3DTrust Releases Intelligent Powder Management Solution for Quality Control

3DTrust is a five-year-old startup that began in Munich. In the beginning, the team was one of a crop of startups that wanted to secure the digital supply chain. Through encryption and software, companies could assure themselves that they were printing the right parts, according to the firm. Through product development and contact with the market, the startup has since evolved.

Now, 3DTrust has ten staff, offices in Toulouse and Munich, and a new focus on repeatability. The company saw that the real challenges in 3D printing were in “printing any part anywhere and making sure that quality is right every time” according to cofounder Antoine Jeol. Jeol has a venture capital (VC) background at 3M and learned an immense amount from 3DTrust being a part of Airbus’s startup accelerator. This knowledge led 3DTrust to pivot away from security and toward a more manufacturing-focused offering.

The 3DTrust team cofounders: (L-R) Andrei Mituca, Alexandre Guérin and Antoine Jeol.

When the team partially located to Toulouse for the accelerator program, they were confronted with the challenges that Airbus and its suppliers have. Of course, security is important in commercial aviation, but, other factors, such as traceability, are also of extreme concern. Aviation firms always need to know where parts come from, when they are made, by whom, in what orientation, with which batch of material, on which machine, etc. The team also saw just how many production steps 3D printing for manufacturing required.

Another 3DTrust cofounder I spoke to is Alexandre Guérin, who came from Siemens where he worked at that company’s VC arm. Guérin said that, at many manufacturing companies, the 3DTrust team saw challenges in the “scheduling of production, especially since scheduling and tracking was a manual step, often done with post-its or in Excel.”

The team had to first understand what it took to conduct day-to-day manufacturing with 3D printing. By working with manufacturers, they gained a more in-depth understanding that let them develop their software to work on and with the shop floor. They had to get their software to work with the most popular brands of industrial AM equipment to read and collate data from each of them.

“It could be much more efficient if this tracking was done in software and future job planning was done algorithmically…with reduced human error…resulting in more parts being delivered on time,” Guérin said. “[We had to connect] with EOS, Renishaw, SLM Systems, Stratasys, AddUp and 3D Systems machines… to monitor every machine. If a machine stops, the error notification will get tracked in the software, which can analyze historical trends, detect mistakes, monitor gas levels, get real-time temperatures, receive notifications for specific events, get utilization data and performance data as well.”

With 3DTrust, a user can subscribe to a single machine or multiple machines to only receive the data relevant to them.

Making accessible all of that manufacturing data, scheduling, optimizing, and ensuring traceability is really what the company does now. Jeol believes that every AM machine should be connected and that, while there is a lot of data, in order to achieve true Industry 4.0 process control, that data has to be extracted from all of the connected systems and well managed. Once this happens, 3DTrust can perform traceability, productivity optimization, and analyze entire fleets of additive systems producing parts on time, as well as the post-production steps, to decide what should be done.

In response to client needs, they developed two entirely different architectures. In one, all of their software can be deployed locally, through ethernet cables and customer servers. In the other, Hybrid system, all of the file data is stored locally, but information—such as sensor values—is shared in the company’s cloud. The former version would be especially useful for defense and aviation companies, a group that has traditionally been wi-fi adverse. 3DTrust offers these tools in the form of software-as-a-service, with the company charging $650 per month per machine, although university and large installation pricing are also available. The setup consists of one to three days, typically with 3DTrust often conducting an on-site training for staff of two days.

Users can view individual machine data, aggregate data or dive into individual build plates. They can upload STL or CAD files and queue jobs; files can also be downloaded and re-uploaded from Magics and Netfabb so it is possible to continue to use a preferred file-checking solution in tandem with the software. The output is a specific job file for a user’s particular machine. One could store files in the cloud and schedule or assign files or build platforms to machines or series of post-processing steps. Adjustments in print quality, results, machine utilization, status updates, and part traceability all happen in the software. Users can see delivery dates, materials, and add notes to files and jobs. It can be used in a service environment, in manufacturing or as an internal shared service for large firms.

