Their 3D Printed CubeSat Before LEO Mission

A pair of researchers from Shantou University in China explored designing and manufacturing a CubeSat with 3D printing, which we have seen in the past. CubeSats, which are basically miniaturized satellites, offer plenty of advantages in space exploration, such as low cost, a short research cycle, and more lightweight construction, but conventional methods of manufacturing often negate these. Using 3D printing to make CubeSats can help achieve accurate details as well.

[Image: ESA]

The researchers, Zhiyong Chen and Nickolay Zosimovych, recently published a paper on their work titled “Mission Capability Assessment of 3D Printing Cubesats.”

“With the successful development of integrated technologies, many spacecraft subsystems have been continuously miniaturized, and CubeSats have gradually become the main executors of space science exploration missions,” they wrote.

The main task driving research paper is an LEO, or Low Earth Orbit, CubeSat mission, which would need to accelerate to a maximum of 5 g during launch.

“…the internal operating temperature range of the CubeSat is from 0 to 40 °C, external temperature from -80 to 100 °C,” the researchers explained.

During the design process, the duo took into account environmental factors, the received impact load during the launch process, and the surrounding environment once the CubeSat reached orbit. Once they determined the specific design parameters, ANSYS software was used to simulate, analyze, and verify the design’s feasibility.

PLA was used to make the mini satellite, which is obviously shaped like a cube. Each cube cell, called a unit, weighs approximately 1 kg, and has sides measuring 10 cm in length.

“The framework structure for a single CubeSat provides enough internal workspace for the hardware required to run the CubeSat. Although there are various CubeSat structure designs, several consistent design guidelines can be found by comparing these CubeSats,” the researchers wrote about the structure of their CubeSat.

These guidelines include:

  • a cube with a side length of 100 mm
  • 8.5 x 113.5 mm square columns placed at four parallel corners
  • usually made of aluminum for low cost, lightweight, easy machining

The CubeSat needs to be big enough to contain its power subsystem (secondary batteries and solar panels), in addition to the vitally important thermal subsystem, communication system for providing signal connections to ground stations back on Earth, ADCS, and CDH subsystems. It also consists of onboard antennae, radios, data circuit boards, a three-axis stability system, and autonomous navigation software.

“The adoption of this technology changes the concept of primary and secondary structure in the traditional design process, because the whole structure can be produced at the same time, which not only reduces the number of parts, reduces the need for screws and adhesion, but also improves the stability of the overall structure,” the pair wrote about using 3D printing to construct their CubeSat.

The mission overview for this 3D printed CubeSat explains that the device needs to complete performance tests on its camera payload for reliability evaluation, and test the effectiveness of any structures 3D printed “in an orbital environment.”

The Von mises stress diagram of the CubeSat structure.

In order to ensure that it’s ready to operate in LEO, the CubeSat’s structures was analyzed using ANSYS’ finite element analysis (FEA) software, and the researchers also performed a random vibration analysis, so that they can be certain it will hold up under the launch’s impact load.

“The CubeSat structure is validated by the numerical experiment. During launch process, CubeSat will be fixed inside the P-Pod, and the corresponding structural constraints should be added to the numerical model. In addition, the maximum acceleration impact during the launch process should also be considered. Static Structural module of ANSYS is used for calculation and analysis, the results show that the maximum stress of CubeSat Structure is 8.06 MPa, lower than the PLA yield strength of 40 Mpa,” the researchers explained.

Running in LEO, the 3D printed CubeSat will go through a 100°C temperature change, and the structure needs to be able to resist this, so the researchers also conducted a thermal shock test, which showed an acceptable thermal strain.

The thermal strain diagram of the CubeSat structure.

The team also conducted random vibration simulation experiments, so they could conform the structure of the 3D printed CubeSat to emission conditions. They simulated typical launch vibration characteristics, using NASA GEV qualification and acceptance as reference.

“The specific contents of the experiment include “Harmonic Response” and “Random Vibration”. Two identical harmonic response were performed before and after the random vibration test to assess the degree of structural degradation that may result from the launch load,” the researchers explained.

“This experiment helps us to evaluate the natural frequency of the structure, and the peak value indicates that the tested point (bottom panel) has reached the resonant frequency.”

Pre/Post Random Vibration test comparison between the curves of Harmonic Response.

