Honeywell Aerospace to Qualify VELO3D’s Metal 3D Printing for End Use Parts

The entire aerospace industry has sensed the manufacturing sea change and is integrating 3D printing into production wherever it provides value. Like others, Honeywell Aerospace has been qualifying numerous additive manufacturing (AM) technologies for the production of aerospace parts. The latest comes from VELO3D, whose Sapphire metal 3D printer will now be qualified as a viable platform for producing aircraft parts.

VELO3D’s Sapphire system is framed as a uniquely capable metal powder bed fusion (PBF) 3D printer. It is capable of 3D printing complex geometries with little to no support structures, thus reducing labor intensive and costly post-processing steps. Moreover, a highly controlled atmosphere, the use of simulation software for build prep, and in-situ quality control ensure the sort of repeatability that the manufacturing industry has been clamoring for.

For this reason, Honeywell Aerospace selected the Sapphire 3D printer for its qualification program. The machine will be installed at the aerospace manufacturer’s facility in Phoenix, where it will be used to test the possibility of 3D printing Inconel parts. Inconel, a Special Metals brand name for a family of nickel-chromium-based superalloys, is widely used in the aerospace sector for its ability to operate in extreme temperatures.

VELO3D will work with Honeywell to develop the proper parameters necessary for the company to perform material qualification and obtain optimal material properties. The partners believe that the qualification process will be completed by the third quarter of this year.

A stator ring and impeller 3D printed using the Sapphire system.

Dr. Söeren Wiener, senior director of technology and advanced operations for Honeywell Aerospace, explained how the printer will be used more specifically: “We are qualifying VELO3D’s Sapphire system with the aim of printing geometries that can’t be fabricated on existing 3D metal printers. Their technology will help Honeywell develop new production-part applications while also meeting our material requirements for qualification. We intend to qualify this equipment through repeatability testing in our production environment, including build and post-processing, to generate an acceptable set of material property data and qualification of flight hardware.”

Honeywell Aerospace is a part of the larger Honeywell conglomerate, which also operates in the buildings, productivity and safety, and weapons sectors, where it builds missiles and nuclear weapons for the U.S. military. It is the Aerospace division that is performing the largest amount of public work using AM.

While engineers within the company are working on redesigning parts for 3D printing, Honeywell is also teaming with numerous partners to qualify machines, materials and software for aerospace part production. SLM Solutions, for instance, has been chosen to help qualify aluminum, while Sigma Labs is supplying its PrintRite3D platform for qualifying the quality control system. Honeywell is also exploring the use of Digital Metal’s binder jetting technology. However, the first company to be selected for printing aerospace components for the manufacturing giant so far is Sintavia.

Though they work alongside one another often, Honeywell Aerospace and GE Aerospace also compete for federal contracts alongside Boeing, who relies on third party suppliers for AM parts, and United Technologies Corp., which became an even larger aerospace manufacturer after its megamerger with Raytheon last year.

For its part, VELO3D has been finding its own footing after only just recently entering the AM market, with Stratasys and Boom Supersonic acquiring Sapphire systems. As promising as its technology is, it will be interesting to see what the competition does to match Sapphire’s capabilities, some of which seem to be achievable if quality control can be highly accounted for.

The post Honeywell Aerospace to Qualify VELO3D’s Metal 3D Printing for End Use Parts appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Support Structures: The Need, Impact, and Elimination Strategies

A Q&A with David Bentley, Protolabs

Digital manufacturing leader Protolabs has invested heavily in additive manufacturing equipment, with a concentration in laser powder-bed fusion (LPBF) technology. The company recently purchased their first Sapphire metal AM machine from Velo3D to explore its advanced SupportFree capabilities.

Since the earliest days of additive manufacturing (AM), support structures have been a nuisance, impedance, or problem. Whether printing with plastics or metals, very few AM technologies have been able to avoid building parts without them. The need for support structures adds unwanted challenges when designing them, printing them, and removing them.

Presently, nearly all metal AM systems based on the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) class of technology have the requirement for support structures to be added to parts. Generally, these AM processes require supports on all downfacing surfaces that are printed at an angle of less than 45 degrees from the horizontal plane, which is established by the build plate.

David Bentley, senior manufacturing engineer for 3D printed metals at Protolabs, responded to a recent Q&A with some insights into when support structures have the most impact, how elimination translates to benefits, and the best use cases.

