Stephanie Sharp of 3DQue on Automated Manufacturing With FDM Clusters

I’m a huge proponent of clustered manufacturing. I believe that for many manufacturing parts clusters of FDM printers are the most economical solution for tough durable parts. Especially for parts larger than around five centimeters, FDM is the option that would work best. If a wide variety of materials is needed then FDM would also be at a distinct advantage. Large FDM systems would also be an alternative if reliability is your main concern and material variety was less important. Open systems don’t lock you into a vendor and let you have the lowest cost and widest choice of materials also. But there is still a wide gap to bridge between the current generation desktop printers and manufacturing millions of parts at scale. Surprisingly little work has been done on automating prints in 3D print clusters. Generally, there hasn’t also been much truly innovative work done lately. 3DQue does have a new approach to automating 3D printing clusters. The Canadian startup 3D prints sideways and sells software and clusters that aim to lower costs and automate manufacturing. We interviewed CEO Stephanie Sharp to learn more about the company.

What is 3DQue?

3DQue is a technology company producing automated digital manufacturing systems for in-house, on-demand mass production of plastic parts. Traditional 3D printing is high-touch, limiting its scalability. Whenever a person gets directly involved in the print process — part removal, printer reset, job scheduling, and batch layout — lead times increase and unit costs skyrocket. This limits the application of in-house 3D printing to very low volume applications such as prototyping and emergency parts. Alternatives such as outsourcing to regions with low labour costs increase lead times, reduce cost savings, and increase complexity associated with outsourcing, global shipping, and bulk inventory handling and storage.

We build technology that addresses the frequently overlooked cost-traps of 3D printing. Our QPoD is a multi-printer unit that runs autonomously, eliminating the need for scheduling, batch layout, part removal, and printer reset.

3DQue technology allows companies to take control of production.

How did you get started?

Mateo was an avid 3D printer hobbyist running his own print lab for himself and some friends. Word quickly spread and he was overwhelmed with so many orders, he could not keep up. The manual tasks (removing parts, loading files, etc) were too time consuming and there was a lot of downtime as printers sat idle between prints waiting for Mateo to be at home and have the time to remove parts and restart the next print. He was determined to remove the manual tasks so that he could manage the printing remotely and print continuously without having to be physically present.

After extensive research and trial and error, he came up with the technology (a combination of hardware and software) where he was able to vary the adhesion of the print bed, allowing for high adhesion during printing and automatic release of the print without any need for scraping or preparing the print surface. He then flipped the printer on its side, so that the part would fall off cleanly, allowing the printer to start the next job right away.

After using the technology himself for a few years and conducting extensive research to refine the technology, Mateo decided to offer his technology to the marketplace and enlisted the help of his mentor (and later co-founder), Steph, to lead the business operations and sales.

Why should I work with you?

For print lab operators:

  • Reduce manual tasks by 60% – eliminate need for batch layout, scheduling, part removal, and printer reset. Focus time on increasing quality of parts.

  • Have ability to produce hundreds of functional prototypes without disrupting R&D production.

  • Have ability to produce emergency parts without sacrificing a batch – simply allocate production of emergency part to a printer.

For production engineers

  • Take control of production of jigs & fixtures by printing in-house.

  • Reduce lead time by producing jigs & fixtures on-demand.

  • Reduce lead time by eliminating lengthy process of creating tooling for injection moulding.

  • Reduce  inventory from tens of thousands of dollars to a few hundred with just-in-time inventory at same unit cost as injection molding.

There are a number of advantages:

Scalability

Each QPoD comes with a built-in 9-printer network driven by QSuite software. This frees operators from batch production and offers users the ability to scale production by adding additional QPoDs. With 3DQue’s unique MaaS (manufacturing as a service model), users only pay for the hours that they use the printer and are able to buy “bundles” of hours (like cell phones) at a reduced rate, offering cost scalability.

Digital Manufacturing

With networked 3D Printers, there is no incremental cost to switching production from one part to another.

Essentially, any printer on the network can produce any part at any time, enabling just-in-time manufacturing for many parts in parallel, eliminating the cost, complexity and handling associated with batch production.

This in turn eliminates the need for overstock, reducing surplus inventory, and simplifying inventory management, as parts are only produced as needed.

