3D Printing and Virtual Surgery Help Repair Damage to Patient’s Face

3D printed surgical guides and virtual surgical planning (VSP) have been used in many types of procedures, such as knee replacement, spinal surgery, and reconstruction of chest walls and faces. But when it comes to reconstructing complex maxillofacial deformities, this kind of computer-aided technology is used far more often for bony reconstruction than for soft tissue. A team of researchers from the University of Michigan published a paper, “Using a 3D Printed “Phantom of the Opera” Soft Tissue Surgical Guide for Complex Facial Reconstruction,” about their work utilizing VSP and 3D printed guides to help a patient suffering complex soft tissue damage from a gunshot wound.

“In ballistic injuries there is often disfiguring damage to the soft tissue, with destruction of anatomic landmarks making satisfactory soft tissue reconstruction a unique challenge,” the abstract states. “By combining tangible surgical models and aesthetic judgment in a team setting, it is possible to optimize the efficiency and accuracy of soft tissue reconstruction in the setting of complex facial deformities.”

Ballistic facial injuries are extremely challenging to reconstruct, as both bony and soft tissue are damaged, and often there are tissue burns and contamination as well. For their study, the researchers presented a case that integrated VSP, 3D printed surgical guides, and anaplastology—a branch of medicine dealing with the prosthetic rehabilitation of an absent, disfigured, or malformed anatomically critical location of the face or body—to provide a 19-year-old female patient with “improved facial symmetry and orbital prosthesis accommodation.”

Preoperative photograph of a 19-year-old female with history of facial injury, status post debridement, ORIF of facial fractures, left globe enucleation. Arrows indicate antro-cutaneous fistulas.

Initially, the patient went to another facility, presenting with major facial injuries such as left globe rupture and fractures of the bilateral orbits, zygomas, maxilla, nasal bones, and septum. While there, she received a tracheostomy and “multiple facial washouts,” had her fractures fixed, and her left eye enucleated. Unfortunately, she later developed painful “antro-cutaneous fistulas at the bilateral malar regions” and was transferred to the U Mich facility for further reconstructive surgery.

The team used a “free tissue transfer” to reconstruct all of the patient’s facial wounds, which would close the fistula and help reconstitute her soft tissue. While this helped with her pain, it unfortunately made the left side of her face heavier, which, when paired with gravity, caused major asymmetry. So they moved on from wound control to “restoring her facial contours” and getting her an orbital prosthesis.

Patient after latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap reconstruction, with significant facial asymmetry.

They paired VSP mirroring technology with the dimensions of the proposed prosthesis to 3D print custom surgical guides to facilitate “precise debulking and resuspension of the left malar soft tissue and peri-orbita.” The researchers used Materialise Mimics to isolate the relevant bony and soft tissue anatomy, and then imported the image into 3Matic to create a clear model. Qualitative metrics and quantitative measurement were used to find “a sagittal plane of symmetry,” over which the unaffected part of the patient’s face was mirrored onto the left side.

“The shape of the resulting left orbital sphere was edited to the specific dimensions of the prototype orbital prosthesis provided by our anaplastologist,” they wrote.

Illustration of mirroring technique to achieve facial symmetry and creation of ideal left orbit utilizing data from the patient’s unaffected side and specifications of the planned orbital prosthesis. (Materialise Mimics Innovation Suite; Belgium).

The patient approved the virtual images for her planned reconstruction, and a custom guide was 3D printed for the “left orbital debulking portion of the surgery,” and another was made for the “left malar recontouring and suspension surgery.” If you’re familiar with “The Phantom of the Opera” musical, this second 3D printed surgical guide resembles the mask that the Phantom himself wears.

“In order to maximize use of the guides intraoperatively, 2 posts were added to the external surface of the orbital guide, and 2 matching slots were created on the internal surface of the malar mask. This allowed for implantation of the guides separately or in conjunction depending on intraoperative need,” the researchers explained. “Square cells were also cut from the malar mask to create a lattice that would allow the surgeons to visualize the patient’s face when the guide was in place.”

The guides were printed out of biocompatible Dental SG resin on a Form 2. I’ll leave out all of the surgical details, but suffice it to say the procedures were all successful, and eight months later, the patient showed major improvements “in the symmetry of her midface and periorbital regions.”