Q: How does eliminating support structures impact turnaround time and cost reduction for Protolabs?

Bentley: Eliminating support structures certainly reduces lead time and decreases the expense of printing. Over 95% of the parts that I see in my role require support removal. Considering the resources needed to remove those supports and the associated costs, there’s certainly a business case for cost savings and labor savings. But, after discovering the full impact of a support-less metal AM process, the most compelling reason was that there are some big, high-value parts that simply can’t be produced without a support-less process. Our aerospace customers are really excited about Velo3D’s integrated solution, because it’s the complete package: good parts, good parameters, repeatability and comprehensive tracking and reporting of what’s going on through the process. And for Proto Labs, expanding into the aerospace industry is really interesting so having this advanced technology helps us serve that customer base.

An impeller is an example of a part design that has not been producible additively without major modifications to the design to facilitate support structure removal. By eliminating support structures throughout the interior, metal AM now has a strong business case for impellers, and many more part categories. Photo Credit: Velo3D

Q: How does eliminating support structures lead to quality improvement?

Bentley: Anybody who is experienced with metal AM systems has seen firsthand that support elimination improves part quality. Those that have not been exposed to the metal AM workflow may not appreciate that support structures have a significant, and very visible, effect.

When you have supported surfaces, part aesthetics are compromised after you remove the supports. There is the aspect of having to do the work to remove the supports, but there’s also the quality to consider. If you can have more surfaces that are untouched, you are just going to have a better part. And that’s something that I think Proto Labs really values. We want to have the best-looking parts out there.

Angles below 45 degrees require support structures to ensure stability of the part during the printing process. As the angle decreases, the downward-facing surface becomes rougher and eventually will fail if the angle is reduced too far. Photo Credit: Protolabs

For example, one of our customers has a requirement for consistent surface finish all the way up, and their part has some angles a bit below 45 degrees that would usually require support. These surfaces needed to be consistent with those on unsupported side walls. This was only possible with the elimination of support structures.

Q: How does eliminating support structures enable you to print parts you couldn’t before?

Bentley: The best part candidates are ones with inlets, outlets, and manifold-like structures between these points of accessibility. Examples include shrouded impellers, heat exchangers, and manifolds; essentially anything with complex internal passageways. Support removal can be difficult, impractical, and even impossible due to the lack of accessibility. A lot of those parts are still manufactured via traditional methods. Support-reducing technology really opens up the ability to print those types of designs with much less risk.

Eliminating support structures in AM provides geometric enablement, enabling the printing of parts that would typically fail in the LPBF process. Parts with characteristics of high aspect ratio, steep overhangs, and complex internal passageways are all good candidates. Photo Credit: Velo3D

Also, the unique non-contact recoating technology of the Sapphire machine we’ve just purchased allows you to pretty much build a half-a-millimeter stick that is fourteen inches tall. We don’t have to worry about any height to width ratio anymore. That type of geometry would typically fail in the LPBF process.

David Bentley was one of the six experts that Todd Grimm interviewed for his whitepaper titled “The Business Impact of a Support-Less Process for Metal AM.” To learn more about his insights and experiences with a support-less process, please download the whitepaper here.

The post Support Structures: The Need, Impact, and Elimination Strategies appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

80 additive manufacturing experts predict the 3D printing trends to watch in 2020

Predicting the future is impossible. But that doesn’t stop us at 3D Printing Industry from inviting CEOs, CTOs and other AM experts to give us 3D printing predictions for 2020. If you want to stay up to date with the latest 3D printing news, subscribe to our free 3D Printing Industry newsletter. You’ll be among […]

3D Printing Industry News Sliced: VELO3D, Renishaw, EOS, Victrex, Titomic

In this week’s first edition of Sliced, the 3D Printing Industry news digest, we cover the latest business developments, partnerships, and acquisitions across our industry.  Additionally, you’ll find out what the MACH 2020 show has to offer in 3D printing, investment in additive manufacturing in Scotland, and a 24k gold-plated titanium bike. Read on for […]

3D Printing News Briefs: January 11, 2020

We’ve got some business news to share with you in today’s 3D Printing News Briefs. For starters, Knust-Godwin has purchased a Sapphire 3D printer from VELO3D. The AMable project has issued another Open Call for 3D printing projects, and ASTM International launched an Additive Manufacturing Personnel Certificate Program. Finally, ABĒMIS LLC has announced new hyper-structure technologies for 3D printing.