Through drilling down into each process, machine, and job users can get very granular data, but they can also see performance across time series or analyze all of the alerts and events that delayed builds. One can interface with onboard cameras in printers to check errors and look at individual layers as they are being built, as well.

Jeol said that initially, “We focused on a few key customers in medical, automotive and aerospace to make those customers happy. Making [the software] in conjunction with the guys on the shop floor every day helped us bring value to customers.”

Guérin believes that their customers are using data to get parts made right the first time in AM.

Guérin said, “Optimizing planning saves costs, makes the machines and processes more efficient, faster and cheaper, letting customers industrialize their technology for true serial production.”

In addition to its flagship product, the 3DTrust team has just released a powder management solution. I was very excited about this since, for metals, powder management is key to getting good outcomes in prints, especially for manufacturing. Powder management is essential, but very tedious and time-consuming, especially in highly regulated environments. With the company’s new tool, users can track powder, do inventory management, and use a system that makes tracking easier and more robust as a process.

Meant mainly for large manufacturing companies, but also for universities, the software has some convenient tricks such as a QR print-and-read functionality that lets users stick their own labels on everything. I know from acquaintances that the profusion or lack of labels is often an annoyance. Now, handheld or phone-based scanners can read a production line or lab’s own QR barcodes to quickly tell them about a box, jar or pellet. The system lets users see quantities, dates, materials, storage conditions and availability.

Jeol mentioned that It also enables you to run a “genealogy, a family tree, to see, based on a part, where it came from, with which powder, where it was stored, where it was made, and in which boxes.” It can also be used to track samples or batch tests, with users then able to go back to identify parts or powders that failed tests. Users can also rely on scheduling tools to monitor how often a powder is recycled and combine it with job scheduling, so that a planned job is not able to use a powder recycled more than four times, for example. I’m very bullish on 3DTrust’s powder management tool and would recommend looking at it if you work in a production metal printing environment. It seems to be an intuitive, time-saving piece of technology.

The post 3DTrust Releases Intelligent Powder Management Solution for Quality Control appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Interview with Fried Vancraen on 30 Years in 3D Printing

Being such a young industry, we have only a few giants. One of them is Friend Vancrean. The soft-spoken Fried started as a research scientist before starting Materialise over thirty years ago. Quiet, analytical, and wise Fried has guided Materialise through three decades of 3D printing development. Over that time, the Belgian firm has become a large 3D printing service that is also the de facto leader in 3D printing software. To disclose my biases, I should point out that I’ve worked for Fried, and I admire him. No one else in 3D printing has proven to be as gifted at identifying new business opportunities in 3D printing and avoiding perilous markets. With a long track record, Materialise has pioneered the production and software chain in hearing aids, dental guides, surgical guides, CMF implants, prototypes, car parts, aircraft parts, and functional prototypes. Magics is the default file preparation and planning tool for industrial 3D printing, while software such as 3Matic and Mimics let cutting edge researchers practice their craft. As one of the few publicly traded 3D printing companies, Materialise is closely watched. 3DPrint.com caught up with Fried at formnext to discuss the past three decades of 3D printing as well as the next ten years.

An in-hospital 3D printing lab at the University of Utrecht facilitated by Materialise

Fried says that he and the firm are proud of their financial results, and that “in all three segments..software, medical and manufacturing..the firm has shown growth” with “positive EBITA in all three segments.” Materialise must now “maintain growth and yield” while “3D printing value.” The main method that the firm has had in creating and maintaining value is to “invest in technology” and then to “develop technology that delivers enough value so that people will pay you for the service.” This seems rather simple, but the devil is in the details. “Materialise has proven to be able to deliver value for over thirty years.” In regards to BASF’s Sculpteo acquisition, he says that the firm was well informed ahead of time and “had decided to invest in certain materials and applications together with BASF,” “outside of these BASF wanted to do other market development on its own.”