As seen in the above figure, both the trend and peak points of the two curves are close to each other, which shows that there was no structural degradation after the vibration test, and that the structure itself conforms to launch stiffness specifications.

“As the primary performer of today’s space exploration missions, the CubeSat design considers orbit, payload, thermal balance, subsystem layout, and mission requirements. In this research, a CubeSat design for performing LEO tasks was proposed, including power budget, mass distribution, and ground testing, and the CubeSat structure for manufacturing was combined with 3D printing technology,” the researchers concluded.

“The results show that the CubeSat can withstand the launch loads without structural damage and can meet the launch stiffness specification.”

Discuss this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below. 

The post Researchers Run Simulation Tests on Their 3D Printed CubeSat Before LEO Mission appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

252 Replies to “Researchers Run Simulation Tests on Their 3D Printed CubeSat Before LEO Mission”

  1. Pingback: porn
  2. Pingback: child porn
  3. Pingback: bandarqq
  4. Pingback: cialis
  5. Pingback: buy followers
  6. Pingback: 918kiss mobile app
  7. Pingback: cialis generic
  8. Pingback: ed meds
  9. Pingback: ed pills otc
  10. Pingback: canada pharmacy
  11. Pingback: Buy cheap cialis
  12. Pingback: buy levitra
  13. Pingback: order vardenafil
  14. Pingback: 안전카지노
  15. Pingback: free slots online
  16. Pingback: viagra cheap
  17. Pingback: slot games
  18. Pingback: pay day loans
  19. Pingback: loan online
  20. Pingback: cash payday
  21. Pingback: viagra for sale
  22. Pingback: free slots
  23. Pingback: 20 cialis
  24. Pingback: 5 mg cialis
  25. Pingback: 20 cialis
  26. Pingback: generic for cialis
  27. Pingback: real money casino
  28. Pingback: best casino online
  29. Pingback: viagra pills
  30. Pingback: viagra discount
  31. Pingback: viagra 100mg
  32. Pingback: tadalafil 40 mg
  33. Pingback: cialistodo.com
  34. Pingback: ceclor generic
  35. Pingback: celebrex uk
  36. Pingback: cheap celexa 10mg
  37. Pingback: order cephalexin
  38. Pingback: cipro pills
  39. Pingback: claritin 10mg usa
  40. Pingback: online casino
  41. Pingback: online gambling
  42. Pingback: cheap ed pills
  43. Pingback: casinos online
  44. Pingback: slots online
  45. Pingback: aig car insurance
  46. Pingback: autoinsurance
  47. Pingback: generic cialis
  48. Pingback: cbd oil for sale
  49. Pingback: buy papers online
  50. Pingback: colchicine cost
  51. Pingback: cheap coreg 6,25mg
  52. Pingback: diamox 250 mg cost
  53. Pingback: differin pills
  54. Pingback: doxycycline usa
  55. Pingback: elavil 25mg usa
  56. Pingback: hyzaar generic
  57. Pingback: imodium canada
  58. Pingback: Full Report
  59. Pingback: imuran cost
  60. Pingback: indocin 25mg nz
  61. Pingback: cheapest lopid
  62. Pingback: cheap macrobid
  63. Pingback: meclizine pharmacy
  64. Pingback: plaquenil price
  65. Pingback: proscar 5mg uk
  66. Pingback: spiriva australia
  67. Pingback: thorazine prices
  68. Pingback: toprol 25mg cheap
  69. Pingback: tricor tablets
  70. Pingback: valtrex tablet
  71. Pingback: voltaren 50mg uk
  72. Pingback: zanaflex 2mg uk
  73. Pingback: zocor 5 mg tablet
  74. Pingback: zovirax pills
  75. Pingback: how to buy zyprexa
  76. Pingback: aripiprazole cheap
  77. Pingback: glimepiride tablet
  78. Pingback: loratadine nz
  79. Pingback: clindamycin uk
  80. Pingback: warfarin pharmacy
  81. Pingback: desmopressinmg nz
  82. Pingback: phenytoin price
  83. Pingback: tamsulosin tablets
  84. Pingback: buy cialis now
  85. Pingback: ezctxrwe
  86. Pingback: order isosorbide
  87. Pingback: comprar viagra
  88. Pingback: where can u buy
  89. Pingback: buy now

Comments are closed.