Refining Macro and Microscopic Topology Optimization for AM Processes

Researchers from Italy and Germany continue along the path so many are following in refining and perfecting 3D printing processes. In the recently published ‘Structural multiscale topology optimization with stress constraint for additive manufacturing,’ authors Ferdinando Auricchio, Elena Bonetti, Massimo Carraturo, Dietmar Hömberg, Alessandro Realik, and Elisabetta Rocca are experimenting with ways to improve topology with new algorithms, parameters, and workflows in FDM 3D printing and additive manufacturing for industrial production.

Better functionality in parts is the goal as the authors examined methods for optimizing geometries, analyzing stress constraints, and exploring further ways to create functionally graded material structures (FGMs), along with the potential for using homogenization methods. In using FGMs, they expect to also be able to create structures that are multi-material graded also, and in allowing for a constraint on the stress σ they can improve AM processes—especially for ‘lightweight structures with small material volume.’

“As it is known, one of the main characteristics of AM technology is the possibility to construct objects with prescribed macroscopic and microscopic structure,” stated the researchers. “We aim to introduce a model to get a combined optimization of the two scales of this structure: a macroscopic scale corresponding either to the presence of material or to the presence of no material (i.e. voids), and a microscopic scale corresponding to the microscopic density of the material.”

The authors created a model of double phase-fields, with two sets of ‘positive measure’ meant to offer optimization of both the macroscopic and microscopic scales of the structure. The new model defines both material presence, and density.

Cantilever beam: Reference structure obtained using a single material.

Cantilever beam: Sensitivity study of the graded-material structure with respect to the parameter κ2 . χ value distribution.

Cantilever beam: Sensitivity study of the graded-material structure with respect to the parameter κ2 . Von Mises stress value distribution.

As a sample for their project, the authors manufactured an optimized cantilever beam on an FDM 3D printer at the University of Pavia ProtoLab. They were able to use two different polymer filaments, employing an ‘extremely intuitive approach,’ with an χ distribution threshold, separating structures into two regions for multi-material production. And while they found that this technique did not allow them to vary material density as hoped, they are working on more complex methods for the future.

FDM machine at ProtoLab and 3D printed cantilever beam

Description of possible workflow to obtain from a continuous χ distribution a 3D printed object: In the first step the continuous χ distribution (a) is split in two parts and the corresponding .STL files are generate (b), in a second step the 2D geometries are extruded to obtain a printable file (c) which can be directly sent to the FDM machine to obtain the printed structure (d).

The team was successful in creating the FGM structures they were striving for, through intense analysis and the creation of a numerical algorithm, along with the introduction of a ‘simple but effective’ workflow allowing for 3D printing of samples in their research.

“As further outlooks for the present contribution we plan to investigate the influence of the microstructure on the material model and to extend the numerical algorithm to 3D problems,” concluded the researchers.

Optimization of topology is ongoing within 3D printing, from streamlining workflow in creating orthotics to considering fields and implicit geometry, to improving components for the automotive industry, and more. What do you think of this news? Let us know your thoughts! Join the discussion of this and other 3D printing topics at 3DPrintBoard.com.

[Source / Images: ‘Structural multiscale topology optimization with stress constraint for additive manufacturing’]

The post Refining Macro and Microscopic Topology Optimization for AM Processes appeared first on 3DPrint.com | The Voice of 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing.

145 Replies to “Refining Macro and Microscopic Topology Optimization for AM Processes”

  1. Pingback: cialis walmart
  2. Pingback: Free viagra
  3. Pingback: Canadain viagra
  4. Pingback: viagra cialis
  5. Pingback: Get cialis
  6. Pingback: online vardenafil
  7. Pingback: vardenafil 10mg
  8. Pingback: vardenafil online
  9. Pingback: real online casino
  10. Pingback: 35 replica rolex
  11. Pingback: payday loans
  12. Pingback: cialis 20
  13. Pingback: cialis 20
  14. Pingback: samantha
  15. Pingback: 20 cialis
  16. Pingback: diet pills
  17. Pingback: cialis 5 mg
  18. Pingback: new cialis
  19. Pingback: slot machine games
  20. Pingback: free slots
  21. Pingback: casino slots
  22. Pingback: online slots
  23. Pingback: what is viagra
  24. Pingback: generic sildenafil
  25. Pingback: viagra online usa
  26. Pingback: fun88.viet
  27. Pingback: when to buy viagra
  28. Pingback: viagra pill
  29. Pingback: online viagra
  30. Pingback: tadalafil cialis
  31. Pingback: buy viagra 50 mg
  32. Pingback: free slots online
  33. Pingback: www.jueriy.com
  34. Pingback: viagra pills
  35. Pingback: cialis coupon
  36. Pingback: cipla cialis
  37. Pingback: ceclor pharmacy
  38. Pingback: celexa cheap
  39. Pingback: cephalexin cost
  40. Pingback: claritin 10 mg uk
  41. Pingback: slot machines
  42. Pingback: play casino
  43. Pingback: au cialis
  44. Pingback: Get viagra fast
  45. Pingback: buy levitra online
  46. Pingback: buy viagra uk
  47. Pingback: order real viagra
  48. Pingback: diamox online
  49. Pingback: mail order cialis
  50. Pingback: lamisil for sale
  51. Pingback: lopressor prices
  52. Pingback: luvox 100mg cheap
  53. Pingback: mobic online
  54. Pingback: clozapine for sale
  55. Pingback: overdose on viagra
  56. Pingback: xjhuorok
  57. Pingback: buy viagra
  58. Pingback: lamotrigine online
  59. Pingback: lasix tablet cost

Comments are closed.