Materialise’s three segments all require different levels of investment and product development. The firm is “active in many vertical markets as well” in such diverse areas as “eyewear, polymer aircraft interiors, and medical software.” In all of these segments, a common thread is to “adhere to the right quality systems for the right application and vertical” production of a highly regulated aircraft part is very different from a similar part as a medical implant or prototype. Each vertical “has completely different tolerances, needs different environments, and entirely different product lines.” “A CMF implant part is very different and has a very different quality system than an orthopedic implant.” Choice across its broad portfolio is, therefore, a defining characteristic for Materialise. “We don’t just say everything; we don’t just do everything.”
Currently, Fried sees the market as “evolving” with manufacturing taking over from prototypes and concept models. New applications such as “motor and power train components” are now existing next to a “concept and prototypes.” In some sense, many of Materialise’s technologies are complementary, but in others, new methods will have to be discovered. Materialise must, therefore, in a “conscious and determined way make choices in manufacturing.”

A patient specific model can be used to plan or understand surgeries

In some sense, this is what the firm has always done. Fried divides up the last thirty years into three distinct segments “in the first ten years it was a question of proving that it works,” then the “second period was about scaling up,” and the third is “manufacturing.” In 3D printing’s first decade, “we had to prove that prototyping was a viable business,” and it became essential to see to it that “CAD systems and print systems were combined.” “Proven software,“had to be able to produce the parts that customers needed. In the second period, a “scale up” was required, “we had to go from prototyping to manufacturing” and had to “organize manufacturing” in a traceable and documented way. The third period “meant that the firm has to upscale manufacturing” and “cost down.” That period was all about “productivity and connectivity,” and “advanced software was needed to optimize processes and results.” Now we enter the fourth period in the history of 3D printing where “next-generation tools” become part and parcel of the “industrial future.” In keeping with this Materialise is introducing New Product Introduction tools stemming from its own NPI focussed efforts in 3D printing.

A cross section of a lightweighted space craft part made by Materialise

Now, tools will help us go from prototyping all the way to a sustainable product.” With “NPI tools, we’re looking for process optimization” that let you develop a “fine-tuned product” that is “production-ready.” In a case with a customer, the firm has found that it can reduce some extremely long product introductions from years down to a month. Fundamentally he believes that “new tools and new inventions are required.” He sees that “many of today’s OEMs in the market are simply cheaper copies of existing technology.” So far, he contends that “if you want to manufacture, people will stay with EOS.” It is rare to see things like “HP’s MJF that brings some parts into a new cost category.” When asked, he says that he “believes in clustered manufacturing” through smaller desktop 3D printers for certain parts, “but only once those printers have improved significantly” in their build quality. “Consistent data is required..from consistent machines to get..consistent parts.” Once “know-how and competency” leads to “consistent printers..that work in quality systems,” we will see genuinely new developments.

The firm is now an orthopedic implant manufacturer.

If we look at the next ten years in 3D printing, Fried hopes that “Materialise will continue to create value while delivering” on the “next generation of tools” that focus on “bringing costs down and analysis.” At the same time, hopes that Materialise can continue to “strive for a better and healthier world” while remaining a “3D printing sector thought leader.” In the beginning, the company had no idea how to ” “in a systematic way have a positive impact.” Now with the United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals, there is a “global compact, in fact. a quality framework, a framework for a better world.” Helping the firm conduct itself according to this framework. “Every year, he hopes that Materialise is better not only as a business but also how to make products for a better world.” One of the ways the company is tackling this is “to create high value recycled products from waste products“, something it will showcase at the Materialise Summit in May.

The post Interview with Fried Vancraen on 30 Years in 3D Printing appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Interview with Alexandre Donnadieu-Deray of 3YOURMIND

Alexandre Donnadieu-Deray

Alexandre Donnadieu-Deray

Alexandre Donnadieu-Deray is the Managing Director of 3YOURMIND. 3YOURMIND provides software to manage Additive Manufacturing workflows. They offer a part identifyer that helps you see what parts could be suitable for 3D printing, a Manufacturing Execution System and order management software for 3D printing. Encroaching on territory long held by Materialise, 3YOURMIND is trying to conquer a marker that itself is being looked at by the likes of Siemens PLM and Autodesk. Eventually, many companies will need what 3YOURMIND is selling to keep track of parts, determine costs, optimize builds and make it easy to integrate 3D printing with such things as ERP and interfaces for users. When 3D printing becomes quotidian for multinationals they’ll all need it.  3YOURMIND’s products are well-liked and they’re rolling them out globally but can the scrappy startup battle and win against the giants? 