“Although we have only presented 1 patient with limited follow up, this case demonstrates a new application of computer aided technology and adds to the armamentarium of the maxillofacial surgeon,” they wrote.

3D printed models of the surgical guides for left orbit and cheek. The guides were modified to be interlocking. The malar mask had a lattice structure that allowed for better visualization of underlying structures.

While things worked out here, there are still challenges in using computer aided technology to reconstruct soft tissue, such as “the natural irregularity” in a human face and the fact that soft tissue is very sensitive to inflammation, as well as dynamic, meaning it can’t be totally immobilized.

“As such, deformational forces and involuntary activation of facial muscles during the course of imaging can distort the measurements and lead to inaccurate calculations,” the researchers explained.

“Surgeons must therefore still use their judgment and account for the long-term effects of scar tissue and gravity when developing the virtual model.”

Additionally, there can be increased costs if the hospital has not already adopted VSP, 3D printing, and CAD/CAM technologies. But overall, I’d call this a success story.

Postoperative patient photo demonstrating improved facial symmetry 8 months after surgery.

“Although it cannot replace clinical judgment, computer aided technology can produce better, more accurate outcomes and should be considered for soft tissue reconstruction,” the team concluded.

The post 3D Printing and Virtual Surgery Help Repair Damage to Patient’s Face appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Porsche Creating Partially 3D Printed Seats that Offer Different Levels of Comfort

3D printing is used often in the automotive sector, and many recognizable names, from Volkswagen and BMW to Ford and Toyota, are adopting the technology. German automobile manufacturer Porsche, which specializes in high-performance sports cars, SUVs, and sedans, has turned to 3D printing multiple times in the past to make components for e-drive powertrains and turbo inlet ducts. Now, the company has revealed its latest innovation – 3D printed bodyform bucket seats.

Michael Steiner, a member of the executive board for research and development at Porsche, said, “With the ‘3D-printed bodyform full-bucket seat’, we’re once again giving series-production customers the opportunity to experience technology carried over from motor sports.”

The manufacturer, based in Stuttgart, currently considers the seat a concept study, and not yet a production part. The seat’s central section is partially 3D printed, because the technology will allow Porsche to offer customers an exceptional level of customization – people who order the seat in the future will be able to choose between soft, medium, and hard firmness levels. The central section of the seat will then be custom 3D printed to provide whichever level of comfort they choose.

“The seat is the interface between the human and the vehicle, and is thus important for precise, sporty handling. That’s why personalised seat shells customised for the driver have been standard in race cars for a long time now,” Steiner said.

In the future, the manufacturer plans to bring the 3D printed seats to customers as production parts through Porsche Tequipment. But for now, only 40 of these seats, for the driver only, will be made and installed in the 911s and 718s Porsche racing models; in fact, the new 3D printed bucket seat is based on the company’s current sports seat. These 40 seats will be considered as prototypes, and will only be used on European racetracks this summer with a six-point harness.

Once Porsche receives feedback from the customers, the 3D printed seat will then be included as a regular offering in its Porsche Manufaktur catalogue starting in mid-2021 – if the feedback is good, of course. At that point, Porsche will also offer the seat in a variety of different colors as well.

The base support for the bucket seat is made out of expanded polypropylene (EPP), which is then bonded to the 3D printable, breathable custom comfort layer, featuring an aesthetically pleasing lattice structure. The seat’s final layer is made from a material that Porsche calls Racetex, which has a distinguishing perforation pattern that helps with climate control.

Porsche hopes that in the long run, it will be able to use 3D printing to offer its customers even more customization, such as seats that are designed and molded for a person’s specific body contour and shape, similar to how vehicle seats in motorsports are made for the race car driver.

There isn’t yet a price listed for these customizable 3D printed Porsche seats, but you can bet your bottom dollar that they won’t be cheap; customization rarely is, of course.

What do you think? Discuss this story and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts in the comments below.

(Sources: Autoblog and MSN / Images: Porsche)

The post Porsche Creating Partially 3D Printed Seats that Offer Different Levels of Comfort appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Captiva Spine Receives FDA Clearance for 3D Printed Titanium Lumbar Cages

3D printing has been playing a big role in helping people with spinal conditions over the last few years, particularly in terms of implants and other medical devices. But none of these 3D printed spinal solutions can get too far without the necessary clearance from the FDA. Florida-based Captiva Spine, Inc., a privately owned medical device organization that was founded in 2007, recently received 510(k) clearance from the FDA for its 3D printed TirboLOX-L Titanium Lumbar Cages.