Space Savings

By eliminating the need for tooling and having production capabilities handled by a limited number of machines, QPoD is able to produce thousands of unique parts in a very compact space (100,000 small parts/yr in 12 sqft).

Shorten the Supply Chain

Orders for any plastic part can be produced on demand on-site, essentially moving the entire supply chain into the warehouse, reducing complicated logistics, bulk shipping and inventory management.

How does it work?

The core tech rests on our VAAPR + Lock System (Variable Adhesion, Automated Part Release + Lock). This technology, driven by QSuite software, varies part adhesion so that prints stay in place during printing and are automatically released once the part is complete.

One of the first things many notice with 3DQue printers is that they are positioned sideways; prints are built outwards from a vertical the print bed rather than the traditional bottom-up approach. Once parts are done, the VAAPR + Lock is released, and gravity takes over causing the parts to drop out of the print area into a bin, conveyor, or dissolvable support tank and the printer is clear to start the next print. The VAAPR lock technology works without consumables such as tapes, glues, or other adhesives, eliminating the need to clear the print bed between prints.

QSuite is the software that runs the printer network. It serves as a central point for interacting with the printers and handles things such as printer monitoring, job delegation, job scheduling, and remote control. Users are able to submit their print jobs to a central queue in QSuite, and jobs will automatically be dispatched to available printers with the necessary configuration, connected to the network.

What kind of customers are you looking for?

We are looking for manufacturers interested in reducing lead times and inventory of plastic parts by having the ability to mass produce plastic parts on-demand and in-house:

  1. COO – automation of 3D printing is the future of plastics manufacturing. It reduces inventory up to 90%, reduces lead times from months to hours, increases sustainability scores by moving manufacturing in-house and on-demand, and produces parts at a unit cost that is comparable to your current costs for mid-volume injection molded parts.

  1. Production engineers – reduce cost and lead times for production of jigs and fixtures.

  1. Mechanical engineers & print lab operators looking to:

    1. scale their current network of 3D printer;

    2. eliminate lead times from days to hours;

    3. increase throughput capacity (9 separate print surfaces in a single unit);

    4. reduce costs 40-60% for rapid prototyping;

    5. have the capacity to easily produce hundreds or thousands of functional prototypes; and

    6. spend more time on high value tasks such as print optimization by eliminating tedious manual tasks (e.g. scheduling printers, designing batch layouts, part removal, and printer reset).

  1. Manufacturers who want to reduce lead time, inventory, and costs associated with plastic parts. For example, companies requiring electronics enclosures for sensors and other components, for example alarms, monitoring systems, etc.

  1. Filament manufacturers looking for hardware optimized to handle high volumes of their proprietary materials and automated part production to simplify the collection of hundreds or thousands of data points for developing new material formulations.

Do you save me money?

Yes. Field testing with a variety of end-users indicates that QPoD produces 3D prints at 30 – 50% less than traditional 3D printing and resulting in costs that are competitive with injection moulding in quantities ranging from 10,000-100,000 parts/yr.

QPoD

Traditional 3D Printer

Hardware + Labour

$1.12/APH*

$2.25 – 4.70/print-hour

Manual scheduling

none

yes

Batch layout

none

yes

*APH = Autonomous Print Hours ($0.79 with pre-purchase of APH)

Why sideways? And like everything works still then?

By printing sideways, the VAAPR + Lock mechanism takes advantage of gravity to clear parts from the print area. This means that we don’t have to introduce any additional moving parts eliminating potential points of failure.

The adhesion provided by VAAPR Lock is strong enough to support parts that fill the entire print surface area. The prints themselves are largely unaffected by printing sideways; for the vast majority of parts, the difference is impossible to tell. In some cases it can even be helpful as overhangs and bridges are no longer competing against gravity.

Whats a QPoD? What can it make? At what cost and yield? And how much does one cost?

QPod is a network of 9 printers that can make the same plastic parts as any other FDM-style 3D printer – plastic jigs, fixtures, electronic enclosures, etc.

Yield: 100,000 small parts/ year

Installation Cost:  $45,000 ($0.12/APH over 5 years)

Production Cost: $1.12/APH (or $0.79 with pre-purchase of APH bundles)

With what materials does it work?