Give us some understanding on your career background?

I joined 3YOURMIND 2 years ago. I was a consultant at Capgemini Invent for 5 years. I was focused on consulting for digital products and organizations at the time. This is where I learned about 3YOURMIND. I was able to be a consultant for them as well while at Capgemini.

What got you interested in the industry of 3D Printing?

I was doing a lot of strategy and addressing needs to improve companies on a large scale. I was aware of 3D Printing and I saw the agility of this field. It requires a smart thought process at looking into manufacturing processes. 3D Printing is a very disruptive methodology. It is very exciting to think through this. Software and digital is very important. This is the sandbox for other manufacturing settings.

What got you interested in 3YOURMIND?

Two things initially got me excited about 3YOURMIND. Firstly, I was interested in the product. It is the first of its kind in the market with such a thorough thought process. The credibility of the product was great. The culture of 3YOURMIND is also great. It is a fun and interesting place. We move dynamically and with agility.

How does the origin of the company in terms of global culture affect operations?

I would say transparency towards customers is highly valued. We speak frankly and straightforwardly. Software is an industry that typically focuses only on the technical aspects of their product. We go away from the typical mindset. Creativity is very important and highly valued. We try to coach individuals on how to best prepare a solution for their business.

What is the DNA of 3YOURMIND?

I would say it is related to the name. There is a lot of openness and creativity. Idea meritocracy is vital. Listening is very important as well. Humility is very important as well in how we operate.

How do you all navigate between trade-offs in tech vs. customer experience?

Firstly we have agility in terms of squads per module. This refers to our teams dedicated to various issues per every business we consult for. Secondly, project managers are very important. Balancing daily operations and long term vision is vital. Lastly, how we approach product design is focused on collaborating and building with the customer.

What is the five year vision of 3YOURMIND?

The goal is to be the software of reference for automating the shop of the future. Digitization will be occuring at a rapid level. Planning towards the factory of the future is what we want to specialize in.

The post Interview with Alexandre Donnadieu-Deray of 3YOURMIND appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

Creatz3D Medical Service Bureau To Offer Medical 3D Printed Models

We’ve written about the enterprising Singapore based Creatz3D before. They made a robot arm, we interviewed them on their expansion in the region and we’ve mentioned their work in News Briefs before. We’re interested in them because they are a reseller of ceramics, metals, bioprinting and plastic systems but also offer software and services. There is currently a huge shift underway in the 3D printing market where people are moving towards enterprise solutions and acting more like systems integrators than box movers. Creatz3D is a great example of a firm that is broadening its offering and moving into more high value applications. A great example of this is their service bureau for medical models. We interviewed Nigel Yap, Accounts Manager for the Creatz3D Medical Service Bureau to find out more.

What is Creatz3D Medical?

Creatz3D Medical Service Bureau pride ourselves as a solution provider in working together with our customers to provide the perfect medical solution for their needs. Being a service bureau that is focused entirely on medical applications, our seamless end-to-end solution guarantees a hassle-free experience in the conversion of CT/MRI images into 3D printed medical models.

What kinds of parts do you produce?

We recreate 3D printed medical models based on patients’ scan such as CT and/or MRI imaging.

Biological models are 3D printed medical models that are solely converted from patient scans (CT/MRI). These are used by surgeons in the interpretation of complex surgical conditions and helps in uncovering new surgical procedures (such as minimally invasive alternatives) that helps in the reduction of surgical time, recovery time and overall risk to the patient.

Educational models meanwhile are used for procedural skills training and simulation. As opposed to operating on human, animal cadavers or medical simulators, these models allow a pathological approach to the practice of rare and complex surgical procedure that would traditionally be taught through 2-dimensional illustrations.