Knust-Godwin Purchases Sapphire 3D Printer for Oil and Gas Industry

Precision-tool and components manufacturer Knust-Godwin has just purchased its first Sapphire metal 3D printer from VELO3D, which it will use to manufacture high-quality, SupportFree parts for the oil and gas industry, as well as aerospace applications, both of which require complex geometries, rapid delivery, and intense thermal management of extreme temperatures. The Sapphire, which comes with Flow advanced pre-print software and Assure quality management software, will be delivered to Knust-Godwin in the first quarter of 2020.

“We see so many parts that have been manufactured with traditional methods that could take advantage of the benefits from AM,” said Michael Corliss, the VP of Technology for Knust-Godwin. “Our new Sapphire system provides the accuracy and low-print-angle capabilities that enable recreation of those parts via AM without having to go through a complicated redesign process. We can finally print parts as-is, offering valuable cost-savings to our customers and improved turnaround time for delivery.”

AMable Project Launching Third Open Project Call

The AMable project, which works to provide funding opportunities at the EU level in order to develop AM projects from concept to complete product, recently launched a fourth Open Project Call (OC4). This call offers SMEs and small- to medium-sized enterprises the chance to submit a proposal in order to receive financial support, at their own companies, for innovative 3D printing ideas.

The submission deadline for OC4, which has an estimated budget of €450, is March 1st, 2020; available experimentation Types are Feasibility Studies and Best Practice Experiments. For more information, including templates, FAQ, and the rules, please visit the OC4 website.

ASTM International Announces Upcoming AM Certificate Program

The ASTM International Additive Manufacturing Center of Excellence (AM CoE) is launching one of the additive manufacturing industry’s first personnel certificate programs, which will cover all the basic concepts of the AM process chain and provide core technical knowledge, including standardized methodologies, that’s related to best practices. The comprehensive course, which will include specific modules such as design and simulation, feedstock, mechanical testing, post-processing, and safety, was developed after ASTM International completed a landscape analysis in order to determine where the gaps were located in current AM education and workforce development.

“With more and more industry sectors adopting additive manufacturing technologies, there is a growing demand for an educated workforce to support the expanding field. This is a groundbreaking first step in meeting that need,” said Dr. Nima Shamsaei, director of the National Center for Additive Manufacturing Excellence (NCAME) at Auburn University in Alabama, where the course will be held. “To fill the AM knowledge gap, we need world-class training from industry leaders who can equip the future workforce with highly valued technical knowledge.”

The course, held March 10-12, will be taught by academia, industry, and regulatory agency experts, and will require attendees to pass an exam in order to earn the “Basic AM Certificate” that is a prerequisite for specialized, role-based AM certificates that the AM CoE holds.

ABĒMIS Introduces Hyper-structure Technologies for 3D Printing

Cleveland, Ohio-based company ABĒMIS LLC has introduced new HGon technologies, which were developed in-house at ABĒMIS Research Labs and included advanced field-adaptive optimizing hyper-structures for the generative design and 3D printing of ultra-lightweight, vibration-controlling, high strength-to-weight ratio components. HGons just look like lattices when you first look at them, but they actually use controlled complex (directed) structures to push the concept of a lattice to multiple dimensions and “local-global isotropy.”

ABĒMIS can convert nearly any STL or CAD component into a shape-accurate, 3D printable HGon manifold structure, which can reduce a part’s weight by 50-80%. The image to the left shows several examples that the company has completed for current clients, such as Sandia National Labs, Marquette University, and ADDiTEC Inc. ABĒMIS is now offering free initial consultations and sample parts (contact techdemo@abemis.com), and is also requesting investor inquiries for a limited time. To learn more, download the company’s whitepaper, or check out the video below:

Discuss these stories and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts in the Facebook comments below.

The post 3D Printing News Briefs: January 11, 2020 appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

It’s not over until the FAT

The Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) is where the rubber meets the road, as the customer determines if they are willing to accept the machine from the supplier. A FAT process should not play it safe – it should stress-test the equipment, ensuring acceptable and consistent surface finish, laser alignment and stability for the LPBF process.

3D-printing industry evangelists like to promote the idea that “complexity is free.” But in reality, metal additive manufacturing (AM) is complicated. Furthermore, we are beginning to see metal 3D printing advance to production volume. Faster machines with multiple lasers, working in parallel on factory floors or in multiple factory locations – this is the future of metal AM, but we still have some barriers to overcome.