Everything we have tested to date works with the VAAPR + Lock System: PLA, ABS, TPU, PETG, Nylon, PVA and testing for more materials is on-going.

How has it been designed?

QSuite and VAAPR Lock have been designed been designed with agility in mind. The manufacturing industry is entering a period of unprecedented change and the ability to quickly adapt will become a key competitive advantage.

As 3D printing moves production from batch to continuous production, inventory from bulk to just-in-time, and supply chains from outsourcing to inhouse. In 2019 the range of functional materials available for 3D printing more than doubled. The most competitive organizations will be the ones with the agility to take advantage of this rapid change. Recognizing this, we have designed the system for maximum flexibility ensuring that our clients will be able to quickly and easily adapt to market changes.

QPoD’s open architecture allows it to be easily customized to suit customer needs. Configuration options include dry boxes, dual extrusion, larger filament reels, etc.

Is it made in house?

Yes, the printers are all built at our facility in Vancouver, Canada.

Using the best components to meet the client’s needs, we assemble and test each printing unit and frame prior to shipping. Our product team then installs, calibrates and tests the equipment onsite to ensure it is functioning up to client expectations.

And do I need the QSuite?

Yes. QSuite runs the VAAPR Lock System and provides the operator-free functionality. It drives the fundamental job scheduling and delegation for printers on the network.

Can I use one without the other?

If you are a printer OEM, you can license the QSuite system and build it into your hardware.

What do you hope to achieve?

We want to see the world move towards a more sustainable, efficient and innovative form of manufacturing.

Imagine how much CO2 is created by shipping billions of tons of plastic parts around the world and then having to store them in bulk warehouses, handling the product multiple times, consuming energy for vehicles and forklifts, light, heat, humidity, and air conditioning. Imagine how much waste is produced by ordering thousands of parts to get a low unit cost and throwing out half due to obsolescence or simply lack of demand.

Now imagine in addition to reducing your environmental footprint, how much money, time and materials you would save by producing just the parts you need, where you need them (in your warehouse or production facility), when you need them.

Finally, imagine much you could reduce lead time and accelerate innovation by eliminating the following steps:

  1. Design for Manufacturing (DfM – the process of redesigning parts to make them suitable for manufacturing)

  2. Mould design and production

  3. Tooling setup and clean up

  4. Bulk shipping, handling, and warehousing

These steps can add 6, 12 or even 18 months to the part production process. By the time parts are made, the world has changed and the order is obsolete, sending companies back to the drawing board. With QPoD, part design can literally be changed during production – from one part to the next.

For what customers are you making this? What applications?

Mitsubishi Chemical Performance Polymers (MCPP) is using it in their R&D lab for new materials development.

The University of Illinois, Gies College of Business for their print lab. They are the only business school in the world to offer their students hands-on experience with this new production method.

We are also working with a global plastic parts supplier to create a smart factory to transfer mid-volume injection molding operations to an on-demand 3D printing process.

Because of the open architecture type of design for our QPoD, it is easily customizable and able to be used in a variety of applications from materials testing, to mass production of parts. This is great for materials testing as it accelerates the testing process by removing the need for batch processing and reducing downtime as the printers no longer sit idle waiting for operators to be available for part removal and printer reset. This can be applied to a variety of industries.

The post Stephanie Sharp of 3DQue on Automated Manufacturing With FDM Clusters appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

RAPID 2019: Talking 3D Printing and Partnerships with Ultimaker’s Jamie Howard

While attending the recent RAPID + TCT conference and trade show, I also visited the Ultimaker booth to meet with Jamie Howard, the new president of Ultimaker North America. On the first full day of RAPID, when the show floor had officially opened and there were just a few less lectures and workshops, the company announced that Heineken is using its on-demand 3D printing solutions to create functional machine parts and custom tools for the manufacturing line at its Seville brewery in Spain.

“We’re still in the first stages of 3D printing, but we’ve already seen a reduction of costs in the applications that we found by 70-90% and also a decrease of delivery time of these applications of 70-90%. Local manufacturing helps us a lot in increasing uptime, efficiency and output. We use 3D printing to optimize the manufacturing line, create maintenance and quality control tools, and create tools for our machines which help us increase safety for our people. I think there will be even more purposes in the future,” Isabelle Haenen, Global Supply Chain Procurement at Heineken, said in a press release.