What kinds of materials do you use?

Using the multi-material capabilities of our in-house PolyJet 3D Printer, we can work with a range of materials from rigid to clear and rubber-like properties. These materials have been tested with surgical practitioners and their feedback are that the materials react quite similarly as cortical and cancellous bone structures as well as the soft textural feeling of various human organs. The multi-material capabilities also help in separating anatomical features through color differentiation.

What printers?

We have 2 in-house machines that are used for various purposes, namely the Fortus 450mc as well as the Stratasys J750.

If I wanted to make a medical implant what do I have to take into account?

That is something that we do not offer as the materials that we print with are non-biocompatible for prolonged usage.

Who would you like to partner with?

We are always open to medical device companies who are looking at developing their own range of simulators, that can be used in their training or research and development purposes.

How do you take MRI scans and turn them into printable files?

Imagine the individual slices of the CT/ MRI scans as pages in a book. What our software does is that we take these individual pages and assemble them together back into a book, placing successive layers on top of each other in the creation of this book. After we have stacked the images in successive order, we clean the data to remove unwanted anatomies.

For instance, for the creation of a 3D printed heart model, with a CT scan of the chest cavity, we will remove the lungs and liver and just focus on the heart.

Thereafter, the file is cleaned up in a post-processing software that helps in ensuring that the file is printable and subsequently exported as an STL file that is then read by the 3D printer.

Do you do medical models today? What would they cost?

We currently provide the service of converting CT/MRI images into 3D medical models. The costing of each part varies depending on the anatomy in question. As such, it is difficult for us to provide any figure off hand. It would be best to have a consultation with the customer/ doctor in understanding their requirements before we are able to provide them with an ideal solution.

How can 3D prints help in surgical planning?

There are a number of ways that 3D Printing can help in surgical planning, these includes:

  • Better pre-operative planning through enhanced visuospatial appreciation of the defect in a relationship with other anatomical structures

  • Better pre-operative planning reduces overall surgical time, thus reducing time under general anesthesia, and improving the recovery rate

  • Pre-planned cuts and angles can be done in a customized surgical guide that will reduce surgical time

  • New minimally invasive procedures can be practiced prior to surgery to enable faster surgical time

  • Sizing of implants can be done on the 3D printed medical model instead of traditional methodology such as X-Ray templating on knee implant that has been proven to be inaccurate

How can they help educate doctors?

Medical education has traditionally been going through the concept of “see once, do once, teach once”. This form of education has proven to be effective but it is labour and time intensive. In addition, rare and complex conditions do not normally go through the above concept because of its rarity. This makes it a challenge to enable the right opportunity to be taught to junior doctors.

Many of these rare and complex conditions are thus traditionally taught through 2-dimensional representations. These are however unable to provide a 3D spatial appreciation of the anatomy and do not allow for simulated surgery.

Cadaveric training is also increasingly difficult to organize due to specimen shortages. Even if there is a steady supply, the specimens do not reflect the pathological features that would be required in the teaching of rare and complex conditions.

With 3D printed medical models, medical educators can show rare and complex conditions in a tangible form. They are also able to create customized simulation models where junior doctors can practice upon them in a controlled and risk-free environment. The repeatability nature of 3D printed medical models allows for multiple practice session, akin to being exposed to a real-life simulator for high-risk scenarios, before being allowed to operate.

What kinds of customers do you have?

There are mainly 3 types of customers that we work with for varying applications:

  1. Surgical Practitioners (Doctors)

    1. Pre-surgical planning models
    2. Pre-surgical simulation models
  2. Medical Educators

    1. Medical education models
    2. Procedural skills training simulation models
  3. Medical Device Companies

    1. Training models

    2. Research and development models

Materialise €45 million Q2 revenue driven by strong medical performance

Belgian software and 3D printing service provider Materialise NV (NASDAQ:MTLS) has reported its financial results for the second quarter of 2018. Headline revenue is reported at €45.07 million, a 34.1% increase on the same period in 2017 which was €33.6 million. The company credits strong performance in its medical segment for part of the rise. According to […]