The Effect of Powder Size Distribution on Binder Jetting Steel

In a paper entitled “Effect of powder size distribution on densification and microstructural evolution of binder-jet 3D-printed alloy 625,” a team of researchers test gas-atomized alloy 625 powders of three different powder size distributions including 16–63 μm (full), 16–25 μm (fine) and 53–63 μm (coarse). The powders were 3D printed with green relative bulk densities of about 52%, 45% and 48%, respectively, followed by vacuum-sintering at temperatures between 1225°C and 1300°C for 4 hours.

“For the fine and coarse powders with narrow size distribution, printing defects with high pore coordination numbers may form during the binder jetting process which cannot be removed during the final sintering stage even during supersolidus liquid phase sintering,” the researchers state. “However, the full particle size distribution gave higher green density with fewer large, highly coordinated pores so supersolidus liquid phase sintering was able to reach near-full density. Additionally, the fine powders gave non-uniform, anisotropic linear shrinkage during sintering which is unfavorable for designing complex structures.”

The researchers, using binder jetting, 3D printed samples of each powder size distribution, and sintered three samples from each set to study densification behavior. The bulk density and mass of each sample was measured when both wet and dry. For all particle size ranges, the relative bulk density increased with increasing sintering temperature from 1225°C to 1285°C. For temperatures above 1270ºC, it was also found that the coarse powder range samples had the lowest sintered density while the fine powder range samples showed the highest density.

“In general, it is thought that wide pore size distributions and low green density associated packing defects affect microstructural evolution, in particular the grain size and diffusion distances in final stage sintering and this controls final density,” the researchers state. “Thus, it was essential to examine the effect of the PSD on the average microstructural descriptors associated with the densification process. These include the average grain and pore size.”

In the experiments, binder jet 3D printing parameters including layer thickness, binder saturation and drying time were kept constant in order to study the effect of powder size and particle size distribution on the densification behavior. The following conclusions were reached:

“During densification of parts sintered between 1225 °C and 1300 °C for 4 h, the 16–25 μm powder showed higher linear shrinkage compared to the 16–63 μm and 53–63 μm powders. This correlated with lower green density of 45% achieved from the fine powder compared to the 47% and 52% for coarse and full range powders, respectively. Additionally, it was seen that as the sintering temperature increased to 1285 °C or higher, linear shrinkage in z direction was greater than that in the x and y directions, especially in 16–25 μm powder. This is thought to be due to the effect of gravity on particle rearrangement during sintering.”

In addition, densification was faster in the 16–25 μm powder samples up to 1270°C, but at the higher sintering temperature, the 16–63 μm powder samples showed faster densification behavior and more pore elimination during the final stage supersolidus liquid phase sintering.

Authors of the paper include Amir Mostafaei, Pierangeli Rodriguez De Vecchis, Ian Nettleship and Markus Chmielus.

Discuss this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com or share your thoughts below. 

 

 

 

166 Replies to “The Effect of Powder Size Distribution on Binder Jetting Steel”

  1. Pingback: viagra online usa
  2. Pingback: cialis from canada
  3. Pingback: buy cialis generic
  4. Pingback: cvs pharmacy
  5. Pingback: canada pharmacy
  6. Pingback: Buy cialis online
  7. Pingback: Buy cialis online
  8. Pingback: vardenafil 10mg
  9. Pingback: vardenafil generic
  10. Pingback: levitra 20mg
  11. Pingback: 메이저카지노
  12. Pingback: payday advance
  13. Pingback: viagra for sale
  14. Pingback: cialis generic
  15. Pingback: estela
  16. Pingback: discount viagra
  17. Pingback: online casinos
  18. Pingback: dang ky 188bet
  19. Pingback: cialis generic
  20. Pingback: cheapest viagra
  21. Pingback: cialis 5 mg
  22. Pingback: viagra cost
  23. Pingback: viagra pill
  24. Pingback: Eddie Frenay
  25. Pingback: w88
  26. Pingback: cheap viagra
  27. Pingback: generic viagra
  28. Pingback: viagra cheap
  29. Pingback: viagra online
  30. Pingback: sildenafil
  31. Pingback: viagra for sale
  32. Pingback: viagra for sale
  33. Pingback: tadalafil tablets
  34. Pingback: cheap cialis
  35. Pingback: celebrex tablets
  36. Pingback: cipro cheap
  37. Pingback: viagra dosage
  38. Pingback: hollywood casino
  39. Pingback: cialis
  40. Pingback: best pill for ed
  41. Pingback: canada ed drugs
  42. Pingback: cialis online
  43. Pingback: cbd pills for sale
  44. Pingback: cbd cannabis oil
  45. Pingback: buy essays cheap
  46. Pingback: write my essays
  47. Pingback: write essays
  48. Pingback: buy essay cheap
  49. Pingback: buy diamox
  50. Pingback: cheap differin
  51. Pingback: dramamine prices
  52. Pingback: cialis generic buy
  53. Pingback: meclizine tablet
  54. Pingback: cost of mestinon
  55. Pingback: prevacid 15 mg nz
  56. Pingback: reglan online
  57. Pingback: rogaine generic
  58. Pingback: seroquel tablet
  59. Pingback: vantin 200 mg usa
  60. Pingback: verapamil tablet
  61. Pingback: zyvox online
  62. Pingback: cephalexin uk
  63. Pingback: cialis 20 mg cost
  64. Pingback: cost of etodolac
  65. Pingback: rqbpnnor
  66. Pingback: viagra cost
  67. Pingback: buy cialis rush
  68. Pingback: treatment for ed
  69. Pingback: med pharmacy
  70. Pingback: cialis 20 mg cost
  71. Pingback: zestril tab 10mg

Comments are closed.