Howard told me that he would describe Heineken as a “global customer,” and that Ultimaker was already looking at additional 3D printing applications in the brewery, aside from the ones it’s already working on, like safety and line optimizations and tooling.

The brewery produces multiple brands of beers owned by Heineken, which all adds up to 500 million liters of beer annually. Engineers at the Seville brewery started off using the Ultimaker 2+ about a year ago, but have since switched to a set of Ultimaker S5 machines.

Howard explained that the project partnership with Heineken included the Ultimaker applications engineering team going through the plant to help the brewery “discover and develop applications that could be 3D printed.”

Heineken’s 3D LAB [Image: Ultimaker]

“We offer that to our Enterprise customers as a service to help them accelerate the adoption of 3D printing in the enterprise,” Howard said. “We also facilitated some advanced training in design for 3D printing so that they could actually print the parts and tools we discovered during what we call the ‘site scan’ process, and that enables the transfer of knowledge and the adoption of knowledge necessary to have them be able to do it more on their own.

“So teaching the competency to discover new applications – it expands the catalogue of parts and applications that they can actually 3D print, which increases the adoption and expands the footprint of the printers.”

Since adopting Ultimaker’s solutions, the brewery has been able to increase its production uptime and save about 80% in production costs.

“The Heineken opportunity is really a good demonstration of the range of applications you can use the Ultimaker platform to do,” Howard said. “Our vision and mission is accelerating the world’s transition to local digital manufacturing, and in a distributed way, where you have the opportunity to leverage our software.

“The open materials platform gives us the flexibility to, at a local level, expand the range of applications with all the same accessibility to the material partners that we have through our Partner Alliance. The Heineken use case includes four categories of applications, from rapid prototyping to safety devices and also jigs, fixtures and tools on the manufacturing line, and also tooling for end-use parts – parts that fail during the production line process – to keep the uptime of the facility higher.”

I asked Howard what types of materials Heineken was using, and he showed me a device made out of Tough PLA material that is used to keep bottles from falling off the line.

“It’s light, and yet has the strength to be able to handle the weight from the bottle,” Howard explained.

“The tool that they were using before was a lot more rigid and rough, and it was sometimes causing the bottles to come off the line.”

The 3D printed version of the tool causes less friction on the bottles, which means a higher yield for Heineken as less bottles are breaking. It also saves the brewery time and money, as they can fabricate the tool on-site rather than send the design away to a third party for manufacturing. Howard also told me about one of the 3D printed safety device that’s been implemented in the brewery.

“There was a piece of equipment that required maintenance, and there was a safety latch that they built to prevent the machine from accidentally coming on during the maintenance process, to protect the workers from any injury. So the part that was printed goes over the power [switch] so you can’t inadvertently turn that machine on during the maintenance process.”



We then moved on to some parts 3D printed by other Ultimaker customers, including one for Volkswagen Autoeuropa. The tool, pictured above, was used on the manufacturing line to keep the wheel assembly from getting scratched. The tool has multiple drill guides to keep the wheel from falling off the lug nuts while it’s being screwed on, and Volkswagen was able to save a lot of time and money in upgrading to this 3D printed tool from the one they were previously using from a molding company, which would often break.

“We redesigned it…before, they were molding it in one piece. Our engineers helped them to discover that if they designed this differently, they could do it in a way that, if this part breaks, then you can just print that part, you don’t have to take the whole thing and throw it away,” Howard explained.

“All the principles of lean manufacturing are addressed in this particular piece.”

This new 3D printed version of the part reduces the amount of the time the tool was unavailable due to breakage, keeps productivity up, and also protects the wheel, so that the yield of the assembly at the end of the line is higher overall.

Take a look at more of my pictures from the Ultimaker booth at RAPID + TCT below:



Discuss this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts in the Facebook comments below.

[Images: Sarah Saunders, unless otherwise noted]

3D Printing News Briefs: September 22, 2018

In today’s 3D Printing News Briefs, we’ve got the speaker lineup for next month’s NAMIC Global Additive Manufacturing Summit in Singapore. Prusa and Cincinnati Incorporated are both releasing new 3D printing materials, and 3D Center is collaborating with 3YOURMIND to launch a 3D printing platform for the Scandinavian market. A British car manufacturer turns to Stratasys 3D printing for prototyping purposes, and a student used reverse engineering and 3D printing to redesign a Nintendo 64 joystick system.