It is no longer enough to meet specifications on a single system – now suppliers and manufacturers must create conformal platforms that repeat the same performance day-to-day and system-to-system. This is becoming even more of a challenge now that many manufacturers are building multiple-laser machines to boost throughput. But how do these lasers work together? Are they able to print on the same surface or are they quarantined to separate areas? The end result needs to be as close to perfection as possible.

Aggressive stress testing of a printer prior to shipment is essential to ensure that it meets specifications. A Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) prior to release to a customer site is the first step in an AM system’s commercial journey.

Image 1. Complete FAT Build measures (1) loading, (2) tensile strength and (3) surface roughness/laser overlay. Image courtesy VELO3D

Above is an example of a 3D-printed FAT build of a wide variety of shape geometries manufactured out of INCONEL on a VELO3D Sapphire metal AM machine with dual-lasers. The components almost completely fill the build chamber, which is this case has a diameter of about 12 inches (300 millimeters) and a height of about 16 inches (400 millimeters). Following the build, a series of tests are run to measure the limits of machine performance and to ensure that customers will be able to fully leverage the equipment’s capabilities in even the most extreme applications.

The first feature to notice on the FAT build pictured above is the round portion at the bottom that is intended to be representative of a fairly large, dense part subject to heavy mass loading. To create this piece almost all of the build plate area is lased with the system’s two lasers at full power (2x lasers 1kW). Post-build tests on this part include core quality to ensure good chamber gas flow, accurate overlay between lasers under high thermal loading, and overall system throughput (i.e. is the machine running as fast as it’s supposed to).

The next characteristic of the FAT to be examined is its height. On the perimeter of the build, two types of bars are printed (2). Arrayed all around the build-plate area, these enable the assessment of even-production quality throughout the entire build. Tensile bars (the straight ones) confirm metal quality. Post-build, these are pulled in a tensile tester to determine ultimate strength, yield and elongation. The perimeter also includes net-shape bars (three are stacked on top of each other) that neck in and out. Such geometric variation enables data collection and evaluation in all dimensions (x, y and z) throughout the bar to detect any degradation or deviation and confirm accuracy throughout the build.

The three spherical towers in the center of the FAT, seen in (3) above (and Image 2 below), validate target surface roughness as well. The different surface angles on each sphere require different skin-production processes, which can then be evaluated for stability throughout the entire build. This ensures there are no defects at the challenging shallow-angled points. One of the towers is designated to check dual-laser overlay—both lasers are used to build the same geometry—to verify alignment and stability.  Evaluation of the towers ensure a degradation-free surface finish regardless of whether the part is being built with a single or dual laser.

Image 2. Spherical towers printed in the center of the FAT are used to evaluate laser alignment and performance. Image courtesy VELO3D

FAT gives AM-equipment customers the confidence that their first, second or hundredth system will perform to specification across an entire range of applications.  But it doesn’t stop there. Follow-up continues with a Site Acceptance Test (SAT) to ensure that the same robust results observed during the FAT can be seen once the AM machine is installed and up and running at the customer’s facility.

Such tight control over system performance ensures that customers can run production parts on multiple systems in their factory and across multiple factories in various locations – all with the same, standardized and qualified recipe.

FAT and SAT testing together ensure that AM systems will be able to print a customer’s most challenging applications upon delivery and enable full-scale production of complex 3D-printed parts. This approach to system delivery ensures that users will be able to apply all their advanced design-engineering capabilities to full-scale production and deliver the most innovative, high-quality parts possible.

To learn more about best practices in multi-laser alignment, come hear Dr. Greg Brown deliver more insights at the Additive Manufacturing Strategies Summit 2020 from Feb 11-12, 2020 in Boston.