“With the advanced capabilities of 3D Additive Manufacturing we were able to create a unique lattice structure similar to trabecular bone incorporating a micro-rough surface for clot retention and early osteogenic cell migration, including a dual layer of porosity with pore sizes specifically designed to promote bone ingrowth and vascularization,” said Dennis Ty, the Director of R&D of Captiva Spine. “Through substantial surgeon design input we are able to deliver TirboLOX-L’s unique dual layer organic lattice structure with numerous geometries and sizes that appeal to a wide range of surgeon preferences.”

The company helps spine surgeons, healthcare facilities, and tenured spine distributors that work to provide patients with progressive, high quality spinal care. It’s dedicated to providing elegant and intuitive spinal fusion solutions, such as its TirboLOX-L Titanium Lumbar Cages. This spinal implant uses 3D printing to form interbody fusion devices, made out of titanium alloy, with a double layer organic lattice structure.

The lattice structure has an open architecture, a micro-rough surface topography, and interconnected dual porosity. The architecture can help lower radiographic presence to ensure clear imaging, while implants that possess the latter two features have shown that they can promote bone ingrowth, ongrowth, and vascularization. In addition, Captiva’s TirboLOX-L has a high coefficient of friction, which, as the company puts it, “creates immediate bidirectional fixation.”

Some of the main benefits of 3D printed porous titanium alloy cages, like the TirboLOX-L lumbar cages made of Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4V), is bone’s ability to successfully grow within its architecture, which can then help it achieve good kinematic properties. The TirboLOX-L Titanium Lumbar Cage also features the company’s Pivotec technology.

“I am pleased our development team was able to incorporate our proprietary Pivotec Pivoting TLIF Cage into TirboLOX,” said Dale Mitchell, the President and Founder of Captiva Spine. “Pivotec technology has been used in thousands of surgeries to address the challenges of controlling cage insertion and angle manipulation during surgery and is now available in a wide range of porous Titanium 3D printed, sterile packaged implants. This is especially important during minimally invasive (MIS) applications where time and safety is always of the essence.”

With FDA clearance, Captiva is now cleared to take its 3D printed TirboLOX-L Titanium Lumbar Cage to market. This device is also one of five new product launches that the company is featuring at the upcoming North American Spine Society (NASS) Annual Meeting later this month in Los Angeles. Stop by its booth #1649 at the meeting to see the other four.

Discuss this story and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below. 

The Real Wolverine: Anatomics Works with Surgeon to Design 3D Printed Titanium Metacarpal Implant

[Image: e-NABLE]

While I did not read the comic books, I was a big fan of the ’90s X-Men cartoon series growing up. In fact, the first short story I ever wrote was about a canine with superpowers named X-Dog…pretty original, right? My love for the mutant superheroes was reawakened when Bryan Singer’s blockbuster movie X-Men came out in 2000, and the world was treated to the first glimpse of Hugh Jackman as Wolverine, the moody mutant with a shadowy, unknown past.

Since then, 3D printing has given other Wolverine fans a way to embody him without having to turn to adamantium. But this has gone one step further now, with a story, as Paul D’Urso, MD, a neurosurgeon at Epworth Healthcare and the Executive Chairman of Australian medical device company Anatomics, tells us, about a “Real Life Wolverine.”

D’Urso said, “Anatomics pioneered the use of 3D printing in surgery in 1995 and has helped surgeons in 40 countries with the most difficult & complex reconstructive surgical problems that no other company could provide a solution for.”

Let’s back up a little first. The five metacarpal bones, which are located between the carpal bones of the wrist and the phalanges of the fingers, make up the intermediate portion of the human hand. Equivalent to the metatarsal bones in the foot, the tops of the metacarpals form our knuckles where they join to the wrist.

We’ve seen 3D printed haptic models representing carpal and metacarpal bones during various hand movements created and studied for potential use in preoperative planning for hand surgery, a 3D printed wrist brace for stabilizing a broken metacarpal while healing, 3D printed patient-specific models and surgical guides for metacarpal deformities, and even a 3D printed titanium bone to replace a metacarpal thumb bone.