2018 NAMIC Global Additive Manufacturing Summit Speakers

On October 17th and 18th, the 2018 Global Additive Manufacturing Summit, conducted by Singapore’s National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Cluster (NAMIC), will be held, and co-located as part of Industrial Transformation ASIA-PACIFIC. Hosted by NTUitive, the summit, which is said to be the country’s largest gathering of additive manufacturing experts, will highlight key AM opportunities and developments in multiple applications, such as aerospace, automotive, biomedical, building and construction, marine, and transportation.

This is the last week to purchase your ticket at the early bird rates. After seeing the line-up of speakers coming to the event, this is an event you definitely won’t want to miss. Some of the speakers include Dr. Behrang Poorganji, the Head of Materials Development for GE Additive: Apis Cor’s Anna Cheniuntai, R&D and Business Development; Kelvin Wee, the APAC Sales Director for Materialise; and Professor Paul C. Ho, with the Department of Pharmacy at the National University of Singapore. You can register for the 2018 NAMIC Global Additive Manufacturing Summit here.

Prusa Releasing In-House 3D Printing Filament

Fresh off the multi-material upgrade for its Prusa i3 MK3/MK2.5, Prusa has more good news – this week, the company released its new filament, Prusament, which is made entirely in-house. CEO and Founder, Josef Průša, said that the company was not happy with the over-exaggerated quality and specs that “most filament companies claim but don’t deliver,” which continued to cause its users to have issues poor print quality and jams.

“So we built a factory and just started to sell our own filament,” Průša told 3DPrint.com. “It took us over a year but we have something pretty special. We guarantee 20µm precision and every spool is traceable on our website, where you can see the full inspection report. I believe we are the only one to do this and hope to set a precedent.”

Check out the sample spool of Prusament for yourself – you’ll see that Prusa isn’t messing around.

Cincinnati Incorporated Launches New Carbon Fiber Material

Cincinnati Incorporated has developed a new material for its SAAM that is ideal for custom tooling and fixture applications. The carbon fiber resin creates a high strength-to-weight ratio and superior surface finishes.

Another company with a new 3D printing material launch this week is Cincinnati Incorporated (CI) – it just released a new carbon fiber resin material for its SAAM (Small Area Additive Manufacturing) 3D printing system. Because it’s been reinforced with carbon fiber, the lightweight, impact-resistant material is durable, stiff, and has low warping, along with accurate parts featuring advanced inter-layer adhesion results. It also has excellent surface finish, making it a good choice for applications in assembly, CMM, CNC fixtures, custom tooling, and has a very high strength-to-weight ratio.

 

 

 

Morgan Motor Company Turns to Stratasys 3D Printing for Prototyping

Family-owned British motor car manufacturer Morgan Motor Company is no stranger to 3D printing, and recently turned to the technology again for help with prototyping on the factory floor. In order to get rid of the endless talks with suppliers and lower the time to market, the company, which manufactures roughly 1,000 vehicles per year, invested in a Stratasys Fortus 250mc from Tri-Tech 3D, a Stratasys reseller in the UK.

“Since the introduction of 3D printing, using the Stratasys Fortus 250mc, Morgan have been able to try more daring designs within research and development,” said Tom Morris, a CAD technician with Morgan Motor Company. “It’s given us the opportunity to take these designs, trial them early on, giving us physical samples, which essentially cuts out the whole quoting process of liaising with suppliers, delivering these parts back to Morgan. Morgan are a low volume vehicle manufacturer, so the ability to be able to design parts on CAD, 3D print them, and take them to the shop floor at a very quick rate is vital to our success as a business.”

Watch the video below to learn more:

Fixing Nintendo 64 Joystick with Reverse Engineering and 3D Printing

California Polytechnic (Cal Poly) student and retro video gaming fan Nam Le was tired of having to find replacement controller joysticks for Nintendo 64 systems – a common problem many Nintendo fans have dealt with. So he took matters into his own hands, and contacted 3D Hubs for help fixing the problem. Le ended up reverse engineering the nearly 20-year-old components, 3D printing them, and redesigning the entire joystick system. It took him three months to disassemble the original controller, measure the components, and design them in CAD – a very impressive task, as he’d only ever taken a basic 3D modeling introduction class.