By Dr. Gregory Brown, VP of Process Engineering, VELO3D

The post It’s not over until the FAT appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

3D Printing News Sliced: Dr. Hans Langer, Cuttlefish, RIZE, Senvol, Henkel, Open Bionics

The 3D Printing Industry news digest offers a summary of the latest partnerships, award presentations, software updates, material releases and applications from across the sector. In this update, we have snippets featuring Dr. Hans Langer, Mimaki, Velo3D, Dassault Systèmes, bionics hands, 3D printed lampshades, automotive repair and more. Dr. Hans Langer achieves esteemed AMUG recognition  3D […]

VELO3D launches Quality Assurance and Control System validated by Stratasys Direct Manufacturing

Californian metal 3D printer manufacturer VELO3D has released the VELO3D Assure Quality Assurance and Control System for its laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) Sapphire 3D printers. On demand 3D printing service Stratasys Direct Manufacturing is the first to implement the system, validating its value in charting the part quality needed for volume production. Benny Buller, founder and CEO of […]

VELO3D Releases Assure for 3D Metal Printing: Stratasys Direct Manufacturing as First Customer

With the release of the VELO3D Assure™ Quality Assurance and Control System for its Sapphire® 3D metal printers, VELO3D also brings on board a heavy hitter in their first customer as Stratasys Direct Manufacturing, a subsidiary of Stratasys, Ltd., will be the first to integrate Assure into their manufacturing processes.

VELO3D’s Assure™ quality control dashboard enables engineers to track the quality and progress of Sapphire® machines in real-time.

Assure offers unprecedented monitoring and substantiation of part quality, offering the following features:

  • Detects process anomalies
  • Flags issues
  • Highlights necessary corrective actions
  • Offers traceability

“Assure is a revolutionary quality-control system, an inherent part of the VELO3D end-to-end manufacturing solution for serial production,” says Benny Buller, founder and CEO of VELO3D. “Assure is part of our vision to provide an integrated solution to produce parts by additive manufacturing with successful outcomes.”

Upon receipt of their own Sapphire 3D printer earlier this year, Stratasys Direct not only began using Assure, but they produced an entire study from their evaluation, which included:

  • Monitoring integrity of builds
  • Validating bulk material density
  • Observing ongoing process metrics
  • Verifying calibration of the system

Assure predicts defectivity as a function of layer number. An increase in the defectivity metric is correlated with increasing defectivity in the bulk core of the part.

Before and during a build, Assure validates that critical parameters stay within control limits ensuring high quality parts. Clicking on individual squares reveals details on the underlying event.

These results were published in ‘Stratasys Direct Manufacturing Performs Field Validation of VELO3D Assure™,’ after the Stratasys Direct team used Assure for 12 weeks, verifying findings produced by VELO3D. They are now using the system in ongoing production efforts.

“AM can print parts and meet requirements for single units but scaling from a single part into serial production has been challenging. OEMs lack confidence in AM process control, and AM users struggle to demonstrate it. Without visibility into each part’s deposition lifetime AM becomes a risk,” states author Andrew Carter, Sr. Manufacturing Engineer at Stratasys Direct Manufacturing.

Assure boosts manufacturing techniques for the user as they can understand tool health better, calculate part quality, and perform field validation. Engineers 3D printed test structures during their study, producing wedges measuring 20mm x 41mm in width and length respectively. The wedges could be stacked into a tower shape, making a structure to match the build z-height. For each test run, they created two towers.

Test structure added to production builds to enable destructive testing. Image from ‘Stratasys Direct Manufacturing Performs Field Validation of VELO3D Assure™.’

Ultimately, 75 test structures were created and then analyzed via X-rays. Bulk porosity measured at 0.02 percent, and the researchers pointed out that there was no ‘single part exhibiting porosity higher than 0.1 percent. There were no deviations in print quality for the test builds.

Bulk defectivity measured on test parts by x-ray imagery. Image from ‘Stratasys Direct Manufacturing Performs Field Validation of VELO3D Assure™

“Stratasys Direct has built a culture of continuous improvement that means we are continually setting new standards for our industry on quality,” said Kent Firestone, CEO of Stratasys Direct Manufacturing. “We integrated Assure into our quality control workflow because it produces highly actionable insights. The user interface features intuitive graphs and charts that enable us to see and interpret the vast amount of data collected during builds. This information helps our engineers verify the quality of the build each step of the way and enables them to make quick decisions in the event of an issue. Assure helps us reduce production variation, improve yields, and circumvent anomalies to ensure consistent additive manufacturing.”

If you are interested in finding out more about Assure, check out the webinar on November 14th at 10 am PST, offered by Stratasys Direct. Click here to register. Also, if you are attending formnext in Frankfurt, Germany, don’t miss the joint press conference at the VELO3D booth (Hall 11, E79) on November 19 at 10 a.m.