Anatomics, a not-for-profit company, has plenty of experience using 3D printing in the medical field, such as 3D printing the first titanium sternum and set of ribs and vertebrae. The company recently had to call on this experience to help with an important case.

“This man had a severe workplace injury and lost the bones in the middle of his left hand,” D’Urso told 3DPrint.com. “As there was no ‘off the shelf ‘ solution his hand surgeon, Dr Dan Rowe, called upon Anatomics to reconstruct the patient’s hand with a 3D printed titanium implant.”

Anatomics stepped up to the plate and got to work. Together with Dr. Rowe, engineers from the medical device company designed a 3D printed, patient-specific metacarpal implant to replace the patient’s two missing metacarpals and missing capitate that had resulted from his injury.

The implant was designed with titanium mesh, which makes soft tissue ingrowth possible once it’s inserted into the patient’s body. Titanium is biocompatible, with a high resistance to corrosion, both of which combine to allow bone to grow. These qualities make it the perfect material for medical implants, once it’s combined with 3D printed lattice structures.

“The implant was designed to articulate with the other bones in the hand and had special channels in it that allowed the tendons to secure it in position,” D’Urso tells us.

“The implant contained a porous lattice to allow for tissue integration.”


During the patient’s hand reconstruction surgery at Greenslopes Private Hospital in Queensland, Dr. Rowe implanted the 3D printed titanium metacarpal. D’Urso tells us that “Dr Rowe is very pleased with initial results!”

Okay, so the patient didn’t actually end up being a real Wolverine, as only a very small portion of his bones were replaced with metal, but he was still part of something pretty amazing. Innovations like this one are what make 3D printing so important in the medical field. While I imagine the patient still didn’t have the easiest recovery – he did lose the bones in the middle of his hand, after all – I’m willing to bet his quality of life will be better with a 3D printed implant made specifically for his hand than it would be with an off-the-shelf implant, or worse, no implant at all.

Discuss this story and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below. 

Cloud-Based Simulation and More Among New Features in Netfabb 2019

Netfabb has been a popular software program even since before it was acquired by Autodesk, and each year it offers more and more features to its users as Autodesk brings out new versions. Recently, Autodesk introduced Netfabb 2019, which has several new features in addition to updates to some of its existing features. The new release focuses on improved productivity and updates the simulation and latticing, two of the software’s most significant features.

Simulation is a critical part of the additive manufacturing process, particularly metal additive manufacturing. It saves time and materials by allowing the user to run through a process before running it for real, and to smooth out any issues that the software predicts. Netfabb subscribers beginning at the Premium tier can now take advantage of cloud-based, multi-scale, metal powder bed process simulation.

“With metal additive manufacturing, the stakes are high. Materials are expensive and lead times are continually compressed,” says Autodesk. “The ability to anticipate your outcomes can often save the day, and the project. From additive consultancies to industrial innovation labs and research facilities, industry leaders turn to Netfabb Simulation.  Now, this same simulation capability is available in the cloud, allowing you the ability to pay for simulation only when you need it.”

Netfabb simulation uses a multi-scale modelling approach. Users can input machine parameters and material properties to develop their PRM files, then simulate large, complex parts “with a fully predictive part-scale simulation which captures the complex thermal and mechanical interaction between parts during the build process,” says Autodesk. The cloud credit cost for a PRM file is fixed, but part-scale simulation depends on the complexity of the parts being submitted.

In addition, the PRM library has been redesigned to give the user visibility into process parameters. PRM files can now be edited directly from the library.

Manual latticing is now available to customers at the Premium tier, and all Netfabb lattice functionality is now available from a single location. Additional updates allow for better productivity, such as:

  • A replay function that allows regeneration of manual or script-based supports after a change in geometry is made, even after the support strategy has been finalized.
  • Supports can be deleted by criteria
  • Shared viewing and cloud storage
  • A new My Machines workspace that streamlines the process by allowing the user to define only the machines they have access to. The user can also categorize machines by functions and assign repair or support scripts accordingly.

Netfabb 2019 also includes a new workspace for the DMG Mori Lasertec 30 and features updated Form2 integration, giving the user direct access to Form2 from Netfabb.

That’s only a few of the new and updated features that Netfabb 2019 offers – for a full list, you can find out more here.

Discuss this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below. 

[Source/Images: Autodesk]