He determined that the joystick’s whole assembly would wear down over time, causing part failure, and designed the new components so that they were very sturdy and easy to replace. Le 3D printed the gear teeth and housing with Visijet M3 Crystal material, and 3D Hubs manufactured his redesigned joystick out of Nylon PA12 material on an HP Multi Jet Fusion 3D printer.

“Generally, harder materials won’t be worn by materials of a lower hardness,” Le explained about his material choice. “The result is having only one part wear compared to every old component wearing. Every once in a while the stick will have to be replaced, but it takes a longer time to wear and is a better cheap alternative than buying a new controller.”

Six months in, Le’s 3D printed prototype joystick controller shows no signs of breaking.

Discuss these stories and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts in the Facebook comments below. 

3D Printing News Briefs: June 26, 2018

We have plenty of business, material, and 3D printer news to share with you in today’s 3D Printing News Briefs. 3D printing led to increased savings for GM over the last two years, which is now increasing its use of the technology as a result. ExOne is saying goodbye to one CEO and hello to another, while Polymaker announces a global distribution arrangement with Nexeo Solutions and CollPlant receives R&D project approval in Israel. The US Patent and Trademark Office will be hosting its annual Additive Manufacturing Partnership Meeting this week, and RP Platform has announced a rebrand and a new AI software platform. Finally, the UK’s National Centre for Additive Manufacturing has decided to add Digital Metal’s binder jetting technology to its portfolio.

GM Increasing Use of 3D Printing at Plants

Zane Meike, AM lead at GM’s Lansing Delta Township assembly plant, holds a common 3D printed tool used to align engine and transmission vehicle identification numbers. [Photo: Michael Wayland]

According to Dan Grieshaber, the Director of Global Manufacturing Integration for General Motors (GM), most of the company’s factories have 3D printers, which are used to build accessories and tools for workers. A $35,000 3D printer at GM’s Lansing Delta Township assembly plant has actually helped save the company over $300,000 over two years: it’s used to make multiple items, such as part hangers, socket covers, and ergonomic and safety tools. A common tool used to align engine and transmission vehicle identification numbers cost $3,000 to buy from a third party, but is less than $3 to 3D print at the factory. Realizing that these kinds of savings can add up quickly, GM is increasing the use of 3D printing – part of its new Manufacturing 4.0 processes – at its plants in order to help streamline operations.

“We’re quickly evolving, creating real value for the plant. This will become, as we progress, our footprint. We’ll have this in every one of our sites,” Grieshaber said.

Grieshaber also said that GM is working to standardize 3D printing, as well as share best practices across all of its global plants.

ExOne Welcomes New CEO

The ExOne Company, which provides 3D printers and 3D printed products, materials, and services to its industrial customers around the world, has announced that its CEO, James L. McCarley, is departing the company, effective immediately, to pursue other interests and opportunities; he will be assisting the company in transitioning his responsibilities to the new CEO. ExOne’s Board of Directors has also announced who the new CEO will be – S. Kent Rockwell, the company’s Executive Chairman, who has served in the position in previous years. Rockwell’s new title is effective immediately.

“On behalf of our Board and management team, I would like to thank Jim for his efforts and wish him all the best in his future endeavors,” said Rockwell.

Polymaker Makes Distribution Arrangement with Nexeo Solutions

Shanghai-based 3D printing material producer Polymaker has entered an arrangement with chemicals and plastics distributor Nexeo Solutions, Inc., also based in Shanghai. Nexeo will be a global distributor for three new materials in the Polymaker Industrial line, but plans to introduce more of its materials over the rest of the year. C515 is an advanced polycarbonate (PC) filament that has excellent toughness and a low warping effect, while C515FR is a flame retardant PC with high impact resistance. SU301 is a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-based polymer that’s water soluble and was developed as a support material for FFF 3D printers.

Paul Tayler, the Vice President of EMEA at Nexeo Solutions, said, “Expanding our portfolio to include industrial grade filaments from Polymaker Industrial gives our customers access to a wider range of filaments that solve new 3D printing challenges and meet the demands of manufacturers. Industrial customers benefit from Nexeo Solutions’ access to world leading plastic producers coupled with additive manufacturing technical expertise.”