VELO3D continues to be a dynamic presence in the 3D printing realm, from fabrication of a supersonic flight demonstrator to their efforts to expand on design and build limitations. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

Assure provides true z-height quantitative powder bed and part metrology. Note the sections of parts with red lobes indicating metal protruding >300um above the powder bed but still below control limits.

[Source / Images: VELO3D]

The post VELO3D Releases Assure for 3D Metal Printing: Stratasys Direct Manufacturing as First Customer appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

2019 NAMIC Global Additive Manufacturing Summit Day Two

Today we arrive for the second day of the NAMIC Global Additive Manufacturing Summit. First, an MOU was signed between TUV SUD and ThyssenKrupp the two German companies picking the show as the place to ink their cooperation in Additive. Mark Beard, Global Director for Process and Application Development at Additive Industries was the first speaker. Mark spoke of why there were so few metals for 3D printing available. He pointed to the MAPP project and other initiatives that were unlocking machine learning and other beneficial technologies for 3D printing. He took us through the path to qualify a material and showed us how model-based process optimization for 3D Printing is developing.

Next Benny Buller the CEO of Velo3D outlined the Velo advantage and approach to making parts. He showed us how the company is focusing on power and aerospace and is able to make direct part replacements. Rather than focus on design for additive manufacturing, Benny maintains that they can directly replace conventionally manufactured parts with 3D printed parts without redesign. If the firm can do this at scale they would have a real advantage over other players.

C. O. Tham of Austrian steel company Voestalpine looked at DED and showed us how hard facing parts could be made with 3D printing. DED is a less talked about technology than Powder Bed Fusion but as C.O let us know the technology has cost and speed advantages that should not be overlooked. With DED you can also repair parts by cladding them again or even repairing broken blades on a propellor. C.O. also took us through the many specialty 3D printing materials that Voestalpine offers.

Michael Agam President South Asia of Stratasys took us through the new Stratasys Digital Anatomy system for functional anatomical models. He spoke of a case that Stratasys did with Mini in China. Stratasys used Polyjet parts to let people mass customize their Mini cars. He said that they had to work through a lot of problems with for example UV degradation to make this happen.

Shrinivas Shetty the Chief Executive Officer PrinterPrezz then talked about how they want to be a “a foundry” for medical devices. The company wants to “be like a an Uber or a Grab for 3D printing medical devices.” By doing FDA approvals for several companies at a time they say that they can do the approval process in “ten months” and reduce the costs from $5 to $10 million to $1 million. Shrinivas was very optimistic about the prospects of 3D printed orthopedic implants specifically because of the surface quality of the implants means that “it can be applied to many implants.”

Benoit Valin General Manager, Asia Pacific at Essentium then took us through the history of plastics and acceptance criteria for parts. He talked about the limitations of 3D printers, amorphous and semi-crystalline plastics. He explained the difference between the two polymer chains in terms of noodles and explained the advantages of each. Benoit wants to open 11 centers to make and qualify materials across Asia over the next few years.

Johan Pauwels Executive Vice President, Materialise then went on to detail a bit of his experience in working in 3D printing from 1990. He talked of the Materialise mission statement to enable a better and healthier world. He talked about scans and Materialise preoperative planning software letting surgeons plan a child’s surgery before the child was born. He mentioned that there is a 99% chance that if you have a hearing aid that this in the ear hearing aid is printed. He put our industry in perspective by saying that we only represent 0.057% of all industry. If we grew to be 5% of manufacturing we’d already be a $640 billion industry. He showcased the Airbus overhead storage part and the Rapid Fit jigs and fixtures for production part testing.

David Tan General Manager, Asia Pacific and Japan for Formlabs told us how the company helped Gilette 3D print mass customized razors and shared their learnings on mass customization. The firm found that you have to look for value in customized parts for the business and end customers. Glen Hinshaw Chief Executive Officer, RESA talked about 3D printed footwear and insoles. He showed us how his company uses in store kiosks to 3D print customized TPU insoles using FDM printers. At a trial at Costco he produced 50,000 insoles for paying customers.  Sylvia Heisel Director, Fashion Futurist + Creative Technologist at HEISEL told us all about sustainable products and sustainable innovations in 3D printing and beyond towards fashion and wearables.

All in all the Namic Summit was a great event with a lot of exciting viewpoints and learnings for everyone committed to 3D printing.

The post 2019 NAMIC Global Additive Manufacturing Summit Day Two appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.