CollPlant Receives R&D Project Approval

Two years ago, regenerative medicine company CollPlant received funding from Israel’s Ministry of Economy for its research in developing collagen-based bioinks for 3D printing tissues and organs. CollPlant, which uses its proprietary plant-based rhCollagen (recombinant human collagen) technology for tissue repair products, has now announced that the Israel Innovation Authority (IIA) has approved a grant to finance the continued development of its rhCollagen-based formulations intended for use as bioinks. Terms of the grant require CollPlant to pay royalties to the IIA on future sales of any technology that’s developed with the use of the funding, up to the full grant amount. The total project budget is roughly $1.2 million (NIS 4.2 million), and the IIA will finance 30%, subject to certain conditions.

“In addition to providing immediate non-dilutive funding, this grant from the Israel Innovation Authority represents an important validation of our BioInk technology and its market potential. With the recent opening of our new cGMP production facility in Rehovot, Israel, we are well positioned to meet growing demand for our BioInk and tissue repair products. We are grateful to the IIA for this recognition,” said CollPlant CEO Yehiel Tal.

Additive Manufacturing Partnership Meeting Hosted by US Patent and Trademark Office

For the last several years, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has been hosting the Additive Manufacturing Partnership Meeting, and this year’s meeting takes place tomorrow, June 27th, from 1 to 5 PM at the USPTO headquarters inside the Madison Building in Alexandria, Virginia. The USPTO will be seeking opinions from various participants at the informal meeting, which is really a forum for individual 3D printing users and the USPTO to share ideas, insights, and personal experiences.

“We value our customers and the feedback provided from individual participants is important in our efforts to continuously improve the quality of our products and services,” the USPTO meeting site reads. “Your willing participation in this informal process is helpful in providing us with new insights and perspectives.”

Scheduled speakers at this year’s meeting are coming from CIMP-3D, HRL, Kansas State University, Lawrence Livermore Laboratories, and the NextManufacturing Center, and an RSVP is required to attend the AM Partnership Meeting.

RP Platform Launches New AI Software and Rebrand

London-based RP Platform, which provides customizable workflow automation software for industrial 3D printing, is launching a new software platform, which will use AI for the first time to automate 3D printing production. With customers in over 30 countries, the company is one of the top automation software providers for industrial 3D printing. In addition to its software launch, RP Platform has also announced that, as it continues to expand its software capabilities to target AM end part production, it is rebranding, and has changed its name to AMFG.

“We want to help companies make their 3D printing processes much smoother so that they can produce more parts with greater visibility and less effort. And we have more exciting releases to our software over the coming months that will further enhance our production automation capabilities,” said Keyvan Karimi, the CEO of AMFG.

“Ultimately, we’re creating a truly autonomous manufacturing process for industrial 3D printing. For us, this means taking manufacturing to a new era of production. The launch of our new software, as well as our company rebrand, fully reflects this vision going forward.”

NCAM Installing a Digital Metal 3D Printer

The National Centre for Additive Manufacturing (NCAM) in the UK, headquartered at the Manufacturing Technology Centre (MTC) in Coventry, has decided to add the unique binder jetting technology developed by Digital Metal to its large range of advanced manufacturing equipment, and will soon be installing one of its high-precision metal 3D printers – which are not available anywhere else in the UK. The 3D printer will be available for use by NCAM’s member companies, and other organizations, who are interested in testing the capabilities of Digital Metal’s proprietary binder jetting technology.

Dr. David Brackett, AM Technology Manager at the NCAM, explained, “The Digital Metal binder jetting technology falls into the category of ‘bind-and-sinter AM’, where a multi-stage process chain incorporating sintering is required to achieve full density. It’s a very fast technology that can create complicated and highly detailed designs, and there is potential for wider material choice than with AM processes that use melting. We are delighted to be able to offer this to the companies we work with.”

The Digital Metal 3D printer will be operational later this summer, and NCAM personnel are already training with it to ensure they can operate it efficiently and safely.

Discuss all of these stories, and other 3D printing topics, at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts in the Facebook comments below.